I respect the letter. Despite some obvious spin.
Such as: As time progressed, we wanted to provide our customers with even better Maps including features such as turn-by-turn directions, voice integration, Flyover and vector-based maps. In order to do this, we had to create a new version of Maps from the ground up.
No - they could have re-negotiated with Google. They chose not to. No harm/no foul - but that doesn't mean they HAD to. Err on omission of truth.
In just over a week, iOS users with the new Maps have already searched for nearly half a billion locations.
I wonder how many of those searches are legit vs people trying to show how bad Apple Maps is.
What makes you think it wasn't the truth? Do you have any evidence that Apple could have reasonably enabled features like Flyover and vector-based maps with Google maps?