I would think about ditching my iPad 3 if the Mini had a retina screen.
Still no interest in owning one.
But not quad density to simplify the software to pixel doubling.Amazon managed it. Google managed over 300ppi with stunning displays on their Nexus 7 and Nexus 10.
Apple could have done it if they wanted to
But the Ipad 4 is now out - you have an obsolete tablet.
The blogosphere is full of fans drooling over everything Apple - of course we expected loving reviews.
Do we believe them? Not so much....
You haven't tried Imaps, then....
The reason everyone is upset about the resolution is because the mini is priced too high for the quality of the product. Why spend $329 on the mini when you could spend $379 for a retina iPad.
Wow some biased reviews. I guess some don't want to be band from Apple events or want Apple to mention them in the key note. Point blank its a nicer design but specs wise and no retina is a rip off.
Yeah, except they didn't, really. Managing to sell a product at or below its cost isn't really a feat of business or engineering mastery. If they had managed to cover all costs and turn a profit and deliver that same hardware for the same price, that would be something else entirely.Amazon managed it. Google managed over 300ppi with stunning displays on their Nexus 7 and Nexus 10.
Sure, and Google could sell the Nexus 7 for $7 if they wanted to. It's not really about that.Apple could have done it if they wanted to
Seems like they did. Everything about the iPad mini is an improvement on the iPad 2, which still scores well inside the pack. You're getting an equal or better product in every way for $329 for something that a year and a half ago cost $499. There's plenty that's appealing about that.Obviously they needed to make a profit with it. And doing that required a series of business decisions and compromises. But once they went with no Retina, they really needed to find another way to make it appealing.
A retina display actually can be a huge disadvantage from an engineering and cost standpoint, since it spirals quickly into a major headache. A retina display, beyond the major expense of the panel itself, needs a much more powerful backlight and a beefier GPU, needing a bigger battery, which is bigger and heavier. No doubt it'd be a huge plus to have in the mini, but what you'd have to give up in return really makes for a less appealing product.No way is retina a disadvantage. Every other phone and tablet screen looks like crap once you've had retina.
Amazon managed it. Google managed over 300ppi with stunning displays on their Nexus 7 and Nexus 10.
Apple could have done it if they wanted to
"If you want to save $50 and buy a cheap-ass tablet, go ahead. If you want quality the iPad mini will be waiting for you when you come to your senses."
Here, let me clarify what he meant. He meant the reviews are biased, which they are a little. The meaning of biased can be found by typing "Define: biased" in google.
Yeah, except they didn't, really. Managing to sell a product at or below its cost isn't really a feat of business or engineering mastery. If they had managed to cover all costs and turn a profit and deliver that same hardware for the same price, that would be something else entirely.
Sure, and Google could sell the Nexus 7 for $7 if they wanted to. It's not really about that.
These are big companies with different business models and product profiles, making complex decisions. I don't think either will be unsuccessful.
Seems like they did. Everything about the iPad mini is an improvement on the iPad 2, which still scores well inside the pack. You're getting an equal or better product in every way for $329 for something that a year and a half ago cost $499. There's plenty that's appealing about that.
A retina display actually can be a huge disadvantage from an engineering and cost standpoint, since it spirals quickly into a major headache. A retina display, beyond the major expense of the panel itself, needs a much more powerful backlight and a beefier GPU, needing a bigger battery, which is bigger and heavier. No doubt it'd be a huge plus to have in the mini, but what you'd have to give up in return really makes for a less appealing product.
The only realistic option would be to match the Nexus resolution, which then makes the iPad mini a very different product and dings application compatibility. There's really little sense in doing that for what amounts to a fairly negligible difference overall. 50ppi is noticeable but hardly tragic, especially since the iPad's display is better in every other way.
Stoked for mine to show up Friday. Got the cover today and love the size. No regrets at all even if it is updated in the spring.
Seems like a decent product. But simply just overpriced. Even more now that you can get a 32GB Nexus 7 for $249. I know some people prefer iOS, but damn paying $80 more and for half the storage. The only thing you gain is a rear camera.
To each his own I suppose.
Ok...
Wow some biased reviews. I guess some don't want to be band from Apple events or want Apple to mention them in the key note. Point blank its a nicer design but specs wise and no retina is a rip off.
I can't justify owning (any) iPad again, unless I get rid of my MBP. Having a laptop, an iPad, and an iPhone is just overkill in my opinion. They're all mobile devices, and one of them will inevitably be extraneous. The iPhone is super-portable, the MBP is super-powerful. The iPad is a compromise on both fronts, so it got sold.
That said, I'd buy an iPad if I ever ditched my MBP for an iMac. I could see it making a semi-suitable substitute in that case.
HAHA this is hilarious. The anti-Apple zealots in the discussions on all of these sites are FUMING that the iPad mini has received positive reviews from pretty much every review.
"A Retina Display and a lower price would have made the iPad Mini perfect."