Of all the posts, this reply has some legitimate links. Unlike the previous poster trying to trick his way into winning an argument providing a link that does not show any large screen size Samsung phones. It is kind of hard to imagine no one knows Galaxy S3 and Note2 sells more phones than any other brands in Samsung. Isn't it all over the news? S3 is 4.8 inch. Not 4.3 as previously stated. If of all phones Samsung sells this S3 phone the most, something must have lighted up in people's heads that people like large screen sizes (you don't need to squint ).
Ah, the Straw Man logical fallacy:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and to refute it, without ever having actually refuted the original position.
First you focused your attack on only one of my many sources, claiming it does not include any large screen phones (the S3 and Note 2 in particular), completely ignoring the sources I referenced that in fact
do include the S3 and Note 2.
Secondly, your claim is false, as the Samsung Galaxy S2 is included in that first source, and that has a 4.52" screen. Significantly larger than the 3.5" iPhone screen that was available during that time period,
which sold more than all of these phones put together, and significantly larger than the 3.2" Prevail.
Interestingly enough,
all of my sources include large screen phones, yet you claim I'm trying to trick everyone by excluding them, by pointing at the
single source I referenced, because it doesn't include two specific large screen phones that weren't even out yet. Classic Strawman.
I have provided a source showing a 3.2" phone outsold all of the larger phones of it's time. I then provided another source showing that in the 7 days ending with October 1st, 2012, that only 6.1% of all Android devices had a 4.3" or larger screen.
Now you make this claim:
"If of all phones Samsung sells this S3 phone the most"
What source do you have for this?
Looking at your original post, I have demonstrably shown that the iPhone 5 can do #1, with links. I have demonstrably shown that any phone with Bluetooth (even a dumbphone) can do #2 ("where is that door opening, room entering light and music on technology? GPS won't work here because you could trigger it a block away. Bluetooth 4.0 I don't think can handle it yet."), also providing links showing how people (including myself) are currently accomplishing this with Bluetooth.
Lastly, I have shown #3 is an opinion, which the market currently does not agree with. If you want it, that's fine, but I have shown multiple sources highlighting that you are in the minority here.
What sources have you shown that I am wrong on #1?
What sources have you shown that I am wrong on #2?
What sources have you shown that I am wrong on #3?