And Amazon is a rain forest. Android is a robot with a human appearance. What's your point? You obviously don't understand trademarks.
Uh ? What is it you claim I don't understand about trademarks exactly ?
The post I was responding to was quite irrelevant to the actual trademark discussion taking place, as the trademark filed by Apple is not over Application or App and trademarks aren't a popularity contest anyhow. How you can derive anything about my knowledge of trademarks from me saying "Apple wasn't the first to use Application" is quite funny in and of itself.
----------
Okay. Then explain it to him. Why is Apple valid? What about Pages? Or hey, Windows? Let's throw in Office for good measure?
Why are these allowed, yet App Store isn't?
kdarling pointed out the decision by the USPTO, it's what we've been saying all along, App Store is descriptive, just like Shoe Store would be :
"The mark would be immediately understood as ... transmission of software from applications stores and/or repair/updating of software applications obtained from an applications store.
"The applicant’s own website demonstrates the descriptive significance of the term APP STORE in relation to the identified services.
"Accordingly, the refusal to register the mark under Section 2(e)(1) as merely descriptive of the services is maintained and made final.
So if I don't understand trademarks, neither does the USPTO...