If I batch process converting 100+ RAW images from a 21 Mega pixel 5DMII and convert them to jpegs for client viewing, the SSD makes a huge difference. The Crucial 512 GB m4 performs at 500+ MB/second reads and 200+ MB/second writes, the stock Apple 750 GB drive is only 100+ plus there is almost no "seek" time with SSDs. I like SSDs but they aren't the silver bullets that people make them out to be.
That was my point, although sequential writes aren't that bad. For a lot of people the investment will be costly enough to consider prior to making a purchase. The misinformation on here annoys me at times. The questions can be too general. The answers are highly anecdotal. It's just that they work well enough when you aren't dealing with highly specific situations.
A note for people considering a SSD: Some drives with 400+ MB/second write times use compression. If you have filevault2 turned on or deal with a lot of video your actually write performance might be half of what you think that it is. Encrypted data is not compressible.
I figured you were dealing with photo/video when you said "batch processing". You have cpu cycles involved whenever there is compression, which is why I mentioned it. If it's not encrypted or compressed, you're basically dumping data to disk.
There is very little benefit to adding a extern SSD unless you are adding it via thunderbolt.
Even with a USB 3.0 interface, a fast SSD will bottleneck. An internal drive performs around 90 - 110 MB/second. You can get 100+ MB/second on an external USB 3.0 HDD. You just aren't going to sustain 500 MB/second via any other interface. If you can afford an external SSD via thunderbolt ($400 minimum) then you wouldn't even blink at 16 GB memory.
I'm assuming we're talking about notebooks here. With desktops 500MB/s was broken long ago. It's just that the options are expensive. On a notebook you could probably use mini-SAS through the express port, but that option won't work on a Mac. Getting an external drive with those speeds on a macbook pro is going to be somewhat expensive.
Last edited: