Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

keithos27

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 17, 2006
131
0
Can someone please explain to me what the differences between these two graphics cards are? My main use will be with a 6-core Mac Pro and a 27" Apple Cinema Display. I'd like to watch Netflix/Huly Plus full screen. I will not be doing any video editing. I will be doing some audio editing and the basic Apple iLife applications.

What are the pros/cons of the 5770 vs the 5870? I know the 5870 uses more power and I've also heard it's louder.

My Mac Pro will be in my bedroom so noise is a factor.

Thank you,
Keith
 

goMac

Contributor
Apr 15, 2004
7,662
1,694
You don't need the 5870.

Hell, Flash video doesn't even use the GPU, so really your GPU choice doesn't matter at all.
 

sboerup

macrumors 6502
Mar 8, 2009
416
2
I would only commend the 5870 if you plan on gaming. If not the 5770 is still awesome.
 

keithos27

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 17, 2006
131
0
okay, thank you for chiming in. figured i'd ask since the $200 difference is relatively small compared to the overall system cost.

i figured the 5870 would not apply to a user like myself, but thought maybe there is some advantage i was missing/not thinking of.

-keith
 

keithos27

macrumors regular
Original poster
Apr 17, 2006
131
0
i have an xbox 360, ps3, and wii... i think i have enough gaming options. :D
 

jeanlain

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2009
2,430
933
Beside price considerations, the noise and power consumption too argue in favor of the 5770.
 

englishman

macrumors 6502a
Nov 6, 2006
730
10
I've heard that the 5770 is comparable to the old 4870. So its a good card. Apple did take on board the criticisms with previous launches
 

goMac

Contributor
Apr 15, 2004
7,662
1,694
Does Aperture make use of the extra power of the 5870?

Yes, it would. I don't know if the gains would be as much as something like a game or a 3D app, as Aperture is mostly a VRAM hog and the 5770 and 5870 both have 1 gig of VRAM, but it would help.
 

macz1

macrumors 6502
Oct 28, 2007
315
5
The 5770 can be seen as a low-power, silent version of the 4870, offering comparable performance. And in addition to that, it has twice the videoram as the the official 4870...

Not a bad choice for a stock card IMO.
 

bearcatrp

macrumors 68000
Sep 24, 2008
1,733
69
Boon Docks USA
I ordered the 5770. Not a gamer so figured this will be fast enough. Ships 29 September. Since both have 1gb, shouldn't be real far apart on performance. Just hope apple doesn't cripple it in an OS update to try and force us 2008 owners to buy a new pro for the graphics card. Don't plan on getting a new Mac pro until sanyasi bridge comes out. By then I should be able to afford one. :eek:
 

crapgarden

macrumors newbie
Oct 31, 2010
1
0
Loud?

So the 5870 is louder? If so a lot louder? Are we talking vacuum cleaner loud, or running kittens loud?
 

jav6454

macrumors Core
Nov 14, 2007
22,303
6,257
1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
Can someone please explain to me what the differences between these two graphics cards are? My main use will be with a 6-core Mac Pro and a 27" Apple Cinema Display. I'd like to watch Netflix/Huly Plus full screen. I will not be doing any video editing. I will be doing some audio editing and the basic Apple iLife applications.

What are the pros/cons of the 5770 vs the 5870? I know the 5870 uses more power and I've also heard it's louder.

My Mac Pro will be in my bedroom so noise is a factor.

Thank you,
Keith

One has 800 cores the other 1600 cores.... the rest is well, very well documented.
 

Sazarret

macrumors newbie
Feb 3, 2011
1
0
Two ATI Radeon HD 5770 1GB - Vs - One ATI Radeon HD 5870 1GB

Hi guys.
I'd like to amplify the question.
Currently Apple is offering custom set ups for the Mac Pro. The first one with two 5770 cards and the other with one 5870 card. Are the two -slightly inferior- cards togetter better in performance and speed than the one faster card, or the two cards set up it's just for multi-displaying purposes only and will not affect the overall graphic performance?

I work in video post-production and 3D for broadcast, so I'll like to know which set up I should choose for the new Mac Pro I intend to get.
 

Mackilroy

macrumors 68040
Jun 29, 2006
3,921
585
In the case of OS X, they're simply for multiple displays – the only advantage would be that the entire framebuffer of each card would go to whatever monitor it was driving instead of having each monitor consume a portion of one GPU's memory.
 

whiskey

macrumors member
Aug 23, 2006
41
0
Hey guys,

Are there any advantages to the 5870 for photoshop work? I currently have the 5770 as well, but sometimes find it a bit slow when I'm moving layers around.

Just curious. I would likely sell my 5770 to fund the 5870.

Thanks
 

kunia

macrumors regular
Oct 30, 2010
166
12
so you're spending thousands on a new mac pro, yet trying to save 200$ and going with crappier card (sorry but it's a ****** card)...I sort of fail to understand that.

5870 is much more powerful. And no, it's as "loud" as the 5770 (I have both). And although you're not doing any video edition or use aperture or even play games or do any 3d cad work under windows, what if in 2 months you find some crazy new hobby that might require that extra gpu power?

Meh...no matter how cheap of a brand new mac pro you get, this is NOT a budget buy...$1k for 5-10% boost in processor juice I understand, but 200$ on a 2x more powerful video card that won't feel obsolete in 1 year, I don't.
 

dimme

macrumors 68040
Feb 14, 2007
3,026
27,612
SF, CA
Hey guys,

Are there any advantages to the 5870 for photoshop work? I currently have the 5770 as well, but sometimes find it a bit slow when I'm moving layers around.

Just curious. I would likely sell my 5770 to fund the 5870.

Thanks

I am under the impression for photoshop work you will not see a advantage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.