Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,524
30,826



Last month, Samsung released a revised Galaxy Tab 10.1N design in Germany in hopes of avoiding an injunction barring the sale of the device under its original design over claims of infringement from Apple.

galaxy_tab_10_1n.jpg



Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1N
Arguing that the design changes did not go far enough, Apple quickly filed suit in an attempt to bar the new design as well. But according to Bloomberg, the judge in the new case does not seem inclined to support such an injunction, giving customers credit for being able to distinguish between the devices.
The Dusseldorf court that banned sales of the Galaxy 10.1 on Sept. 9 is unlikely to grant Apple an injunction against the Galaxy 10.1N, Presiding Judge Johanna Brueckner-Hofmann said at a hearing today. Samsung has changed the device's design sufficiently to distance it from the iPad, she said, adding that the view is preliminary. [...]

"Consumers are well aware that there is an original and that competitors try to use similar designs, so buyers are vigilant when looking at products," Brueckner-Hofmann said. "We don't think that someone buys a Samsung to make his table neighbor at the coffee house believe he owns an iPad."
A final decision on Apple's request is scheduled to be released on February 9.

After several early wins in its efforts to bar sales of Samsung's tablet devices, the tide has begun to turn against Apple in a number of locations. In Australia, where an injunction against the Galaxy Tab 10.1 has been lifted, Samsung is now using the legal fight to promote its device, calling the Galaxy Tab "the tablet Apple tried to stop".

Article Link: German Court Unlikely to Award Apple Injunction Against Galaxy Tab 10.1N
 

ChazUK

macrumors 603
Feb 3, 2008
5,393
25
Essex (UK)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.2.1; en-us; Xoom Build/HTK75D) AppleWebKit/534.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Safari/534.13)

Samsung should have made them all like that from the get go. Front facing, stereo speakers makes perfect sense to me not to do it.

Perhaps they should go for their own community design on this one?
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
As if anyone's really buying them in the first place.

Now it's got another problem (aside from running Android): it's fugly.
 

kdarling

macrumors P6
It was clear from the beginning that Apple's short term goal was to simply delay as much of Samsung's holiday sales as possible.

That's why Apple went for quickie injunctions using mostly untested and sometimes obscurely worded IP.

The injunctions often automatically began, and it took weeks or months to review the claimed IP to remove the injunction.

Legally, brilliant. PR wise, perhaps not so much. Apple is no longer seen as the underdog.
 

AJH1993

macrumors regular
Oct 26, 2011
154
0
I've said it once, I'll say it again. This thread is just going to end up in arguing. So have fun with that, mods.
 

kolax

macrumors G3
Mar 20, 2007
9,181
115
It gets said a lot, but can we have a separate forum for lawsuits? While I find this stuff interesting to read time to time, there's like a new thread everyday on it with minor details appearing on page 1.

There's one for the Mac and iOS, why not one for lawsuits too?
 

AJH1993

macrumors regular
Oct 26, 2011
154
0
Android - Prior to employing ex Apple IOS employees:

450px-Android_mobile_phone_platform_early_device.jpg

So what? If you want a direct copy of iOS look at chinese knockoff iPhones running Java-proprietary platforms. But until you come up with valid points as to how it is a ripoff, your argument is invalid.
 

The Great Boony

macrumors regular
Nov 23, 2010
195
0
So what? If you want a direct copy of iOS look at chinese knockoff iPhones running Java-proprietary platforms. But until you come up with valid points as to how it is a ripoff, your argument is invalid.

Its not an argument. Its fact, Android ripped off Apple and stole IOS.
 

ChazUK

macrumors 603
Feb 3, 2008
5,393
25
Essex (UK)
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.1; en-gb; Galaxy Nexus Build/ITL41F) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30)

AJH1993 said:
Android - Prior to employing ex Apple IOS employees:

450px-Android_mobile_phone_platform_early_device.jpg

So what? If you want a direct copy of iOS look at chinese knockoff iPhones running Java-proprietary platforms. But until you come up with valid points as to how it is a ripoff, your argument is invalid.

Some things are best ignored. ;)
 

GreyStreet

macrumors member
Nov 16, 2011
44
0
Its not an argument. Its fact, Android ripped off Apple and stole IOS.

If that's the case you wouldn't have Apple fanboys claiming Android is crap...can't have it both ways.

You obviously haven't used both because they are as dissimilar as they are the same.

But you post this same nonsense in every thread and it's been replied to several times, so you either don't bother to read or don't understand it, so what's the point?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.