Thanks, thekev. It's funny how much people on this forum are bringing up luminance masks lately. I too edit manually to a great extent, even when I begin with a LM. I recently wrote a stub for a future article about it, which you can read here: LINK.
I actually stumbled across the idea of masking by values on my own a number of years ago before finding out others did the same thing, but I do quite a bit of painting on stuff. It's just easier to shade things when you know they're masked off correctly. Going by eye is too difficult, as the levels of detail go finer than they would with an illustration. You've started off with really excellent lighting, which helps. I'm looking at this one on your site right now. I don't think those leaves would have masked easily via luminance masks. Do you ever end up having to paint mask smaller details like that or do you just choose time of day better than me?
Anyway, I thought previously that a Series 2 would solve the problem I had with my Series 1 Gitzo (same thing, broken alloy), and I'm not feeling at all inclined to carry around a heavier Series 3 Gitzo in the hopes that it will be beefy enough to avoid a similar fate.
Series 1 always seemed kind of limiting. On their site Gitzo tends to suggest against it with longer lenses, and I like the ability to stitch from those.
It's really depressing that I could buy two Gitzos for the price of one equivalent tripod from RRS. I'm in a real quandary with this issue. There was a time when I never thought I would pay what I did for the Gitzos, but I ultimately plunked down the money thinking I would never need to buy another tripod again. When does it stop?! OK, that was just a rant, but it felt good to get it out!
I get you. The gear adds up in cost. The only reason I've previously considered RRS is that the Gitzo legsets that I really like are over $700 anyway. If I had the same thing happen twice, I'd probably look for an alternative.