This whole transitive property of who is better than who really has to stop in college football (sports in general too I guess....but college football is really all I care about so I'm going to limit this to that). Just because A beat B and B beat C does not automatically mean A is better than C.
Anybody that was paying attention this year knew going into Monday night that Notre Dame was as mediocre as ever. They have, for the most part, mediocre players that get turned into giants by a MSM that loves the Notre Dame mystique. In the end Notre Dame played a great team that was playing with great focus and got exposed for they truly are......a middle of the pack team.
They'll fit right in over in the ACC.
I agree with that, they were an overachieving team that underachieved in mondays game.
But the main issue is that you only have 12-13 games and you don't play everybody so how do you measure up teams? thankfully with the 4 team playoff there's a better chance of getting it right.
Then again, with 5 weeks off who can beat a Nick Saban team with above average players?