Also, I still don't have enough storage space to store my entire music collection, so until that happens, give me more storage.
I think in the future we will see higher storage capacities in smaller sizes, so why not keep increasing this?
In the same vain as the iPod touch line I imagine the colors would have a white bezel, the black being the only one with a black bezel. I did a few mockups, including a Product (RED) one. I wouldn't mind one actually.
In the same vain as the iPod touch line I imagine the colors would have a white bezel, the black being the only one with a black bezel. I did a few mockups, including a Product (RED) one. I wouldn't mind one actually.
Oh, so when Apple does this, it gets you excited. But when Samsung does it, you call it flooding the market to see what sticks. Got it.
I hope it doesn't come in other colors. Black and white is enough.
I don't see the point of offering a colored side/back and a white bezel, since most people will put it in a case that covers up all the color. Only way that makes sense is to color the bezel (which I really hope they do, because how awesome would an orange-bezeled phone in a red case look?)
Technology is improving at a rapid rate here, I would not dismiss any thing mentioned in the report as impossible.
This is only the case if you expect Apple to stick with the same cell chip and radio finals. Technology is rapidly improving here, they could easily have the hardware required to run on multiple service providers in one cell phone. It is really a matter of timing.
The other point is the continued use of color for the iPod line up. Apple would only do that because the offerings make customers happy. There is likely strong customer demand for other colors.
You make an assumption here about the case design. A new iPhone can have any case design Apple wants to provide.
Battery tech improves right along with silicon tech. The rate isn't as rapid of course but frankly it has been a long time since Apple has significantly increased battery capacity.
Here I agree 100%. In fact I would like to see Apple design at least one iPhone where the camera is a principle feature of the device. This does mean designing to accommodate the optics but this is likely possible without blowing up the iPhone in thickness seriously.
Many will likely reject this idea but let's face it, some users would appreciate a photography focused iPhone. While a sensor improvement is always welcomed what would really sell such an iPhone is a quality optical ZOOM.
Streaming costs a small fortune over cellular networks, I don't ever see it as cheaper than having enough flash for your libraries. Especially musical libraries where songs could be played multiple times.I agree, I currently have a 64GB iPhone 5 so that I can get my entire music library and movie collection in my pocket.
But I think this type of device owner will gravitate towards iPads, especially the iPad Mini to carry entire libraries of data. Plus the iPad platform is more geared for the sit down, and "browse massive amounts of data" user.
We should expect storage capacities to grow in iPads, but as LTE improvements roll out, streaming will be much easier, and the cheaper alternative.
Not me! Frankly I want an iPad with more storage at an affordable price point. 128 GB in the midrange model would be nice. As it is now anything above the base model is a complete ripoff as you are paying huge dollars for nothing more than a doubling of flash capacity at each step. This really sucks when 16GB of flash can be had for $10 or so.I'm willing to sacrifice storage capacity so that Apple can enlist greater wireless/cell tech, while keeping price the same.
Of course it isn't easy to do, that doesn't make it impossible though. Even if it isn't one design for the world significantly reducing the number of models required would be a big win.The colored iPod touch lineup only comes in 2 capacities though, and we'll see about the next iPhone chip but I doubt it will be a 100% world phone. I don't know technically why but it seems so hard to do.
I have no respect for Anandtech whatsoever. IPhone cases are CNC machined so alterations are fairly simple. Further there is a pretty significant amount of glass on the front of those iPhones so I don't see a NFC problem at all.As for the case design, it wouldn't be called "iPhone 5S" if it has a new case design. Either there's NFC, either it has a new case design, since both at the same time is impossible (according to Anandtech anyway).
I'm not too sure myself but it isn't a technical issue with respect to RF. for Apple I would imagine security is the bigger issue. To that end I willing to bet that if the iPhone gets NFC it will also get a finger print reader.The analyst claims both that it'll be a 5S and that it'll have NFC, which I don't think will happen.
It all depends upon the availability of new chemistries. People significantly underestimate just how much research has been going into lithium batteries. One sub category is batteries for tools which are seeing new generations of batteries being introduced right now.The iPhone 4 had a 1,420 mAh battery, and the iPhone 4S had a 1,432 mAh battery. That's a 0.8% improvement. We may see a slightly better capacity improvement in the 5S but I doubt it'll be more than 5% if it's in the same case, judging by the past.
Well that is most certainly true. However many of the things mentioned in the report aren't hard to do.Every time a new iPhone is expected, people have huge expectations and always end up disappointed. I'm just trying to be realistic.
Frankly I'd rather see it happen in the iPad first. IPad is a far more interesting place for a large secondary store.I don't think 128GB will happen either. Not that it's technically impossible, I just think it won't happen.
Apple can make a cheaper iPhone which they will call 'different', just like the iPad Mini is not just a cheaper iPad.This is the stupidest rumor in the world. "Let's just list every killer feature we want on the iPhone and pretend it's news!"
- Apple isn't going to change the screen size again for years.
- NFC? Really? It's pretty clear that Apple doesn't support the technology.
- Apple isn't going to dilute the iPhone brand buy offering it like an iPod with six colors.
- Apple already has a low cost iPhone. It's called the iPhone 4. Apple doesn't make "low cost" products.
- Apple isn't going to put a retina display on the mini anytime soon. That resolution would be insane on that screen size.
When I read over all that stuff again. It does sound like this "analyst" wants Apple to be Samsung.