I tend to disagree.With Jobs calling it "the simplest user interface you could imagine", speculation immediately leapt to Siri, which could allow users to change channels and find shows using only their voice.
That says nothing.The idea of a Siri-enabled television set quickly gained steam with a followup rumor from The New York Times claiming that Apple was indeed working on such a device for a launch in late 2012 or 2013.
I don't know if Apple can expect consumers to pay a premium for a TV like this. Nowadays, you can get a (good brand) 40" TV for around £350 - and I don't think consumers would want to pay any higher than this.
Well the Apple logo is basically what your paying for though?Can almost guarantee there won't be a silver apple on the front. All you'll be able to see is the display. Elegant, simple, and gorgeous.
While I love Apple and all, this seems like a market that isn't in as much of a need of an overhaul as the tablet/phone markets were.
That being said, I think this is a good benchmark to compare a currently fictional Apple TV to. http://www.samsung.com/uk/consumer/tv-audio-video/television/led-tv/UE55ES8000UXXU
Then again, we've all been wrong in the past and Apple loves to wow us with things we didn't know we wanted in the first place. Just seems to me like they're going to be facing some very stiff competition in TVs beyond what they've seen in any recent ventures.
Can almost guarantee there won't be a silver apple on the front. All you'll be able to see is the display. Elegant, simple, and gorgeous.
I doubt it's going to be made out of aluminum, that's going to be too heavy. It has to be ultra thin and light like modern LED tvs.
I don't know if Apple can expect consumers to pay a premium for a TV like this. Nowadays, you can get a (good brand) 40" TV for around £350 - and I don't think consumers would want to pay any higher than this.
Siri enabled? Pass...
Multi Touch remote. End of story. Place my bet now!
I wonder how long after it released Samsung will offer something similar with the exact same features but with a rounder bezel claiming its completely different?
I doubt it's going to be made out of aluminum, that's going to be too heavy. It has to be ultra thin and light like modern LED tvs.
I think I remember a similar comment about an obscure product called....what was it now....iPhone I think. Some such device...
----------
I already use my iPad 3 with my iBackFlip Somersault and Apple TV using airplay to do the same thing. Hands free too.
EDIT: For those who were asking what is a Somersault: http://ibackflip.com
I wonder how long after it released Samsung will offer something similar with the exact same features but with a rounder bezel claiming its completely different?
This is easy. You have to "call" it. If there's only one person in the room, there's no need to call the TV. As soon as the second person walks into the room, the proper protocol is to call it. Once the TV is called, only that person's voice will be able to control the TV. Once that person leaves, the remaining people in the room will need to call the TV to obtain control.I really don't know about the idea of controlling the TV by using Siri. It just seems like a bit of a flawed idea as soon as there is more than one person in the room who may be talking at the same time.
More importantly, how would I make sure the power of controlling the programme being watched stays with me!?
But how can you control say your Satellite or Cable box with Siri. What about your Blu-Ray player. Even if Apple wants to try and ignore that people still subscribe to TV or watch DVDs or Blu-Rays, they have to be thinking of a way to 'control it all'. Or at least making it less complicated... even if only a select amount of devices / models can be controlled via HDMI it would be a start.
I doubt it's going to be made out of aluminum, that's going to be too heavy. It has to be ultra thin and light like modern LED tvs.
More importantly, how would I make sure the power of controlling the programme being watched stays with me!?