Just because someone is a purist doesn't mean they're a good photographer. It's an expression of taste, not of talent.
That said, can you direct me to a single photo from a so-called "purist" that is worse than any of those? They are very tacky pictures.
In terms of a purist I was implying about the individuals who totally dismiss the obscure and niche photographic genre's and who just tend to follow the typical norms. I'm not like that I love experimenting with different techniques. I'm currently in the process of learning The Brenizer Method for some wedding clients of mine.
If my photos were as you say "Tacky" they wouldn't get all the positive feedback that they get now would they or my work wouldn't have been exhibited now would it?
Lets see some examples of your work and lets see how it stacks up
Photography defines me, but most of all I enjoy it. Its a good relief agent from University Study.
I find it rather amusing that someone can slander my work on a forum after only looking at a couple of my projects.
You may think my HDR's are tacky, but the majority of those photos baring "one" have not been edited at all, The shots have all been complied into a single image in Photomatix pro out of many exposures. Thats how they turn out when fully completed.
Last edited: