So I think we have established that the 680 is fast, after running a game that pushes the card hard for an hour or so, how is the fan speed/noise?
For Windows users, in addition to 3DMark 11, I suggest 3D Mark Vantage which is available from the FutureMark website or from Steam:
http://www.futuremark.com/support/downloads
We've used it in the past to compare different GPUs doing Texture Fill, Color Fill, Pixel Shader, Particles Collide, Perlin Noise, etc.
If this card is only to be used in Apple's iMacs, will NVIDIA even bother to make proper Windows drivers for it?
I have to admit, if the 680MX GPU is to be an Apple "exclusive" I would be concerned that NVIDIA may not invest so much time and effort developing Windows drivers - why would they? I have the AMD 6970M (2011 iMac) and every couple of months there are new Windows drivers optimised for the latest games and applications.
What kind of drivers are you using for the 680MX in Windows 7 so far?
So I think we have established that the 680 is fast, after running a game that pushes the card hard for an hour or so, how is the fan speed/noise?
Can someone post Crysis benchmarks please.
So I think we have established that the 680 is fast, after running a game that pushes the card hard for an hour or so, how is the fan speed/noise?
So...for those of us who are only occasional gamers, is there any reason besides gaming to go with the 680 over the 675? I'm about to put that 27" iMac in my cart, but am waffling on the graphics upgrade.
So...for those of us who are only occasional gamers, is there any reason besides gaming to go with the 680 over the 675? I'm about to put that 27" iMac in my cart, but am waffling on the graphics upgrade.
Reading what I am here, I'm highly tempted to play more games
I used the Guru3D Crysis Benchmark Tool to assist in running the built-in Crysis Timedemo benchmark_gpu. The demo was looped twice and the framerate averaged by the tool. All runs were set on Very High quality at panel native 2560x1440 and run with the 32-bit version from Steam.
Run #1- DX9 AA=2x~~Average FPS:45.73
Run #2- DX9 AA=4x~~Average FPS:41.48
Run #3- DX9 AA=8x~~Average FPS:39.47
Run #4- DX10 AA=2x~~Average FPS:33.14
Run #5- DX10 AA=4x~~Average FPS:31.08
Run #6- DX10 AA=8x~~Average FPS:30.09
For $150, I think it is a bargain -- based alone on the fact that the 680 doubles the 3DMark 11 score of the 670 and doubles the video memory. With many pro and entertainment apps using up all or more of 1G VRAM, think of it as "future proofing."
In my opinion, for "part time" gamers the 675 is fine...save the 150 and put it towards the extra RAM....again, just my opinion....
I wrote a post on Nvidia official forum about the concern with the next windows drivers being not optimized for the 680MX.
https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/525662/geforce-drivers/680mx-windows-drivers/
Hopefully we will get an official answer.
Thanks! Hopefully more mac users will bug Nvidia about this, until we finally get an answer/proper driver. I hope there's still more performance to be gained with 680MX than we're seeing now, if we get more mature, proper official Nvidia drivers. Quite frankly the performance of 680MX in Windows was a bit disappointing.
I already had an official response from them (previously in this thread).
They will be providing drivers for the 680MX. I was speaking to a representative.
Everybody is talking about Windows drivers... does anyone know if Apple keeps up to date on the drivers for OSX? I'm more of a casual gamer, so I am not going to install Windows just to game.
Everybody is talking about Windows drivers... does anyone know if Apple keeps up to date on the drivers for OSX? I'm more of a casual gamer, so I am not going to install Windows just to game.