Fortunately there will be at least one version in its current form to support the latest iDevices in the event iTunes 11 looks and runs like a turd.
How would the separate app concept work for Windows users? Apple would be stuck with development and maintenance of even more apps.Then they should bring that separated app concept to OSX. IOS device syncing is less important in the wake of iCloud, but I would still include it by having each OSX app handle the syncing of its type of content to the device.
The problem with iTunes is that it's against Apples typical app design: typically their apps are focused on one thing (e.g. iPhoto for photos, iTunes for music, mail for email, notes for notes, etc).
iTunes does loads of stuff totally unrelated to music - it's the gateway to all digital purchasable content through the iTunes Store; so apps, books & movies go there, too. It's also the place to manage your iOS devices (their apps, books, movies, contacts and settings and backups and everything else).
Then they should bring that separated app concept to OSX. IOS device syncing is less important in the wake of iCloud, but I would still include it by having each OSX app handle the syncing of its type of content to the device.
So, you want 8+ apps open in order to sync with your iOS device? Seems a lot more complicated.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet...
PING IS DEAD!
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet...
PING IS DEAD!
You don't need all the apps open. Does iTunes require iPhoto to be open to sync photos? No.
What you'd have is an app solely dedicated to syncing your iOS devices, and like iTunes currently does with iPhoto, it'd pull all the necessary information from the media apps that it needs. Much simpler, and a far smaller memory footprint.
Except that's not what the poster said that I was responding to. He said he would have "each OSX app handle the syncing of its type of content to the device."
I understand what you are proposing, and I like it in theory. However, one problem is that all media isn't easy to separate into separate apps. There are overlaps that complicate things. Do music videos go in Music or Video? Do videos from your camera go in iPhoto or the Movie app? Where do ringtones go? Audiobooks vs iBooks. Podcasts can be audio or video.
And then you have the biggest problem pointed out by pdjudd. How do you manage all of these different apps on Windows? Because the majority of iOS device users are on Windows.
I watched the iTunes segment of the keynote last night, and there is a part where he clicks "Songs" in the new iTunes, and they show up as a list, which can be sorted by Album or Time or Artist via the columns. He didn't show whether the Genres/Artists/Albums boxes above the list can be made available again, but I assume they can.
It was just so surreal watching him talk about "improving the way you listen to music." Is this a joke? iTunes plays music. Everybody can listen to their music in iTunes. There is absolutely nothing to improve there. This drive to constantly change thinks makes them look a little insane sometimes, because he's standing up there saying "a great new way to do this.. and we've notice people like to do that.. and bla bla bla" and I'm thinking, wait a minute! When I open iTunes, all my stuff is right there, laid out neatly, and I can listen to or watch anything I want with a click of the mouse.
This is insane!
I was looking at things from an Apple development point of view - more apps is just way more development - for apps that would be inherently more complicated as individuals. Same issue though...And then you have the biggest problem pointed out by pdjudd. How do you manage all of these different apps on Windows? Because the majority of iOS device users are on Windows.
Ah, I see what you're saying now. I, like many other, just wish running iTunes didn't make the rest of my not-brand-new MacBook Pro come to a crawl. The first idea that always comes to our minds is, "Divide the app." iTunes is currently taking up 26.7% of my memory just playing music.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned this yet...
PING IS DEAD!
So, you want 8+ apps open in order to sync with your iOS device?
Don't really agree with this being called "wireless sync" since you need to be plugged into power and connected to Wi-Fi. It's not exactly wireless, but it get's the job done. I honestly don't find it any easier to just plug in my phone than to plug it into the computer. I mean, really, what's the difference?
That's a bit shortsighted. The main areas that Apple has worked on improving is discoverability of music in your library and the ability to dynamically create playlists. Obviously, if all you want to do is listen to a specific song or album, there's not much to improve.
For example the "Up Next" feature is a convenient way to manage upcoming songs, so you can preemptively skip songs before they start to play. Kind of like the DJ playlist, but easier to use and better integrated into the basic workflow.
Yes, I will be using the Up Next feature myself... but the way they speak is as if people weren't able to listen to their music until this update.
None of these updates are important or necessary. They're little gimmicks that are like "hey cool, I can do that now!" and have no impact on happiness in life at all.
And I don't like the playlist thing. All my playlists are right now permanently displayed on the left side of iTunes, and I can drag anything into any of them. Again, what's to improve?
That's just a strawman. No one has implied anything of the sort. Your own quotes spoke only of improvements.
Speak for yourself. Removing minor annoyances increases my happiness.
The "Up Next" feature is the dynamically generated playlist that I was referring to! From your previous statement, it seems that you find it a useful improvement.
Or just a simple "sync" app that syncs everything.