Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

What imac will you buy


  • Total voters
    162

njooste

macrumors newbie
Nov 25, 2012
8
0
27in, 3.2 Ghz, 8GB RAM, 680MX.

Still debating if Fusion is really necessary. Either 1TB standard or Fusion, probably standard.
 

squan

macrumors member
Nov 8, 2006
53
3
High end 27-inch
i7
1TB Fusion
680MX

Ram will be added afterwards, so logic and budget dictates.

1. It's the most "value" for money
2. Being a heavy video editor and casual gamer, this is the one that should me last at least 4 years.
 

forty2j

macrumors 68030
Jul 11, 2008
2,585
2
NJ
I've actually had a perfect storm of events come together such that I can't even order on the 30th :mad:

But when I do, it will be
27"
3.2GHz
680MX
1TB Fusion
$2566 incl NJ state tax
 

aidacra

macrumors newbie
Oct 23, 2012
22
0
The Netherlands
27"
3.4Ghz i7
8GB (already have Corsair 32GB waiting to enter my iMac)
680MX 2GB
3TB Fusion
Trackpad (next to Magic Mouse)
Battery Charger

Today I bought TimeCapsule 2TB.

Still need speakerset though. Thinking about the Soundsticks III.
 

XofDyer

macrumors member
May 24, 2012
31
1
3.4ghz i7 + 1TB fusion + 2GB GPU

(and I already have my 32GB ram and TB display)

Do I understand correctly - you are buying a 27' imac, but already have the TB display? Other than the usb ports, what is the advantage here?
 

mchoffa

macrumors 6502a
Jul 12, 2008
832
52
Asheville, NC
Do I understand correctly - you are buying a 27' imac, but already have the TB display? Other than the usb ports, what is the advantage here?

I'll be using the 27" iMac + TB display + 25" 1080P samsung display (which I already had). I keep a LOT of things open at once when I work, and with the power in this imac vs my 2008 model I'll be keeping even more open at once (since it will be able to handle it)

at the moment I've just got an expensive, pretty black mirror on my desk... hope I don't have to wait more than a few weeks
 

gmanist1000

macrumors 68030
Sep 22, 2009
2,834
825
I currently have the 2011 model, with the high end processor but I would love to have this new iMac, but it's probably just not worth the upgrade.
 

HBen

macrumors member
Nov 26, 2012
75
0
Looks like high end 27" could be the most popular, seems most people want the high on of each size.

I'll be getting high 27" with 680mx
 

Hakone

macrumors 6502a
Oct 5, 2011
509
4
Southern California
27" loaded model seems to have a better performance per dollar ratio. I may wait a couple of months to see what issues come up and be hopefully addressed by the time the frenzy settles down.
 

HBen

macrumors member
Nov 26, 2012
75
0
27" loaded model seems to have a better performance per dollar ratio. I may wait a couple of months to see what issues come up and be hopefully addressed by the time the frenzy settles down.

You that's exactly what I think. Plus I think it is most future proof I should get a good 4years+ from mine
 

Ademordna

macrumors regular
Nov 17, 2012
123
0
UK
Little mouse in corner says she is going for the least popular one, with 16gbram :eek:
But I made my choice, stubborn though it be!
 

TouchMint.com

macrumors 68000
May 25, 2012
1,625
318
Phoenix
I am guessing this is a bit skewed of what actual sales will look like. People on this forum are the hardcore where I feel like the average user will just grab a base 21" to have a cool looking mac.
 

MacDouble

macrumors member
Sep 24, 2012
67
0
I can't understand why all people want the fusion drive for this price.
I mean 250$ for a 128gb SSD?!
Okay, faster boot time and faster start of programs but i think that's not worth the money except for video/photo editors.
 

medi.freak

macrumors regular
May 26, 2011
221
0
Why do many take the 3,2 or even the 3,4 Ghz iMac? What do you guys do on it to justify the "better" 27"?

Or do you mainly get it because of gaming and the better GPU in the 3,2 one?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.