If they actually had a competent Maps team with set priorities, a large number of POIs would be fixed everyday given the amount of feedback/corrections sent by iOS users everyday.
But that ain't the case. People have sent the same correction for incorrect POIS
10 times and it has yet to be corrected. What does this say about Apple and their team? Seriously, why put a "Report a problem" button when you aren't keen on fixing problems in your own application??
What would you consider a "large number of POIs" that could be fixed in a single day? And whatever that number is, it's quite possible that they do fix that many but that it pales in comparison to "the amount of feedback/corrections sent by iOS users everyday."
Also, assuming they get many reports daily, they likely have to figure out a way to prioritize those reports, meaning that the POIs that people have sent 10 times may be part of a total of, say, 50 that potentially places it far down that priorities list compared to other reports.
The bottom line is that we don't know. We don't know how many reports they fix, how many they get, and how they deal with them in general.
Also, what
CTHarrryH said:
What takes time isn't getting information from users but verifying that it is correct. I could have 10 of my friends report, incorrectly, that a rival's restaurant has closed, moved, etc. If Apple just accepted those 10 people's statements they would have made something wrong from something that was right.
And don't think people would not mis-report data - either on purpose or by accident.
If you are going to fix things - which they must - they must make sure that what they are correcting is not accurate.
Eat humble pie and pay Google the necessary dollars to get a top end implementation that has feature parity with Android...
Or do things your way, Apple, which certainly wouldn't strike me as out of the ordinary.
Considering the piles-o-cash that Apple has, I highly doubt their move away from Google's maps has anything to do with money. But that isn't necessarily what you were saying. It's more likely that it has to do with data, which you could argue
is money these days but that's not the point, and who gets the data and then how it's used.