Next somebody will try to claim ownership of ordinary words, such as windows!
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1518439/
Please read before posting again
Next somebody will try to claim ownership of ordinary words, such as windows!
You don't have to be an expert to know that this issue has nothing to do with who coined the phrase APP
It's irrelevant despite many many MANY people trying to argue otherwise.
Reading comprehension is apparently over-rated.
----------
I guess you never owned/used Palm Pilots.
It's cool.
PS - this has nothing to do with who made APP popular. How many times does that have to be stated
I disagree the term 'appstore' is not generic at all.
It was almost never been used before apple decided to call it's programs for it's phones apps. There were many software stores online and many didn't shorten applications to apps at all! I mean come on just because it's simple doesn't mean there aren't other names, every other company has thought of something original to call their outlets with no issues.
I mean they could have called it appshop, softstore or any number of variations on a theme. Amazon are guilty of copying, now whether that is illegal is a whole different debate and that is presumably what the court wants answered. I think it's fine for amazon to call their store whatever they want but they have to admit they are copying to get customers in the door. Sadly for amazon their name is not synonymous with quality and I think apple feels they are misleading the public into believing they will get an apple like experience.
I also have to say apples app stores are still lacking after an initial revelation the usability hasn't improved and needs a massive rethink.
Or Apple. Which there is nothing wrong with as long as you don't sell panes of glasses or fruits that fall from a tree. Then we run into the same issue we have here : "Descriptive".
There is nothing wrong with trademarking dictionary words in certain fields. There are different rules when it comes to descriptive terms however.
So bringing things up like Trademarks for Amazon or Apple or Windows is completely irrelevant, like bringing up "Application" vs "Program" or thinking Apple popularised "Application" and "App" when they obviously didn't.
I disagree the term 'appstore' is not generic at all.
It was almost never been used before apple decided to call it's programs for it's phones apps. There were many software stores online and many didn't shorten applications to apps at all! I mean come on just because it's simple doesn't mean there aren't other names, every other company has thought of something original to call their outlets with no issues.
I mean they could have called it appshop, softstore or any number of variations on a theme. Amazon are guilty of copying, now whether that is illegal is a whole different debate and that is presumably what the court wants answered. I think it's fine for amazon to call their store whatever they want but they have to admit they are copying to get customers in the door. Sadly for amazon their name is not synonymous with quality and I think apple feels they are misleading the public into believing they will get an apple like experience.
I also have to say apples app stores are still lacking after an initial revelation the usability hasn't improved and needs a massive rethink.
First of all, this little myth you are repeating has been circulated for a while now and its just not true. There are various examples of BOTH companies using BOTH terms throughout the past 30 years.
Second, neither company invented these words. They have been around hundreds of years and are just now being used in terms of computers.
Third, you can't trademark an abbreviation.
Get real
I disagree the term 'appstore' is not generic at all.
It was almost never been used before apple decided to call it's programs for it's phones apps. There were many software stores online and many didn't shorten applications to apps at all! I mean come on just because it's simple doesn't mean there aren't other names, every other company has thought of something original to call their outlets with no issues.
I mean they could have called it appshop, softstore or any number of variations on a theme. Amazon are guilty of copying, now whether that is illegal is a whole different debate and that is presumably what the court wants answered. I think it's fine for amazon to call their store whatever they want but they have to admit they are copying to get customers in the door. Sadly for amazon their name is not synonymous with quality and I think apple feels they are misleading the public into believing they will get an apple like experience.
I also have to say apples app stores are still lacking after an initial revelation the usability hasn't improved and needs a massive rethink.
Amazon can pretty tell Apple F U and tell them to drop it. I expect if Apple keeps pushing the case the result will be for Apple to pay all of Amazon legal fees in this.
At this point Apple base solution is to drop the case and walk away.
Amazon can pretty tell Apple F U and tell them to drop it. I expect if Apple keeps pushing the case the result will be for Apple to pay all of Amazon legal fees in this.
At this point Apple base solution is to drop the case and walk away.
Apple invented the popularity for the term App, they should have a right to use it.
----------
Hummm.... sure... I remember the word "App" before 2008 being used here and there in the industry, but the term "AppStore" was unique to my knowledge when Apple came out with the AppStore. Sure, it's common now because everyone loved it and started using it, but does not mean Apple does not have a right to try and defend it.
No one is preventing Apple from using the term App. Nor App Store. And this issue isn't about the word App.
::headdesk::
Until the USPTO rules on the actual validity of the trademark in regards to both Microsoft and Amazon's opposition to it, Amazon still has to enter good faith negotiations (their position could be to ask for a stay on the infringement claims until the USPTO has ruled).
Hummm.... sure... I remember the word "App" before 2008 being used here and there in the industry, but the term "AppStore" was unique to my knowledge when Apple came out with the AppStore. Sure, it's common now because everyone loved it and started using it, but does not mean Apple does not have a right to try and defend it.
But trademarks and patents seem to be worthless anymore. No company seems to respect either unless their forced to by the courts.
Windows users have called their apps "programs" and its built into windows like program files..."
Mac OS X has used .app since it was launched and in a folder called applications...
Now Apple is popular... everyone wants a bit even though Apple has used app for like 13 years
Sorry, but yes, "App Store" is generic. You can't trademark it.
I don't think anyone gets confused, they know you go to the app store to get apps regardless of what device it is on.
I don't know where you buy gas, but I never see the words "Gas Station" on a gas station's sign. So it's not confusing...because it's not actually there.
Windows users have called their apps "programs" and its built into windows like program files..."
Mac OS X has used .app since it was launched and in a folder called applications...
Now Apple is popular... everyone wants a bit even though Apple has used app for like 13 years
You seem very knowledgeable and intelligent. Can you do me a favor ? I'm illeterate and have some homework that needs doing. Can you tell me how many times the word "Application" shows up on this picture vs how many times the word "Program" does ?
It would be very appreciated if you could, simply click the image to zoom in.
I think I'm bowing out of this thread now though. It's already a retread of the other friend with people continuing their reconstructed version of history.
That's hardware not in reference to the store. I see your point. But irrelevant to this, no?.
does not matter. Irrelevant.
It doesn't matter who popularized the word App. It's irrelevant. The only thing that matters is App Store. Not App. Not Store.
You don't have to be an expert to know that this issue has nothing to do with who coined the phrase APP
Ok - let's go with App Store (not App) as being trademarked by Apple.
Deja Vous. Multiple Facepalms.
No one is preventing Apple from using the term App. Nor App Store. And this issue isn't about the word App.
::headdesk::
See my last post. It basically disproves the complete crap you just posted:Windows users have called their apps "programs" and its built into windows like program files..."
Mac OS X has used .app since it was launched and in a folder called applications...
Now Apple is popular... everyone wants a bit even though Apple has used app for like 13 years
With regards to those claiming Apple coined the term 'App'.
The term 'App' has been used for years.
Now I've got your attention. This below is a screenshot from RISC OS 3.1.1. It was released in 1991. I used it at school on an Acorn computer. Notice what that folder is called? And that icon on the bottom bar?
Image
It should also be noted that RISC OS used the term App in v2.0 which was released in 1989 (and possibly earlier versions of 'Arther') however I couldn't grab a screenshot.
With regards to those claiming Apple coined the term 'App'.
The term 'App' has been used for years.
Yeah, probably a good idea.
... or not
( I feel your frustration ... )
Sucker for punishment
And yet people still think this is about who coined/made popular the word APP.