Well, those people who bought from Samsung did pay a whopping $25 more on their Samsung, Toshiba, Sony, LG, and other television. I guess different values are worth more to some people than others. You may think losing $25 on your TV is a bigger deal than slavery, but other people think the other way.
It's honestly a tremendous stretch to call this slavery. Also, it's not illegal, it's not a moral thing to do in my opinion, but legally, it's a sort of grey zone and just really quite douchey. It's pretty telling that the only thing the DOJ ended up doing to these companies is telling them not to have any more "no solicitation" agreements for five years. That's it.
Also, yes, the $25 is a bigger deal because it was $25 x millions and millions of customers. This is a recruitment ban on likely to be a few hundred of employees at most. Just because you're on a no-call list, it doesn't mean you were going to be solicited for sure. And it's obviously only meant to protect high level management and engineers/designers. If you're making 250k/yr, I'm not too sympathetic that you won't get your 25k bonus. Even if there were thousands of employees who were harmed, it's just not comparable.
And youre right, different values are worth more to some people than others. I think tax evasion, even if forgiven by the Korean president, is a far more serious issue and more importantly, an actual crime, that defrauded millions (billions?) from the Korean people.
Again, the magnitude is just not comparable, especially when what Apple (and as note earlier, we are focusing on Apple, but they're not the only culprit) did is not even remotely as damaging or harmful. Is it scum behavior? Yes, this I've agreed from the beginning. But I can't imagine how anyone intelligent can argue that Apple's behavior is worse than Samsung's while what Samsung did is "no harm, no foul."