Compare it to anything remotely similar to Apple's where the design was copied from and you'll understand. That includes the software also.What inside of a chromebook is crap? Are you deliberately avoiding the question?
Compare it to anything remotely similar to Apple's where the design was copied from and you'll understand. That includes the software also.What inside of a chromebook is crap? Are you deliberately avoiding the question?
Compare it to anything remotely similar to Apple's where the design was copied from and you'll understand. That includes the software also.
Compare it to anything remotely similar to Apple's where the design was copied from and you'll understand. That includes the software also.
What???Samsung is the devil
if a judge doesn't appear to specify an order correctly, and Apple is thus allowed leeway to 'add' additional comments from that same legal statement, then I can't really see what all the fuss is about.
The Judge mentioned cool, etc, and Apple just included it.
It's a mad world, eh!
you have no idea what a chromebook is do you?
Yes, we are talking about the design and how the Chromebook has the outside design of a Macbook but it's merely a netbook. In every aspect, the Chromebook is inferior in quality, performance and engineering to any MacBook - that's what I call crap inside. And yes, I do consider software as something that's "inside".I'm asking you to explain why the insides of a chromebook is crap. You keep dodging the question or trying to get me to do some sort of research for you.
We're not talking about design. You said the inside of a chromebook is crap. Please quantify that statement. Software isn't what's "inside"
Yes, I do.you have no idea what a chromebook is do you?
But that's exactly my point. It's a blasphemy Samsung blatantly copying the outside design of a MacBook into a netbook piece of crap.Considering that the whole chromebook project is targeted primarily to education and widely received as cost effective solution to less fortunate students it seems a little disturbing to see them compared to the most expensive laptops on the planet. I think that is wildly missing the point. Just my opinion.
Yes, we are talking about the design and how the Chromebook has the outside design of a Macbook but it's merely a netbook. In every aspect, the Chromebook is inferior in quality, performance and engineering to any MacBook - that's what I call crap inside. And yes, I do consider software as something that's "inside".
Yes, I do.
----------
But that's exactly my point. It's a blasphemy Samsung blatantly copying the outside design of a MacBook into a netbook piece of crap.
Yes, we are talking about the design and how the Chromebook has the outside design of a Macbook but it's merely a netbook. In every aspect, the Chromebook is inferior in quality, performance and engineering to any MacBook - that's what I call crap inside. And yes, I do consider software as something that's "inside".
Yes, I do.
----------
But that's exactly my point. It's a blasphemy Samsung blatantly copying the outside design of a MacBook into a netbook piece of crap.
The MacBook design isn't exactly original.
But that's exactly my point. It's a blasphemy Samsung blatantly copying the outside design of a MacBook into a netbook piece of crap.
Why?
you've clearly never seen a chromebook either.
yes, it's SOOOO copying to have a silver painted plastic case for your laptop. nobody has ever had a silver painted plastic laptop before. HP in fact, didnt design their old Silver laptops either, They went forward in time, saw apple's success, and then stole it for themselves, so that they could launch their line of silver laptops years before!
Or is it that chicklet keyboard you're reffering to? you know, the one that IBM put in their keyboards years before? All these companies with time travel devices, using it for their own shenanigans!
you're not just off-base...
you're off in another planet
The first MacBook with that overall design came up in 2008. And it's not just about the metal case. It's about the whole thing. The flat keys, the layout of the keyboard, etc. The overall design feel that they are trying to copy.The MacBook design isn't exactly original.
Sony chiclet keyboard layout with an ultrabook shell.
Not too far off from a T13.
So Apple ripped of Sony and then Samsung ripped off.... Sony.
Hell, Sony's original Vaio had more aluminum in it than the original MacBook.
Well, that settles.If you're seriously asking this question, I sincerely doubt any explanation I could give you would make sense to you as proven by your earlier "dance."
The first MacBook with that overall design came up in 2008. And it's not just about the metal case. It's about the whole thing. The flat keys, the layout of the keyboard, etc. The overall design feel that they are trying to copy.
----------
Well, that settles.
That keyboard style and layout was designed by Sony.The first MacBook with that overall design came up in 2008. And it's not just about the metal case. It's about the whole thing. The flat keys, the layout of the keyboard, etc. The overall design feel that they are trying to copy.
MacRumors has been full of Android fanboys for since 2011. I think the MAJORITY are actually Android fanboys now.
Great. Cause the Chromebook is plastic with Silver paint! A design that laptop makers have been doing and using since the 90'sAnd it's not just about the metal case
Chiclet style keyboards were not Apple's invention. In fact, They have never accused anyone of stealing it, because they themselves 'stole' it. There were already examples of them in use prior to Apple.The flat keys,
Aside from the keyboard, there is no shared design philosophy. No more than any other laptop.The overall design feel that they are trying to copy.
I don't hate anything but I find it pretty shameless.Do you hate Asus as much. They copied the airbook design too, no?
Again, I'm talking about the overall design.That keyboard style and layout was designed by Sony.
if a judge doesn't appear to specify an order correctly, and Apple is thus allowed leeway to 'add' additional comments from that same legal statement, then I can't really see what all the fuss is about.
The Judge mentioned cool, etc, and Apple just included it.
It's a mad world, eh!
I thought they came from the acquisition of Compaq.
Image
I don't even remember when that came out. I just recall it being old.
Again, I'm talking about the overall design.