Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple to Require 'Made for iPhone' Program Accessory Manufacturers to Meet Supplier Responsibility Code

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,489
30,728



As we noted several weeks ago, Apple scheduled a meeting with members of its Made for iPod/iPhone/iPad (MFi) program for November 7-8 in Shenzhen, China to brief them on the latest developments with the new Lightning connector standard. With Apple having moved rather slowly to bring accessory manufacturers up to speed, Lightning-equipped accessories have been slow to appear and it was not until this week that the first official Lightning products were even announced.

mfi_logo.jpg
TUAW now reports on a few details that have leaked out of the meeting, including the fact that the Lightning connector is waterproof and that all MFi accessory manufacturers must agree to abide by Apple's supplier responsibility code.
[D]uring the meeting this week a few interesting tidbits have made their way to us through the Great Firewall. Most are trivial (did not know: the Lightning connector is waterproof!) but one big one is not. According to our source at the event, Apple intends to make compliance with its supplier code of conduct a condition of MFi licensing. [...]

Pushing it out to the larger accessory ecosystem would be a concrete example of Apple using its 800-pound-gorilla status in the consumer electronics space to influence more companies to behave ethically on worker rights, environmental issues and more.
Click to expand...
The report notes that details on requirements for adherence to the code and potential penalties are not yet known, and speculates that U.S.-based accessory companies may have an advantage in compliance with stricter controls already in place.

Article Link: Apple to Require 'Made for iPhone' Program Accessory Manufacturers to Meet Supplier Responsibility Code
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2012/11/08/apple-to-require-made-for-iphone-program-accessory-manufacturers-to-meet-supplier-responsibility-code/
B

bocomo

macrumors 6502
Jun 29, 2007
495
0
New York
Apple only gets bashed by the media

Slim chance of this code of conduct bit making headlines

Or it will get spun as a "closed" system or Apple being control freaks
 
N

nickn

macrumors 6502
Jun 17, 2011
386
0
If they are going to charge massive amounts for lightning accessories, they might as well put in a requirement that products must be made in the US. OSHA would take care of the rest, employees would be getting a decent wage, and our economy wouldn't suck as much.
 
nagromme

nagromme

macrumors G5
May 2, 2002
12,546
1,196
nickn said:
If they are going to charge massive amounts for lightning accessories, they might as well put in a requirement that products must be made in the US. OSHA would take care of the rest, employees would be getting a decent wage, and our economy wouldn't suck as much.
Click to expand...

This is about third-party accessories, not Apple’s own.

(And not ALL accessories—just ones that one the Made for iPhone logo as a stamp of approval from Apple.)
 
B

bleaknik

macrumors newbie
Mar 6, 2009
17
6
nickn said:
If they are going to charge massive amounts for lightning accessories, they might as well put in a requirement that products must be made in the US. OSHA would take care of the rest, employees would be getting a decent wage, and our economy wouldn't suck as much.
Click to expand...

I have hoped that a company like Apple would bring manufacturing jobs back to the United States for a long time, but it gets complicated. First, even if Apple built stuff here, it wouldn't keep third parties in China from making them and flooding the market here. And we as a population, would probably buy them anyway because they'd inevitably be inexpensive (also, probably cheap).

Second, it's more than wages and available jobs that make it worth building something stateside (though, that's a big part of it). Supply chains of raw materials and component are lacking here--and it's not very cost efficient to ship two very closely related parts across the country to assembly a combined part and/or product.

That said... Apple has the capital. With the right opportunity, they no doubt could make it happen...
 
A

avanpelt

macrumors 68030
Jun 2, 2010
2,956
3,877
Apple just needs to get this third-party stuff ironed out as quickly as possible. It's nearly two months after the iPhone 5's release; and having no legit (not cheap Chinese knock-off) "Made for iPhone 5" accessories available from third parties is a joke.
 
Dwalls90

Dwalls90

macrumors 603
Feb 5, 2009
5,427
4,399
Okay.

My USB / 30 pin cable went through the wash and still worked :confused:

So who cares if Thunder is "waterproof". My phone isn't, so is this a big deal or am I missing something?
 
C

coolfactor

macrumors 604
Jul 29, 2002
7,043
9,706
Vancouver, BC
Radio said:
Here is what apple was thinking

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Click to expand...

By making it _harder_ for companies to make compliant products? I would say its more about raising the bar of quality and economic benefit. Sure, more costly at the consumer end, but more requirements filters out some of the junky products that fill store shelves. That can't be a bad thing.
 
W

Worldinmii

macrumors member
Aug 28, 2012
32
0
bocomo said:
Apple only gets bashed by the media

Slim chance of this code of conduct bit making headlines

Or it will get spun as a "closed" system or Apple being control freaks
Click to expand...

Sadly, I'm pretty sure you are right! This will get spun somehow by media and the haters as Apple forcing others to do what they want! :mad:
 
C

coolfactor

macrumors 604
Jul 29, 2002
7,043
9,706
Vancouver, BC
Dwalls90 said:
Okay.

My USB / 30 pin cable went through the wash and still worked :confused:

So who cares if Thunder is "waterproof". My phone isn't, so is this a big deal or am I missing something?
Click to expand...

Waterproof also means that moisture (and sweat?) won't collect inside the part and slowly degrade its performance over time. It also means that accidental electrical shorts are minimized.
 
J

jinnj

macrumors 6502a
Dec 9, 2011
551
499
apolloa said:
It would be nice if Apple was actually capable of ensuring it's OWN devices are capable of meeting a manufacturing responsibility code! Hypocritical much Apple???
Click to expand...

If you ever read anything but headlines you would know that the Apple pays more for their manufacturer's employees than the other companies.

----------
bleaknik said:
Second, it's more than wages and available jobs that make it worth building something stateside (though, that's a big part of it). Supply chains of raw materials and component are lacking here--and it's not very cost efficient to ship two very closely related parts across the country to assembly a combined part and/or product.
Click to expand...

It's more than that as well. If you've read the articles on the Tech Summit Obama had which included Jobs it's about technical level education and amount of employees needed. In China, you can have a workforce of 30,000 with a vocational school education in less that 2 weeks. That is impossible anywhere in the US. It is possible overall but not in one area.
 
hobo.hopkins

hobo.hopkins

macrumors 6502a
Jul 30, 2008
569
6
deannnnn said:
I will never understand why Apple is trying to solve China's problems when they could just move production to America and help solve our own problems here.

Oh right, they like money.
Click to expand...

That's right. How dare a business like money? They should just close and give all of their money to charity; that would certainly help the United States, right?
 
M

melendezest

Suspended
Jan 28, 2010
1,693
1,579
Mac Fly (film) said:
But… but… Apple is evil?
Click to expand...

Hahaha..Hmm, wouldn't be the only time I've danced with the Devil...:D

----------
nickn said:
If they are going to charge massive amounts for lightning accessories, they might as well put in a requirement that products must be made in the US. OSHA would take care of the rest, employees would be getting a decent wage, and our economy wouldn't suck as much.
Click to expand...

Sorry, I'd love to see that, but we need to let that notion go.

Not going to happen. Economics 101.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom