Requires a hack in Mac OSX, but a simple setting in Windows....not surprised.
Right. But in Windows it gets you to an unworkable screen set up.
Requires a hack in Mac OSX, but a simple setting in Windows....not surprised.
With this software can you still use the drop down resolution change feature?
View attachment 344445
If so, it would be super handy when using applications like Gimp, or other legacy photo / video applications that are not retna aware.
Wait. What?
This post makes no sense at all. Of course you can see more detail when you have 4x the pixels. That's the whole point of a high PPI display.
Actually, this is apple's description in the rMBP specs:
Supported resolutions: 2880 by 1800 pixels (Retina); scaled resolutions: 1920 by 1200, 1680 by 1050, 1280 by 800, and 1024 by 640 pixels
So if you can't set it to 2880x1800 directly without the hack, then the specs are false.
Lawyers have sued over much, much less. (eg. the recent fine from the Aussie government).
http://smarticus.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Fullscreen.jpg
All you'll see is a big image.
You clearly have self-confidence issues. You should seek professional help.
Just saved this shot and displayed it fullscreen and aspect ratio correct on my 24" monitor. It was completely and totally unbearable. Sharp? Sure. I guess the tightly packed pixels of the retina screen would make it possible to read a word roughly the length of the nail on my pinky finger, but...why?
If it's too small on my biggish monitor, I can't imagine how horrible it would be on a 15" screen. It's a neat little feature to show off, but it sure as hell isn't good for anything else but.
Um, this is what the retina display does by default.
How can you make the font size bigger without making the UI elements that contain the fonts bigger as well?
i'm sure you would edit photos on 2880x1800 on a 15" screen. For one it looks like %$#% and you would not see any detail. Some people just think cause it's 2880x1800 it's some superior thing.....well IT's NOT. This laptop does not impress me at
i'm sure you would edit photos on 2880x1800 on a 15" screen. For one it looks like %$#% and you would not see any detail. Some people just think cause it's 2880x1800 it's some superior thing.....well IT's NOT. This laptop does not impress me at all.
----------
You are just like me, I love 1920 on a 15", but when you get your Retina mbp and bump to 2880 you will see what I mean. I love high resolution so I wish it wasn't the case but you will see for yourself soon enough.
Once you have a Retina Macbook Pro and try to edit a photo on 2880x1800 you will understand. The screen does not look like some super sexy high res machine @ 2880 that is why Apple limited it in the first place. At that resolution if anything it looks more grainy and washed out.
Of course it doesn't impress you, you aren't a creative professional or someone who appreciates visual media. My DSLR resolves 18million pixels. On this laptop I can see approx 5million of those pixels, on the non retina only approx 1.5 million.
How is being able to see more of my image without having to professionally print a bad thing?
I suggest you stick to 1024x720 screens since you obviously don't require anything better, the rest of us that appreciate will tick will retina tyvm.
I dont get it, the desktop is normally 1440x900, I guess doubled up? So why not just use a normal 1440x900screen in it?
on the retina macs, we don't have the option to show it in the menubar anymore.
I really don't understand where this "1440x900" nonsense comes from [...] the UI elements are doubled in size
but your actual content (think of a picture in preview.app for example) is using the added resolution, i.e.: your picture is showing at 2880x1800 (minus maybe the menu bar pixels, etc.), not at 1440x900.
Why is everyone obsessed with changing the resolution of the retina mbp? I prefer to see things the correct size...
Once you have a Retina Macbook Pro and try to edit a photo on 2880x1800 you will understand. The screen does not look like some super sexy high res machine @ 2880 that is why Apple limited it in the first place. At that resolution if anything it looks more grainy and washed out.
this is great for editing screen captures actually...
now you can capture the screen at 1800p and do a close up of a detail at 1080p without seeing the pixels.
There's a good reason for that. Changing the "resolution" on your Retina Mac does not actually switch the panel's resolution. You're still displaying at 2880x1800, it's just the frame buffer and the scaling factor that is modified.
----------
There you go. Seems you understand just fine.
That's not quite true, or webpages would look very very wrong in Safari and other browsers.
Images that are not "retina" are upscaled, and thus you're only getting the 1440x900 of usable real-estate.