Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Drunken Master

macrumors 65816
Jul 19, 2011
1,060
0
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Wireless charging?

Maybe kinetic charging like certain watches?
 

vartanarsen

macrumors 6502a
Jul 2, 2010
712
307
I thought the future is clear on this: wireless sync :confused:

Airplay is great, and so is wireless sync......but what about charging?

My toothbrush now uses a conductve charging mech in which i just lay it in a cradle without connections, and it just charges....
I cant imagine anything preventing the same type of conductive technology n the iPhone.

At that point, just use some sealant for the earphe jack and mic, and you have a seamless waterproof iPhone:))))) 2 glass panels and steel band, completely sealed off :)))
 

nagromme

macrumors G5
May 2, 2002
12,546
1,196
Lack of backwards accessory compatibility—even if adapters are available—is a problem.

And one that’s going to happen someday anyway—we can’t expect the same connector forever. That connector has been around since April 2003... nine years!

So whatever replaces it (to last another 9 years I hope)... small is good!

FWIW, I thought I read somewhere that Thunderbolt is not currently possible on iPad/iPhone because of the lack of PCI Express architecture. Don’t quote me...

Still, Thunderbolt can adapt to many purposes, and Apple might offer dock cables with Thunderbolt on the computer end. (I don’t see that being standard, though: USB will remain the standard bundled cable-end for now because everyone has it.) Anyway, while Thunderbolt speed would be nice for especially large syncs/restores, I find that in more ordinary use syncs are smaller, and therefore pretty fast (after iOS 5 especially) over USB. And of course it can all be wireless now.
 

SuprUsrStan

macrumors 6502a
Apr 15, 2010
715
1,015
How to charge?

nductive charging i guess. but i dont want to have to use a special case to charge. So i guess its up to Apple to make a inductive chargeable back plate.

any other ideas?

Just look at the palm pre. That phone was designed to be charged inductively without any attachments.
 

Shadyriley

macrumors 6502
Mar 27, 2009
328
0
It's gonna come with a Matt you just set the phone on. iPhone 5 is gonna e epic. QuaD Core, 12 megapixel camera, NFC, LTE, inductive charging
 

greasemuntney

macrumors newbie
Sep 18, 2011
7
0
The problem most have not thought about is if Apple does ONLY make it a charge only connection then JB-ing will be almost impossible. That would make for a different issue. I would love to see a Mag-Safe small connection but hope they keep it data transferable and not only a charge only connection.

Just my 2¢. But something to think about.
 

faroZ06

macrumors 68040
Apr 3, 2009
3,387
1
It's a few years overdue, better late than never. A big ugly relic finally redesigned. I knew Apple had the confidence to pull it off.

It's not really big and ugly. The new ones are very thin, especially compared to the old ones that have clips.
 

Lesser Evets

macrumors 68040
Jan 7, 2006
3,527
1,294
Had iDevices since iPod Day 1. I think this was the original, but I'm not sure: I remember no other connector. It's about time to change, and if they could make a micro connector, I'd be happy. Bring on better design.
 

Chupa Chupa

macrumors G5
Jul 16, 2002
14,835
7,396
The dock connector is used to charge the phone as well. You can't wirelessly sync a device that has no battery power. Additionally, wireless sync activates by default when it detects a power input.

It's not just a "dock" connector, it's power.

Unless Apple adopted inductive charging.
 

faroZ06

macrumors 68040
Apr 3, 2009
3,387
1
Had iDevices since iPod Day 1. I think this was the original, but I'm not sure: I remember no other connector. It's about time to change, and if they could make a micro connector, I'd be happy. Bring on better design.

Well, they did have the FireWire connectors that can only charge newer devices but cannot sync. That was actually a lot better because you got FireWire speed, not stupid USB.
 

pgiguere1

macrumors 68020
May 28, 2009
2,167
1,200
Montreal, Canada
Add Firewire support!

Get back 10 years!

HT1353_1.jpg
 

Spectrum Abuser

macrumors 65816
Aug 27, 2011
1,377
48
"We know that ever since the original iPhone came to be a very enormous problem has struck the minds of consumers. People put the dock a phone uses as the very first perspective. So what have we done to fix it? Well. We've gotten rid of the dock! And who wants a dock? You have to plug them in and take them out, yuke! So we're going to use something that we are all born to acknowledge. Gravity. With iPhone 5 you can just.. *Awkward positioning*.. Just put the device right down on this rubber pad. Not only does this pad charge the device from its four well concealed charging points, but it also starts an automatic sync with your Macintosh or Windows PC. It's beautiful."

A little scenario I thought of. :p
 

djrod

macrumors 65816
Sep 16, 2008
1,012
33
Madrid - Spain
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

That and the European standard of micro USB plug for all smartphones (simplifying power chargers) would imply a shift away from 30pin dock connectors.

Apple already compelled with that:

http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MD099?mco=MjU5MjAwODM
 

Nielsenius

macrumors 6502a
Apr 16, 2011
565
1
Virginia
There really needs to be an update to the way we charge and transfer data to and from our iPhones. It would be awesome if Apple added Thunderbolt support this summer!
 

jayhawk11

macrumors 6502a
Oct 19, 2007
775
283
For the love of god, they aren't going to add Thunderbolt any time soon. The flash memory maxes itself out on a USB cable. Thunderbolt is overkill.
 

MattInOz

macrumors 68030
Jan 19, 2006
2,760
0
Sydney
Bring on a MiniMagDock.

Yes please. It won't happen because Apple wants to keep its accessory ecosystem and be able to keep the $ rolling in, but wouldn't it be nice...

Apple could just charge for the works with Airplay DRM chip that still all the accessory maker would need to buy with no direct Audio/Video lines.
 
Last edited:

Lesser Evets

macrumors 68040
Jan 7, 2006
3,527
1,294
Well, they did have the FireWire connectors that can only charge newer devices but cannot sync. That was actually a lot better because you got FireWire speed, not stupid USB.

That's right! I forgot about the old FW. And you are right: I remember the joy of transfer with FW compared to the next phase of connector which was so slow. However, I switched from the "classic" form to the Nano soon after and then it wasn't a problem.

If someone has 20GB+ to transfer with these USB connectors, it must be hellish. Since the new style connector I tend to use iDevices with the minimum storage... and now I remember one reason why.

Get back 10 years!

Image
There it is. That brings back good memories. I kinda miss the old iPod. Those hard drives tended to freeze and thus die after exactly 2 years. Had 3 that did the freeze and I never got another with mechanical drive inside.


With wireless sync and future wireless charging abilities built-in, you'd think Apple would do away with the 30pin dock all together.
That would be excellent for the lower end devices like Shuffle and Nano and possibly the smaller iPT/iPhones, but I think wireless would be a hassle for larger devices. I't the perfect idea for Shuffle and Nano, though. It would be magical to wander the house and have the devices update without ever needing prompt or plug.
 

dokujaryu

macrumors 6502
May 3, 2011
359
12
Irvine, California
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I'm very excited about a new direction with charging and cables. I'd like to see some way to charge by traditional means so that products like the juice pack can continue to be produced. Also, I'm going to be kinda annoyed if every accessory requires bluetooth unless they double or tripple the battery life.
 
It's easy for someone like me to welcome the dock change with open arms...but Im sure many folks have spent some good coin on doc-station devices.

Anyways, given the current speaker design and how minimal the doc is...how much space could they really save?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.