Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,523
30,817



Apple has released its second update in two days to the OS X implementation of Java. The first update closed a vulnerability that has led to the infection of more than 600,000 Macs via a trojan horse. The infections have received increased media attention in the past day, including a splashed headline on the Drudge Report.

javaupdate.jpg



While yesterday's Java for OS X Lion 2012-001 update closed the vulnerability in Java 1.6.0_29, there's no indication what the new update -- called Java for OS X 2012-002 -- fixes. The update notes link to the same support document as update 2012-001.

Last year, Apple introduced a security update to OS X that would automatically remove malicious software from OS X installations. It isn't clear if the infected machines can be fixed via the internal OS X security mechanisms.

In OS X Mountain Lion, the next version of the OS X software that will be released this summer, Apple will include a feature called Gatekeeper. The new system relies not only on Mac App Store distribution as means of vetting apps, but also on a new "identified developer" program under which developers distributing their applications outside of the Mac App Store can register with Apple and receive a personalized certificate they can use to sign their applications. Apple can then use that system to track developers and disable their certificates if malicious activity is detected.

Article Link: Apple Releases Second Update to Java in Two Days
 

-LikesMac-

macrumors 6502
Jun 20, 2010
429
23
Amazing

I went back to the main page after reading the article about 600K Macs being infected. Wow, Apple's upped their game here against this kind of thing. :D
 

Westside guy

macrumors 603
Oct 15, 2003
6,340
4,158
The soggy side of the Pacific NW
While yesterday's Java for OS X Lion 2012-001 update closed the vulnerability in Java 1.6.0_29, there's no indication what the new update -- called Java for OS X 2012-002 -- fixes.

It's not unknown for a company to patch a patch if they discover the first patch had issues - just off the top of my head I can remember past instances where Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, and Mozilla did that.
 

Delighted

macrumors 6502
Feb 25, 2012
253
1
yay patch! something oh so satisfying when you download a new patch, I just love them!

----------

It's not unknown for a company to patch a patch if they discover the first patch had issues - just off the top of my head I can remember past instances where Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, and Mozilla did that.

I agree, it happens all the time. but i love downloading patches :D
 

HishamAkhtar

macrumors 6502a
Oct 22, 2011
510
1
So eventually all software will have to be downloaded from the App Store.

Jail-broken Macs? Who would have thought it.
 

MarkMS

macrumors 6502a
Aug 30, 2006
992
0
Straight from Apple's Java mailing list. Just an issue with Xcode and App Loader in OS X Lion. Snow Leopard users don't need the tiny update.

Java developers,

Today we re-shipped our Java 1.6.0_31 for OS X Lion today to address a critical issue we found in Xcode and the Application Loader tool. This new "Java for OS X 2012-002" package is effectively identical to "Java for OS X 2012-001", with the exception of a few symlinks and version numbers.

For the sake of expediency, we have re-rolled the automatic update as our standard full combo updater, with the hope that most users have not yet been presented with 2012-001. We considered creating a delta update for users who already installed 001, but that would have made the process of getting these fixes to you take longer.

We apologize for the inconvenience, and would like to offer our thanks to the developers who caught this issue and reported it to us as quickly as they did. This issue only impacts Lion users, so Snow Leopard users have nothing to reinstall.

Over the next few days, we will catch up with producing updated release notes, tech notes, and developer packages with the revised 002 version numbers.

Manual download links:
Java for OS X 2012-002: <http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1515>
Java for Mac OS X 10.6 Update 7: <http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1516>
 

handel30

macrumors member
Jul 25, 2011
64
0
Miami, Florida
Infected??

Hi. Can you guys tell me whether you think my Macbook got infected? Yesterday I did a search for "msnbc live feed online." Two of the results were websites called zahipedia.info.com and the other epctv.com. I can't remember which of the two it was (I think the latter), but, when I went to it, a small window popped up telling me that I should clean my computer of junk. I clicked OK to get rid of the window, then Safari froze up. I couldn't even quit it until I forced quit it via Finder. Could this have infected my computer? My Macbook is fairly new and, as far as I know, free of junk. Is epctv a dangerous site? Why did it tell me I had junk? How would I find out if I got infected? Thanks.
 

