Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which one is better?

D

dilgit

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 24, 2010
245
0
Which configuration of the late 27" iMac, out of the following two options, will better suit heavy gaming and video editing:

1.) 3.4GHz Quad Core i7 - 8GB Ram - GTX 675MX 1GB - 3TB Fusion drive
2.) 3.2GHz Quad Core i5 - 32GB Ram - GTX 680MX 2GB - 3TB Fusion drive
 
oililymad

oililymad

macrumors 6502
Jun 5, 2009
408
0
UK
dilgit said:
Which configuration of the late 27" iMac, out of the following two options, will better suit heavy gaming and video editing:

1.) 3.4GHz Quad Core i7 - 8GB Ram - GTX 675MX 1GB - 3TB Fusion drive
2.) 3.2GHz Quad Core i5 - 32GB Ram - GTX 680MX 2GB - 3TB Fusion drive
Click to expand...

I'd go for the second. I dont think many people need an i7 really. :)

and don't buy your RAM from Apple. That will save you buckets! Try Crucial

and why are you asking if you already have the 27" in your siggy? :p
 
maflynn

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,447
43,358
To me 8 seems too low and 32 seems over kill - not sure. If I have to choose it'd be #2 and I echo oililymad's comment in that you can save some money by upgrading the ram yourself though I understand the appeal of having apple do it and being part of the overall warranty
 
B

BigMac25

macrumors newbie
Apr 25, 2009
28
0
dilgit said:
Which configuration of the late 27" iMac, out of the following two options, will better suit heavy gaming and video editing:

1.) 3.4GHz Quad Core i7 - 8GB Ram - GTX 675MX 1GB - 3TB Fusion drive
2.) 3.2GHz Quad Core i5 - 32GB Ram - GTX 680MX 2GB - 3TB Fusion drive
Click to expand...

I would order what is highlighted in bold and upgrade the ram from 8gb to 32gb yourself. Apple charges way to much for ram.
 
D

dilgit

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 24, 2010
245
0
oililymad said:
I'd go for the second. I dont think many people need an i7 really. :)

and don't buy your RAM from Apple. That will save you buckets! Try Crucial

and why are you asking if you already have the 27" in your siggy? :p
Click to expand...

True... I already own the top of the line configuration which is blazing fast. I ask for a friend, not for myself, because I have no way to compare the two options. What my friend was actually asking was, whether the 3.2 i5 option will be so much slower than the 3.4 i7 option?
 
Last edited:
S

Serban

Suspended
Jan 8, 2013
5,159
928
There is only one option:

3.2GHz Quad Core i5 - 32GB Ram - GTX 680MX 2GB - 3TB Fusion drive

Check the difference between i5 3.2Ghz and the i7...
 
B

BigMac25

macrumors newbie
Apr 25, 2009
28
0
Gavzooka said:
Both stated uses would make use of hyperthreading in a lot of cases....whether they need them or not is a personal choice.
Click to expand...

and the i7 has 8mb cache whereas the i5 has 6mb.

I would want the imac to last as long as possible especially spending that kind of money. 200 dollars is not much when you are already spending 2500.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom