MB Air VMWare Fusion 5 Performance

Since you are running it on an Air you shouldn't be using more than 1 virtual cpu per vm. The Air uses a dual core cpu and VMware recommends to calculate the amount of virtual cpus as follows: amount of physical cores/2. Not following this rule of thumb can and in most cases will lead to performance issues.

Memory needs to be set carefully as well. The Air has a max of 8GB so you could set a vm to use 4GB but that means you'll have 4GB for OS X. From that 4GB 512MB will be used for the Intel HD 4000 thus you'll have only 3.5GB of memory. Raising the 512MB to 768MB will probably lead to that score of 6.4. Unfortunately you can't set how much VRAM is being used by the system, it is done automatically.

My scores are nearly the same as yours. I have the vm set to use only 1 cpu and 2GB of memory. My score for cpu is 5.3 and for mem it is 5.5. The other scores are identical to yours. I am also running Fusion 5.0.2 and that latest Air update.

I don't think you should worry about these specs much. On my custom windows desktop I had 8GB and still got a low score. I usually ignore that.

I run my Win8 vm with 1GB of memory and still get an overall score of 4.5.

VMs on the MBA just fly.

dt

dyn said:

Since you are running it on an Air you shouldn't be using more than 1 virtual cpu per vm. The Air uses a dual core cpu and VMware recommends to calculate the amount of virtual cpus as follows: amount of physical cores/2. Not following this rule of thumb can and in most cases will lead to performance issues.

Click to expand...

Actually your mileage will vary. I am forced to run a Windows XP environment in VM Fusion, and it is noticeably faster when I configure the VM with 2 vCPUs instead of 1. W8 on the other hand shows no noticeable performance increase with 2vCPUs. I think it all comes down to experimenting a bit.

wditters said:

Actually your mileage will vary. I am forced to run a Windows XP environment in VM Fusion, and it is noticeably faster when I configure the VM with 2 vCPUs instead of 1.

Click to expand...

Actually no. Nearly all (about 99%) of the performance problems come from setting too many vCPUs than the machine can handle. VMware is not encouraging the use of vCPUs and is actively doing so on their forums, the technical documentation on their website and the help centre in Fusion itself. The latter has the following text if you hit the question mark button in the vCPU settings window:

For Windows virtual machines running mostly office and Internet productivity applications, using multiple virtual processors is not beneficial, so the default single virtual processor is ideal. You can use multiple virtual processors in a virtual machine when the number of physical processor cores exceeds the desired number of virtual processors. For example, do not use two virtual processors unless you have a quad core physical processor.

Click to expand...

Or simply put: if there is no need to use multiple vCPUs, DON'T use them. You may need it when you want to test multicore/multicpu/multithreaded stuff but in most cases it is unnecessary. In some cases you may see a small performance increase...until your cpu is going to do a bit more. Then the machine (physical and virtual) will slow down tremendously and cause erratic behaviour.

Something similar goes for memory although it isn't as bad as the vCPU thing is. Just assign what you need (meet the minimum requirements for the guest OS) and not what you can possibly assign to the machine. The latter is just asking for trouble.

Btw, the above applies to ALL of the VMware virtualisation products, not just Fusion.