They definitely want both consistent resolutions and pixel densities.I guess they'd want consistent display resolutions, whether 'tis IGZO or not.
Display area of the iPad-mini = 29.6 square inches.
Current Resolution = 1024 x 768 = 786432 total number of pixels
Pixel Density = (Total Number of Pixels/Display Area)^0.5
Pixel Density = (1024*768/29.6)^0.5 = 162.99 ≈ 163 pixels per inch.
Doubling the Resolution (converting to Retina, while using IGZO panels, since it allows for higher density):
iPad-mini with Retina Display area = 29.6 square inches.
Resolution = 2048 x 1536 = 3145728 pixels
Pixel Density = (2048 x 1536/29.6)^0.5 = 325.99 ≈ 326 pixels per inch.
Same pixel density as iPhone. It'd seem likely to happen, but they'd want consistent resolutions, not pixel density.
For iPad and iPad mini, they would definitely want a consistent 2048 x 1536 resolution.
One could, however, argue that for Apple, pixel densities are more important. Think about it: the iPad mini currently has a pixel density of 163 pixels per inch. That's exactly the same pixel density the iPhone 3GS had. They discontinued the iPhone 3GS this year, and they used the display production lines for the iPad mini.
Next year, when they might settle for a Retina iPad mini, at 326 pixels per inch, they could easily use the iPhone 4/4S/5 production lines. Why is this important? Setting up a new production line costs a lot of money. If they make sure products with displays have the same pixel densities as other products, than they will save A LOT of money.
Apple cares about the resolution to make it easy for developers. The App Store is important and it draws in a lot of customers.
Apple cares about the pixel density, because using the same pixel density as another iDevice has, could save a lot of money.