Where to start with this BS! Samsung don't innovate? Who came up with 90% of the stuff in your iToy's? It sure as hell wasn't Apple. Who has 1000's of people working in R&D to make components smaller and more efficient, it sure as hell ain't Apple.
I'll disagree that it's not coming from Apple. Since the A4, Apple has done much of the design for the SoC. They've used a reference design, modded the hell out of it, and let Samsung fab it for them. The A6 was a complete custom design by Apple. They've pulled a ton of off the shelf parts (that are available to other vendors so call it a wash). The retina and high-resolution phone/tablet displays that we all enjoy have no doubt been sped along through Apple's funding. They've since been surpassed, but pre-iPhone, most smartphones had really crappy screens.
Not to mention that Apple built an entire operating system to run on the device, and built a surrounding ecosystem full of apps.
If Samsung, LG, Sharpe etc were not innovators then none of the improvements you have seen over the past 10 years in the Mac would have happened. Apple didn't develop and the new screens we see today.
The only thing since Firewire Apple have truly been at the fore front of has been Thunderflop. There is a lesson there. The two technologies Apple has serious input on have flopped.
I'm actually going to partially agree with you. There are innovations coming out all across the technology industry. Some are coming from Apple, some from Samsung, some from Intel, Qualcomm, etc. Many of these components have already been built and are simply off the shelf parts for Apple, Samsung, and whomever to pick and pull.
But there are 2 main areas that I have a real issue with the argument that "Samsung innovates and Apple doesn't".
First is that cramming every single feature into a phone doesn't necessarily equal innovation. For instance NFC, I think, is a solution in search of a problem. I'm not saying that it doesn't have it's uses, but it's not a necessity in a phone. Wireless charging is another feature. Fortunately, consumers have a choice. To this point, if NFC and wireless charging are deal-breakers, Apple is more than willing to lose you as a customer. Apple has decided to focus on a few features and build the heck out of their phones at the cost of limiting the number of models it sells. Samsung has decided to offer dozens of phones, each with a slightly different feature set (with different Operating Systems) and release a new "flagship" phone every few months.
And while I prefer Apple's offerings to Samsung's, I can't say that Samsung is wrong in their approach to a product matrix. The biggest issue I have with Samsung is their marketing, saying that people are stupid (sheep) to choose a competitor's product. And I take issue with die-hards in both camps, assuming the other is wrong.
The second issue I have with the whole innovation argument is that Apple is good at some things but not others. They can design some really nice stuff, but they don't have the capability to build everything they make. They don't make displays, they don't fab their own semiconductors, etc. But they have a s***-ton of money. And a lot of that money goes into parts supplies, including research and development.
Apple doesn't make the retina displays for the Macs, but I'd be willing to bet that Apple approached Sharp and LG and said something like, "Hey, Sharp. We've been doing some thinking, and we want these same size displays, but at double the pixel density." The execs at Sharp said, "Well, it's going to cost a lot of money for us to come up with the technology. We are going to need to do some R&D, we have to come up with a new process and build a new fab." Apple pulled out its checkbook and said, "Then let's get to work."