Thanks everyone for your help. I greatly appreciate it as you didn't have to go to the trouble, and you've given me a lot of info.
I wish I knew about Scancafe, I just spent $79 on Vuescan and hours and hours on reading up on workflows, TWAIN plugins, etc. I don't mind doing the work either as I enjoy learning, just hate the time it takes
.
Here is how I am doing it:
1. Scan using "Vuescan":
300dpi
Scan to file
Auto Skew
Filters based on prints (restore colors, Gradient reduction "Light", All Frames)
ICC Profile - scanner.icc, sRGB
Tiff format w/ Auto compression, fixed 300dpi
2. Open in "Aperture":
Import into Project
Apply the necessary preset to the scanned batch (I have saved presets depending on
b/w, faded, new, etc. photographs)
Repeat process, over, and over, and over lol
I am working on a workflow application to scan the images, change image name, save to file, open Aperture, import into project. This may cut down on time.
Like you stated though, it is time consuming, but if I do a little each day while I work (grad student and work from home/small business) hopefully I'll be done by, New Years?
Thanks again everyone!
Just a couple of thoughts, and of course they may not apply in your case... or YMMV.
At 300 DPI you are limiting yourself to making prints that are the same size as your originals, or perhaps a bit bigger. This may not be a "limitation" for you needs, but I just point it out.
Some/most of the filters that VueScan can be duplicated in Aperture. VueScan has the ability to scan to a RAW/DNG file. I believe Aperture should be able to read this file. If not save to TIFF.
There is nothing special about the "processing" that VueScan does vs "processing" it in Aperture or Lightroom. It's just where you want to work. As long as the file from the scan has all the information in it, any good SW package (Aperture/VueScan/Lightroom) can "fix" it.
I think you are working too hard, and I believe you think that each scan needs to be worth the "sweat equity". There is no way to make batch scanning "easy", but it can be made "easier".
Set VueScan to take a really good scan of the print to RAW/DNG or TIFF (don't fuss about the colour) the set auto-repeat and stand there for an hour or two listening to your favourite tunes while you swap prints in and out every 3 to 5 seconds. Make the tunes
loud - helps.
Then find all the images that have similar colour issues. Fix one, and save as a preset (I'm using Lightroom terminology, but afaik Aperture works similarily). The apply that preset to those images. If Aperture works like LR, you simply apply the preset to the group and it takes as long to do one as ten images.
(Note: Aperture may already ship with presets to fix faded colour, etc, or they may be available as free plugins)
Flag those images as done.
Find the next batch that share a characteristic, rinse, repeat, (don't forget to add keywords as you go)
Personally, I really like VueScan - it does an amazing job, but I'd rather work with a different interface (Lightroom in my case, probably Aperture for you).
I don't mind taking the time to scan and fix one image, if I know that I can then use that to automate a bunch more scans. In my project, it took me an hour or two to get the first photo/scan "right". It then took me 3 or 4 hours to do the next 246 images. Including rotating the entire folder of scans 90º CW. My photos were all the same size, so not exactly the same - but it gives you a sense.
Update: Just re-read your post. I see that I missed the bit that you are already partly automated. So, ignore those bits in my post. However, use auto repeat to further automate. Also, VueScan can rename for you. Read the help. Pay attention to the bits about using @. Also, I would use ProPhoto RGB or Adobe RGB. sRGB is a lowest common denominator colour space that is designed to be consistent across standard, average, monitors. Modern inkjets have a bigger colour space, plus in a few years average monitors will be able to display more colours, and the sRGB colour space may be very limiting.
Lots of info to digest....
Cheers