You totally missed the point. The two weeks it needed was obviously not for technical reasons, it is for a way to come up a different version, since the court order never said that Apple cannot have any extra sentences along with the required sentence.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Removes UK Website Statement Regarding Galaxy Tab Design, Publishes Newspaper Acknowledgement
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
You totally missed the point. The two weeks it needed was obviously not for technical reasons, it is for a way to come up a different version, since the court order never said that Apple cannot have any extra sentences along with the required sentence.
Yes, the court said that they couldn't append nothing without submitting
Have you actually read the ruling?
----------
How can they sue the judges?
Why so many people think judges can not be regarded as normal persons!!!!!
In fact, as a person with higher public influences than normal, it makes perfect sense for him to be criticized at a much stricter level.
Last edited:
It's not about making the changes. It's about come up a different version and get the version approved by different departments of the company and the top executives.
Criticizing a decision is not the same than disobey a court order
----------
They don't have to approve nothing, the court has provided the text. Period
Judge, we have only one employee(Mr.Cook) willing and able to write apology letters. There is quite a bit of backlog because of all recent issues with our products. It will take two weeks.
We are training other employees who agree to learn on how to apologize, but they will be available only in first quarter of next year, as our training schedule is back logged.
We are training other employees who agree to learn on how to apologize, but they will be available only in first quarter of next year, as our training schedule is back logged.
Last edited:
Facts, quotes and links to rulings are ridiculous ? What do you not like about my Avatar exactly ? And notice what ? You're being vague. Are you trying to insult me without breaking the rules ?
Do you have anything other than ad hominems against me ? Like actual rebutals, fact based preferably, to arguments I've presented here ?
More of a play on how ridiculous all of this is. If you think about it though, the judges ruling is basically like kindergarten and apple has to sit in the corner so that everyone knows he was bad. Kind of a stupid penalty if you ask me. It solves nothing.
Troll
It took longer for the fanboys to respond than the trolls like you.
----------
Regardless of the article and its contents I am always amazed at the number of Apple haters who come here just to bash Apple and its "fanboys".
Do Apple "fanboys" go to Android sites and bash Android? I don't know, because I never visit those sites.
What is always funny is what a tiny, tiny small subset of smartphone users actually read articles at tech websites and post their nonsense comments. And how narrow-minded and clueless all of them are.
And then millions of customers go buy Apple products and are very happy.
It took longer for the fanboys to respond than the trolls like you.
----------
Regardless of the article and its contents I am always amazed at the number of Apple haters who come here just to bash Apple and its "fanboys".
Do Apple "fanboys" go to Android sites and bash Android? I don't know, because I never visit those sites.
What is always funny is what a tiny, tiny small subset of smartphone users actually read articles at tech websites and post their nonsense comments. And how narrow-minded and clueless all of them are.
And then millions of customers go buy Apple products and are very happy.
Are you being serious?
In what way, shape or form is this Apple being smart?
They posted what they were ordered, so they did - what did you expect, a big Apple logo taking up an entire page?
Not saying its not a problem, but it is a reality. I worked for a large bank, it would take 7 days to change a DNS. I can do that in 2 minutes.
I was pointing out that your avatar is easily recognizable. Therefore I happen to recognize posts that you make. When I see your avatar, It's another round of "oh great, there's this guy again..." I'm not attacking you. I happen to disagree with you most of the time is all. You are my poster child for the new members who seem to have come out of left field lately and bash Apple for everything.
New members ? Look at my register date, look at my number of posts...
If you disagree with me, then rebute me, don't insult me. That would be the mature way to hold a conversation.
Everything and anything that Apple does is "innovative", "new", "amazing", "just right", "smart".
Re-invent, revolutionary, resolutionary, this changes everything, this changes everything again....and again and again. re-re-reinvented...blah blah.
Apple is just bringing negative attention to themselves by not just getting it over with and posting a clean version of what they're supposed to do.
Instead they are going to drag this issue out bring more unneeded attention to it.
Just do it and be done with it. No need to drag it on....
Instead they are going to drag this issue out bring more unneeded attention to it.
Just do it and be done with it. No need to drag it on....
Surprising by Apple to miss a space between "and" and "Wales", and to change kerning to fit that url in on one line
Steve Jobs wouldn't have allowed that...
One of the more sensible comments that I've read here, about this case.
Judges are known to sometimes have big egos, and they don't take very well to having their authority undermined, and Judge BIRSS probably didn't appreciate very much the fact that APPLE continued to assert that the GALAXY TABS in question, were copies of the iPad. Also they can pretty well mete out any punishment they deem appropriate, (sometimes ridiculously so - read case law) so they punished APPLE a little extra for their intransigence, and perhaps to set a precedent, or an example to the tech world in general, by humiliating APPLE, to force them to post these ads. It seems that APPLE's legal team, thankfully so, has come to the conclusion that there's not much more to gain by pursuing this any further, and it's not likely imho, that any minds are going to be changed by further litigation in this case.
Life, sometimes doesn't seem fair; it's like that for EVERYONE. The court of public opinion will decide. Let's move on!
