Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AppleTV 3 Tested: 60fps 1080p
- Thread starter Mr Dobey
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
60 Hz at least. It plays back 60 fps video footage just fine. Dunno if it can play back faster footage.
Just curious because the 120fps got me thinking of 120Hz TV screens and how it would be nice to see how 120fps vs 60fps would look on my MacBook Pro if it could support it.
Off topic yes, but on the topic of high fps and stuff:
There are TV's now that physically refresh at 120Hz right? I know there's some phonies out there that only refresh at 60Hz and use interpolation to make it look smooth for advertising '120Hz, 240Hz etc...'
Off topic yes, but on the topic of high fps and stuff:
There are TV's now that physically refresh at 120Hz right? I know there's some phonies out there that only refresh at 60Hz and use interpolation to make it look smooth for advertising '120Hz, 240Hz etc...'
Yup, a lot of 3D-with-glasses screens are truly 120 Hz (without interpolation) so that each eye could see its part of the broadcast at 60 fps:
"When LCD shutter glasses are used for stereo 3D displays, the effective refresh rate is halved, because each eye needs a separate picture. For this reason, it is usually recommended to use a display capable of at least 120 Hz, because divided in half this rate is again 60 Hz. Higher refresh rates result in greater image stability, for example 72 Hz non-stereo is 144 Hz stereo, and 90 Hz non-stereo is 180 Hz stereo. Unfortunately most computer graphics cards and monitors cannot handle these high refresh rates, especially at higher resolutions."
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refresh_rate )
Last edited:
Nerdly addendum, but to compare computer screens with my TV, help:
I have a 120Hz HDTV and a standard iMac display. So is what I'm reading from you guys that 120Hz=120fps and 60Hz=60fps?
I have a 120Hz HDTV and a standard iMac display. So is what I'm reading from you guys that 120Hz=120fps and 60Hz=60fps?
Could someone explain to me the point of playing videos at more than 30fps? It will appear smooth to the human eye at around 25fps anyway...
Not to resurrect an old thread, but I've noticed that the Apple TV must be technically capable of playing 60fps. When you take a 30fps show and speed it up by hitting forward on the remote, the playback appears to be at 60fps.
The Apple TV doesn't drop frames to speed up the playback. Instead it plays the 30fps at 60fps, meaning it must be capable of 60fps playback, so apple could theoretically enable 60fps playback with a software update.
Food for thought.
The Apple TV doesn't drop frames to speed up the playback. Instead it plays the 30fps at 60fps, meaning it must be capable of 60fps playback, so apple could theoretically enable 60fps playback with a software update.
Food for thought.
Nevertheless, it's incapable of decoding a true 60p h.264 stream. Computationally, it's much harder to do than just playing back a 24p/30p stream with double the framerate as the CPU / GPU in the ATV3 is pretty underpowered.
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
Isn't this interesting relative to this thread topic:
Why allow it to be shot at 60fps if not played back at 60fps? Maybe we'll see something here at or after the iOS 7 launch?
TV4? Or does the "3" have the horses if the software was evolved? I bet the former.
Why allow it to be shot at 60fps if not played back at 60fps? Maybe we'll see something here at or after the iOS 7 launch?
TV4? Or does the "3" have the horses if the software was evolved? I bet the former.I predict an aTV4, maybe beefed up a bit but definitely with "ac" capability, so you can stream all those 4k movies, tv feeds and play those new games using some new controllers developed using the new API's.Isn't this interesting relative to this thread topic:
Why allow it to be shot at 60fps if not played back at 60fps? Maybe we'll see something here at or after the iOS 7 launch?
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
There's also that push for 4K at Apple. I find it so hard to dream about that leap given how long Apple stuck with 720p but I guess one should throw that into the mix too. There are consumer 4K TVs available now. There is no mainstream distribution medium for much 4K media now. And while I can imagine thousands of posts of "crashing the internet", "until everyone has sufficient bandwidth", "the chart", "I can't see the difference", etc (all of the same old arguments pro-720p until Apple went with 1080p), I wonder if there could be some play with that too?
TV4: 4K, 60fps, wifi ac, maybe H.265? Wow THAT would be hottt! Jump right over the BD argument of superior video quality and hopefully address the audio side of things too (something better than 1992's Dolby Digital). Hottt!
