Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Amazon Set to Step Up as Next iPad Competitor

ksgant

ksgant

macrumors 6502a
Jan 12, 2006
797
710
Chicago
hexagonheat said:
Actually... yeah. It is one of Amazon's best selling, if not THE best selling product.

The Kindle App isn't great for reading on LED screens. Once you experience e-ink and read for 2+ hours or in sunlight then you'll understand. Plus battery life that is measured in weeks and not hours is pretty darn great as well as free wireless integration.
Click to expand...

Well, you're wrong. You're making assumptions on everyone being like you. I myself own a Kindle 3 and a massive library of Kindle books, and since getting the iPad I've not once picked up the Kindle. I read all day and all night on the thing (I read a ton of books as it's my main "hobby") and I never get eye strain. Never. Not once. I can read in bed at night with all the lights off (including that little Kindle LED light attached to my Kindle's case) with my iPad and the text reversed out in the Kindle app. The eye strain argument is just a myth. I've watched TV in a dark room for 40 years and never got eyestrain. I'm typing this right now in a dark room on a LED monitor on my Mac and don't have any eyestrain.

Not to mention using the dictionary on the Kindle app on the iPad is infinitely easier do to just touching on a word and BAM the definition comes up...unlike having to cursor down down down....over over over...to the word then look it up in the dictionary as you would on the hardware Kindle.

NOW, having said this. Amazon is probably the company that can actually have a challenger against the iPad with a new Kindle touch screen and the entire Amazon infrastructure to back it up. What I'd like to see is have a dual-layer type Kindle. One with a nice color screen running a hybrid Android OS that Amazon controls and updates and on TOP of that an e-ink screen that transparent most of the time unless you're reading a book. And all of it touch-screen. Not sure the technology is available for something like that yet, but I'd be interested in something similar.
 
J

JohnDoe98

macrumors 68020
May 1, 2009
2,488
99
Arcus said:
Canada cant innovate?
Click to expand...

Nope, the tv/internet/cable/mobile providers, which are all the same, run government here. So regulations don't allow a free competitive market to exist, which means we get the shaft on just about everything technologically related.
 
B

benpatient

macrumors 68000
Nov 4, 2003
1,870
0
ctdonath said:
Barnes & Nobles is way ahead of them with the Nook Color.
Interesting the article doesn't mention B&N.
Click to expand...

if B&N is selling 1 Nook (of any variety) for every 10 Kindles sold, I'd be shocked.

I saw my first nook "in the wild" a couple weeks ago. I know of 5 people in my office have a Kindle. There are maybe 35 people there.
 
O

Obi-Wan Kubrick

macrumors regular
Jun 18, 2007
205
0
If anyone could do it my guess would be Amazon. The Kindle is such a wonderful device albeit one that's usefulness and lifespan probably won't last much longer at least as e-ink only. Amazon makes the best E-Ink reader so I'm sure they could make a great full on tablet.

I would like to see the rumored device that switches between LCD and E-Ink.
 
E

ericinboston

macrumors 68020
Jan 13, 2008
2,005
476
I think Apple will be in the fight of its life in the Tablet industry. Tablets are going to be the next iPod (not iPad)...everyone will want/have one as the prices drop and the features expand. Major players in the world are not going to let Apple own the Tablet market like they do with iPod.

We have an iPad 1.0 and it's a nice web surfing & email device sitting in our kitchen. But even the web surfing, in general, is fair/poor...due to lack of Flash (come on, everyone uses it) as well as some of the pull-down menus and choice boxes that websites use when making a purchase. Apple really needs a much better browser on the iPad. We won the iPad so it's free for us...but we never would spend $500+ for it...even iPad 2.0. 3.0 needs a lot more features, a better price for storage ratio, and some other things I and others have listed a few times on these forums for us to go out and buy one.
 
H

HarryKeogh

macrumors 6502a
Jun 25, 2008
609
863
MrSmith said:
I'm still wondering the same about the iPad. I know people spent their hard earned cash on it, but what the hell anyone uses it for I have no idea.
Click to expand...

The same things that 90% of the population use their computers for 90% of the time. Web-surfing and checking e-mail. But with killer battery-life and incredible portability.

You really have to ask this question a year and a half after its release? C'mon.
 
ksgant

ksgant

macrumors 6502a
Jan 12, 2006
797
710
Chicago
MrSmith said:
I'm still wondering the same about the iPad. I know people spent their hard earned cash on it, but what the hell anyone uses it for I have no idea.
Click to expand...

Seriously? You have no idea what people use an iPad for. Even after tons of people tell you what they use it for, do you still not have any idea?

Problems with cognitive comprehension perhaps? Maybe see a specialist that can treat this problem of not understanding what people say or explain to you? Just a thought.
 
L

lewchenko

macrumors 6502
Jun 8, 2004
356
441
Once I got a Kindle, I gave up reading books on the iPad.

The Kindle has a much better screen for reading books on in daylight, is much lighter, has free 3G access, and its battery lasts for weeks.

Different Markets, but I see a lot of people with Kindle's these days reading books. Magazines... not so much due to the ridiculous over pricing (Economist Im looking at you here especially!)
 
Bernard SG

Bernard SG

macrumors 65816
Jul 3, 2010
1,354
7
hcho3 said:
4 Million?

Unless they are pricing this thing around 200 dollars to compete with ipad 2, I don't see this happening. What OS will it run on... anyway?
Click to expand...

I seem to remember reading it will be Android. Not sure which version, though.
 
Lesser Evets

Lesser Evets

macrumors 68040
Jan 7, 2006
3,527
1,294
It's a logical step, but I doubt that Amazon's ability to craft a seductive table will be easy. Apple creates seductive devices that are well-designed and easy to use, making them infinitely more attractive to buyers.

I still like my books on paper. Kindle or iPad, I don't find 7,000+ words very enjoyable on either.

Give me iPad 5 when it all comes together in a powerful package with all the frills.
 
B

BackInAction

macrumors newbie
Jun 13, 2011
9
0
Like gaming consoles, Amazon can take a loss (or make little) on the hardware because they know they'll make money through other revenue streams. Apps, media (books, music, movies) and accessories.

Assuming the hardware is solid. This will be Apple's first true tablet competitor. The other tablet vendors are hardware manufactures. They have it tough because they only have one source of revenue, selling the hardware. They lack the whole ecosystem that Amazon as already built up.

Will it sell more than iPad, no. But I bet will be the best selling Android tablet.
 
drew0020

drew0020

macrumors 68020
Nov 10, 2006
2,334
1,235
ksgant said:
Well, you're wrong. You're making assumptions on everyone being like you. I myself own a Kindle 3 and a massive library of Kindle books, and since getting the iPad I've not once picked up the Kindle. I read all day and all night on the thing (I read a ton of books as it's my main "hobby") and I never get eye strain. Never. Not once. I can read in bed at night with all the lights off (including that little Kindle LED light attached to my Kindle's case) with my iPad and the text reversed out in the Kindle app. The eye strain argument is just a myth. I've watched TV in a dark room for 40 years and never got eyestrain. I'm typing this right now in a dark room on a LED monitor on my Mac and don't have any eyestrain.

Not to mention using the dictionary on the Kindle app on the iPad is infinitely easier do to just touching on a word and BAM the definition comes up...unlike having to cursor down down down....over over over...to the word then look it up in the dictionary as you would on the hardware Kindle.

NOW, having said this. Amazon is probably the company that can actually have a challenger against the iPad with a new Kindle touch screen and the entire Amazon infrastructure to back it up. What I'd like to see is have a dual-layer type Kindle. One with a nice color screen running a hybrid Android OS that Amazon controls and updates and on TOP of that an e-ink screen that transparent most of the time unless you're reading a book. And all of it touch-screen. Not sure the technology is available for something like that yet, but I'd be interested in something similar.
Click to expand...

I completely disagree with you, but again that why so many different products are sold. E-ink is amazing. I cannot nor do I want to read books on a LCD screen. The pixels are so visible, the tablet is too heavy for reading, you cannot see the screen outdoors, and it just doesnt feel right. I love my Kindle and I think Amazon will be very successful with their tablet.

I hope Amazon is very successful with this!
 
E

ericinboston

macrumors 68020
Jan 13, 2008
2,005
476
Lesser Evets said:
It's a logical step, but I doubt that Amazon's ability to craft a seductive table will be easy. Apple creates seductive devices that are well-designed and easy to use, making them infinitely more attractive to buyers.

I still like my books on paper. Kindle or iPad, I don't find 7,000+ words very enjoyable on either.

Give me iPad 5 when it all comes together in a powerful package with all the frills.
Click to expand...