Dragado

macrumors member
Mar 29, 2012
34
0
It's also Friday the 6th right now.

Does this mean the world's going to end again? I don't think I can take another world ending; I may die of laughter.

Hi. Can you guys tell me whether you think my Macbook got infected? Yesterday I did a search for "msnbc live feed online." Two of the results were websites called zahipedia.info.com and the other epctv.com. I can't remember which of the two it was (I think the latter), but, when I went to it, a small window popped up telling me that I should clean my computer of junk. I clicked OK to get rid of the window, then Safari froze up. I couldn't even quit it until I forced quit it via Finder. Could this have infected my computer? My Macbook is fairly new and, as far as I know, free of junk. Is epctv a dangerous site? Why did it tell me I had junk? How would I find out if I got infected? Thanks.

By the way, laws of computing 101: The OK button agrees to something, the Cancel/close window button disagrees. If you click OK, know what you're saying OK to.

EDIT: In other words, stop using it to close windows.
 

LarryC

macrumors 6502
Jul 19, 2002
419
33
North America
This isn't showing in my Software Update. I'm on a CD MacBook running Snow Leopard. Could this be why?

Are users of Snow Leopard effected by this latest attack? I'm running Snow Leopard, too. When I ran software update (just a few minutes ago) all I had to download was a 7.9MB update for some type of camera. I suppose that Apple will get around to addressing the older OS's as soon as they can. What was this attack doing to computers? And lastly, are the iOS devices also effected?
 

faroZ06

macrumors 68040
Apr 3, 2009
3,387
1
Only on Mac OS will the system updates actually remove malware for you. Apple has obviously been preparing for the malware attacks (not viruses) they will get if they become popular.

I guess this is a reason to stay updated. However, I'm so out of date that the malware will not be compatible with my PC :D
 

MarkMS

macrumors 6502a
Aug 30, 2006
992
0
Are users of Snow Leopard effected by this latest attack? I'm running Snow Leopard, too. When I ran software update (just a few minutes ago) all I had to download was a 7.9MB update for some type of camera. I suppose that Apple will get around to addressing the older OS's as soon as they can. What was this attack doing to computers? And lastly, are the iOS devices also effected?

Yes, SL is vulnerable even more than typical OS X Lion users, because SL had Java preinstalled. Apple removed it in OS X Lion like they did with Flash a year or so ago so users have to go to Adobe's site to get the latest version. Are you sure you haven't downloaded it yet? I just updated my old MacBook Pro with Snow Leopard and it was in Software Update.app. Check /Applications/Utilities/Java Preferences and make sure the version is 1.6.0_31. The vulnerable version of Java is 1.6.0_29, I believe.

Hi. Can you guys tell me whether you think my Macbook got infected? Yesterday I did a search for "msnbc live feed online." Two of the results were websites called zahipedia.info.com and the other epctv.com. I can't remember which of the two it was (I think the latter), but, when I went to it, a small window popped up telling me that I should clean my computer of junk. I clicked OK to get rid of the window, then Safari froze up. I couldn't even quit it until I forced quit it via Finder. Could this have infected my computer? My Macbook is fairly new and, as far as I know, free of junk. Is epctv a dangerous site? Why did it tell me I had junk? How would I find out if I got infected? Thanks.


Probably not infected, unless you surf a lot of shady sites. Go here: http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/trojan-downloader_osx_flashback_i.shtml and follow their manual removal instructions. If you follow steps 1-3 and skip to 8 and you get those two error messages, then you are NOT infected.

Also if you use OS X 10.7 Lion and didn't download Java, you should not be infected with this trojan. If you use Lion w/ Java installed or Snow Leopard (10.6) which comes with Java preinstalled, you will want to follow those F-secure instructions to check if you have the trojan.

Don't forget to go to Safari>Preferences>Security tab>unclick "Enable Java".

Hope this helps!
 
Last edited:

adamw

macrumors 6502a
Sep 22, 2006
749
1,821
As I had a Mac that was infected with this trojan, and removed it yesterday when news came out about this, I appreciate Apple diligently putting out this 2nd Java update to help protect users. Thanks also for the above Java mailing list description from Apple posted of why they re-released the Java update.
 

faroZ06

macrumors 68040
Apr 3, 2009
3,387
1
I'm guessing that Apple is trying to put shame on Java as a bad standard by making it not come with Lion? It seems pretty vulnerable and inefficient, but there is no alternative. Java works on everything!

----------

Are users of Snow Leopard effected by this latest attack? I'm running Snow Leopard, too. When I ran software update (just a few minutes ago) all I had to download was a 7.9MB update for some type of camera. I suppose that Apple will get around to addressing the older OS's as soon as they can. What was this attack doing to computers? And lastly, are the iOS devices also effected?

First, to answer one of your questions, iOS is not affected since it does not have Java on it (unless you jailbreak).

Also, does anyone know if Leopard is vulnerable to this? I highly doubt that I'll get any malware since I am very experienced, but I'm just wondering.
 

Westside guy

macrumors 603
Oct 15, 2003
6,340
4,158
The soggy side of the Pacific NW
Only on Mac OS will the system updates actually remove malware for you.

Actually Microsoft Windows has included a "Malicious Software Removal Tool" with every Patch Tuesday release set for the past several years - On XP, Vista, and Windows 7. By default it downloads and runs automatically.

I agree it's a good thing - it's just that Apple's not the only one doing it. :D
 

Morod

macrumors 68000
Jan 1, 2008
1,756
738
On The Nickel, over there....
Hi. Can you guys tell me whether you think my Macbook got infected? Yesterday I did a search for "msnbc live feed online." Two of the results were websites called zahipedia.info.com and the other epctv.com. I can't remember which of the two it was (I think the latter), but, when I went to it, a small window popped up telling me that I should clean my computer of junk. I clicked OK to get rid of the window, then Safari froze up. I couldn't even quit it until I forced quit it via Finder. Could this have infected my computer? My Macbook is fairly new and, as far as I know, free of junk. Is epctv a dangerous site? Why did it tell me I had junk? How would I find out if I got infected? Thanks.

To find out if you're infected, do this:


Originally Posted by Sirolway
What's the easiest way to determine if you're infected?...


In terminal run:
Quote:
defaults read /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Info LSEnvironment
You should get this error:
Quote:
The domain/default pair of (/Applications/Safari.app/Contents/Info, LSEnvironment) does not exist
Then run:
Quote:
defaults read ~/.MacOSX/environment DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES
You should get this error:
Quote:
The domain/default pair of (/Users/YOURUSER/.MacOSX/environment, DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES) does not exist


You can copy and paste the two commands into Terminal. To open Terminal, go to Finder>Applications>Utilities>Terminal. Double click on Terminal. Hit enter after each command.
Just be careful when using Terminal. It's one of the few places where you can really mess up your computer.
 

faroZ06

macrumors 68040
Apr 3, 2009
3,387
1
No, just turn Gatekeeper off. Its just there as protection for the uneducated.

Yep, Apple would never lock up the Mac. Gatekeeper is meant to prevent those who cannot go to System Preferences and disable it from downloading any apps that aren't safe. It's a good idea.

However, I think the uneducated should just be using iPads instead of full-on PCs. We're getting an iPad 2 for our grandma so she can do everything without getting stuck in a mess. I know someone who payed a lot of money to get her Mac cleaned of viruses... my guess is that she got ripped off.
 

macsmurf

macrumors 65816
Aug 3, 2007
1,200
948
I went back to the main page after reading the article about 600K Macs being infected. Wow, Apple's upped their game here against this kind of thing. :D

Java 6 update 31 for Windows and Linux was released february 27 in reponse to this vulnerability. Apple releases it April 3 - and they apparently still messed it up.

If that's upping their game I'd hate to see their previous game.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.