I think on the whole Google and Apple aren't too bad... However personally I would have Facebook permanently placed at the bottom of this list forever, seeing as its the most untrustworthy company with YOUR data on the planet!!
This is only about 'public perception' though. Hardly surprising that any big Tech Co could even be on that list.
"The nature of the beast" that is a 'connected' world.
.
Not anymore. Didn't you get the memo over at XDA? We quit doing the whole bring down Apple thing last week sometime.
Strange, how did Mozilla get to be #20? I mean... what average consumer would know and name 'Mozilla' as one of their top choices?
.
A lot of people have different priorities than you.
Personally, I don't need targeted advertising to tell me what I want. I'm perfectly capable of deciding that for myself. When I want something I can search for it, and don't need it appearing on every website and email I see. Knowing that most or all of my information (even anonymous information) is kept private (or as close as possible) is well worth the small inconvenience of searching directly for what I already know I want.
Clearly they thought the sheet said Godzilla. And who doesn't trust Godzilla?
haha..
I read further down in the methodology... they took all the initial responses, placed the companies with over 20 responses on a list, then asked respondents to rank the companies on the list.
.
<<snip>>
And yet another thread will devolve into Apple vs Google.
[blah blah blah]
Why people want to get bent out of shape because of this report is astounding.
You've never been to Austin, have you? It's a liberal town that caters to big business. As a result, Austin is consistently the fastest growing city in the country with the best job market. Lots of California license plates from people moving out of your sorry state here.
I defend corporations as they have the right to make money at all costs and i trust them to do that and only that. That's why they exist. Unless the government forces a company to keep information private, I believe any corporation will sell information for money.
Also, don't give me that stereotype Texas-y garbage, I'm an Italian American from Chicago.
And news flash. Apple collect the same information every time you download an app, song, etc and run them. Can we therefor declare that Apple sell that information on?
Just you. You have failed in your attempts to incite a rebellion.
Yeah thats what I dont quite get. People have this delusion that Google is bad because they did exactly the same thing as Apple, Microsoft, Viglink, Skimlinks and every other advertising network, but were more successful.iAds works the same way. It seems like people want to slam Google for what? Being more successful than Apple at being able to collect data?
Apple (with iAds) wishes it could be as much of a revenue stream. If anyone here thinks that iAds was launched with any other intention - please, do elaborate on your premise...
Yeah thats what I dont quite get. People have this delusion that Google is bad because they did exactly the same thing as Apple, Microsoft, Viglink, Skimlinks and every other advertising network, but were more successful.
It's shocking how hypocritical and well....plain dumb some people are really isn't it!
That's pretty much every Libertarian, Republican, and hard-right dingbat that I know.
I got the memo AND the box of hot pockets
Some of you pretend Google isn't trustworthy but you put your trust in them all the time. What kind of crazy things have you searched on Google search? Do you fear the police falling out of the sky coming after you? You probably use gmail. Do you fear somebody else beside Google now knows you intimately? And to be frank, the way information is collected. Even Google, meaning anybody working for them or affiliated with them, doesn't have access to them. Its all internal and encrypted. So relax, and have the sensible fear of your information being hacked because the company is not that secure, or is careless.