Can I have an app store too? Sings "Like a good neighbor... State Farm is there"
Now back to probable reality:TV4, thinner & lighter (neither of which matters for a device that pretty much never goes anywhere), wifi ac, another year of hoping the "hobby" gets some dedicated attention.
I think I'll just prefer the bigger dream.
TV4: 4K, 60fps, wifi ac, maybe H.265? Wow THAT would be hottt! Jump right over the BD argument of superior video quality and hopefully address the audio side of things too (something better than 1992's Dolby Digital). Hottt!Can I have an app store too? Sings "Like a good neighbor... State Farm is there"
Now back to probable reality:
TV4, thinner & lighter (neither of which matters for a device that pretty much never goes anywhere), wifi ac, another year of hoping the "hobby" gets some dedicated attention. I think I'll just prefer the bigger dream.
Last edited:
Ok...so maybe I was being a little optimistic.There's also that push for 4K at Apple. I find it so hard to dream about that leap given how long Apple stuck with 720p but I guess one should throw that into the mix too. There are consumer 4K TVs available now. There is no mainstream distribution medium for much 4K media now. And while I can imagine thousands of posts of "crashing the internet", "until everyone has sufficient bandwidth", "the chart", "I can't see the difference", etc (all of the same old arguments pro-720p until Apple went with 1080p), I wonder if there could be some play with that too?
Can I have an app store too? Sings "Like a good neighbor... State Farm is there"
Now back to probable reality:
I think I'll just prefer the bigger dream.
Digging up an old thread here, but I have been trying to get my ATV3 to display a smooth framerate in this manner from a similar source. As above it's a 1080i 29.97fps source.
I have had mixed results though - if I just encode a 2 minute chapter of the Blu-Ray then it kind of works. By "kind of" I mean it plays smoothly for a few seconds, then freezes, then smoothly, then freezes, but if I then restart the file from the beginning it seems to play smoothly all the way through.
However, I encoded a 2 hour Blu-Ray with the same settings and it never settles down, i.e. it is always smooth for a couple of seconds, then freezes, then smooth again, then freezes, etc. Restarting the playback from the beginning makes no difference in this case.
I've tried various different profiles, levels, settings etc to try and reduce the load on the ATV3 when decoding but I suspect that while there is nothing in iTunes or the Apple TV to prevent *attempting* to play these videos it's obviously a little hit and miss as to whether it actually works, presumably the processing power just isn't quite there for it to be officially supported and working 100% of the time for all encodes. I'd be interested if the OP had success with longer encodes than the 2 minute sample?
However, I've just found that my 2 minute sample will play smoothly all the way through first time if I downscale it to 720p as part of the Handbrake encode (with all other settings unchanged). I will try the full 2 hours next to see if this also works. In this case (a ballet Blu-Ray for my daughter), the increased smoothness in the performance of the dancers more than outweighs any slight decrease in resolution going from 1080 to 720.
By the way, one final thing I tried was to disable the de-interlacing but as I kind of expected it won't even let me copy it to iTunes. I had a hope that it would let me and then the Apple TV would be able to decode it.
Anyway, here's hoping the any ATV4 adds the necessary power to properly support 50/60fps progressive decoding!
Now that the iPhone 6 officially shoots 1080p60 you can bet the next release of Apple TV will support it. If the iPhone 6S gets a camera sensor with a larger pixel count that supports 4K recording than one could probably expect 4K support from the ATV4. But my guess is that Apple may wait until HDMI 2.0 is more common so 4K60p could also be implemented.
Yeah that would make sense.
By the way, in case anyone is interested, and further to my post above, I discovered that the ATV3 will play my 2 hour 720p59.94 rip with no issues. I used the exact same settings other than reducing the size, ie the ATV 3 Handbrake preset, Bob de-interlacing and framerate set to 59.94 and it's silky smooth.
I've got a real issue with being forced to watch something with 50/60fps source (or interlaced 50/60 fields) at half the framerate. I can tell it a mile away!
Mr Dobey did you ever run into the issue I described above with the motion freezing every few seconds or have you been able to rip to 1080p59.94 from your 1080i sources and have it work every time? I'm curious as to whether my settings are different somehow. I'm no doubt using a later version of Handbrake since you started this thread and the ATV3 firmware has been revised a few times since then I think too.