1)Amazon's only created 1 other hardware device...the Kindle...and it rocks and blows away the iPad for e-reading. Hands down. I have complete faith that they will create a killer tablet (again, it will be version 1.0) to compete with iPad 2.0+. As someone said here, Amazon is not about the hardware...they are focusing on ease of use, design, etc...Apple is not the only company employing humans that can design something nice.

2)You state that "Apple creates seductive devices that are well-designed and easy to use, making them infinitely more attractive to buyers" yet you are waiting for version 5 of the iPad?! Which is it? If it's infinitely attractive, you (or others) wouldn't wait 5 years for version 5.

3)Yes, I agree that version 5 of the iPad will finally have everything (or mostly) what people want...features, price, performance, etc. iPad series/history will mirror the iPod history book of adoption.
 
Consultant

Consultant

macrumors G5
Jun 27, 2007
13,314
34
hexagonheat said:
Actually... yeah. It is one of Amazon's best selling, if not THE best selling product.

The Kindle App isn't great for reading on LED screens. Once you experience e-ink and read for 2+ hours or in sunlight then you'll understand. Plus battery life that is measured in weeks and not hours is pretty darn great as well as free wireless integration.
Click to expand...

Nope, last year Amazon was caught tweaking their top list to exclude competitor products.

How easy can you read Kindle when it's dark? Can Kindle play color videos? Or do more than one of these things? :rolleyes:
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1172347/

Small White Car said:
A company that figured out that what you actually do with a tablet matters more than the hardware specs?

This'll be the first competitor that Apple needs to worry about, I bet.
Click to expand...

Apple already beat Amazon in music.

I bet Apple puts in more R&D (and more quality R&D) than Amazon.
 
Surely

Surely

Guest
Oct 27, 2007
15,042
11
Los Angeles, CA
MrSmith said:
I'm still wondering the same about the iPad. I know people spent their hard earned cash on it, but what the hell anyone uses it for I have no idea.
Click to expand...

I just have one for the status. Y'know, to look cool.

I spend hours staring at it, and still can't figure out what to do with it.*

*just in case someone misses it, this post is thick with sarcasm
 
S

supmango

macrumors 6502
Feb 17, 2008
413
0
hcho3 said:
4 Million?

Unless they are pricing this thing around 200 dollars to compete with ipad 2, I don't see this happening. What OS will it run on... anyway?
Click to expand...

Windows or Android. I can't imagine this will be any more competitive than the Galaxy Tab.

I like the whole e-ink thing. I just don't see how it would be possible to use both e-ink and an LCD quality display in the same device (and keep it small enough to be usable). I think the kindle and the tablet will always appeal to two distinctly different users (or uses).
 
designaholic

designaholic

macrumors regular
Nov 10, 2007
239
30
Bristol, UK
deggs37 said:
Some of you should step outside of your apple bubble every once in a while. It may do you some good to get fresh non-apple controlled air. Yes there is life in electronics outside of the iWorld. People really do buy non apple things. I know, it's a crazy world we live in.
Click to expand...

I completely agree with you, but don't forget where we are here - it's not exactly the place for unbiased opinion!

Competition is *always* a good thing. Without a competitive drive, Apple wouldn't even be here.

Good luck to Amazon on this, lets hope they do a better job on the UI than Blackberry have.
 
nwcs

nwcs

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2009
2,722
5,262
Tennessee
Amazon's tablet will do well for sure. What I'm most interested in is seeing what happens 5 years from now. The market can't support a great deal of fragmentation. What I mean is stuff purchased with one vendor not working on another vendor's wares (I mean digital media, not apps). It really limiting. Even though Apple is in the lead they won't stay that way forever. Some kind of standardization seems inevitable just because of the investment people put in.
 
Bernard SG

Bernard SG

macrumors 65816
Jul 3, 2010
1,354
7
What I find most funny about Amazon's tablet is that it's coming to market just a couple weeks after it's raison d'être vanished as Apple relaxed it's AppStore policy (the whole in-app purchases controversy).
Anyway it's a big yawn. Nobody will care outside of the US. It's gonna be a niche product in a niche market.
 
nwcs

nwcs

macrumors 68030
Sep 21, 2009
2,722
5,262
Tennessee
designaholic said:
Competition is *always* a good thing. Without a competitive drive, Apple wouldn't even be here.
Click to expand...
I actually somewhat disagree with that common line of thought. Competition has its place but it also leads to cut corners, over emphasis on function over usability, bad manufacturing processes (environmentally, politically, socially), etc.

Healthy competition is good but most turns very unhealthy very quickly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom