Slow shutdown solution
8:37 up 42 days, 21:08, 2 users, load averages: 1.35 1.37 1.30
I decided that some 3,5 months ago
Slow shutdown solution
8:37 up 42 days, 21:08, 2 users, load averages: 1.35 1.37 1.30
No one gives a carot how you or anyone else rationalizes this. The simple truth is that on it's on the fact that it takes 30+ seconds to shut down the most advanced desktop OS as they makrket (even on a god damn clean install on a ****ing i7 maxed out iMac) it simply INEXCUSABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE.
All rationalizations at this point are useless.
No one gives a carot how you or anyone else rationalizes this. The simple truth is that on it's on the fact that it takes 30+ seconds to shut down the most advanced desktop OS as they makrket (even on a god damn clean install on a ****ing i7 maxed out iMac) it simply INEXCUSABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE.
All rationalizations at this point are useless.
Well, your carrot does not bother me but you need anger management.
My windows 7 desktop takes almost 3 minutes to shut down. My Mac Book Pro late 2008 10.8.2 takes about 20 seconds, 30 seconds at most. My linux desktop just short of 1 minute. How fast should an OS shut down? And why? And if it is inexcusable and unacceptable, what are you going to do about it? Write in all-caps? Switch OSs? Find something to do for 30 seconds? Lots of ways to approach the issue.
You need to stop making excuses where there are none.
----------
I'm not interested in how long it can take to shut down system due to usage and other factors, but when it's some kind of bug which artificially extends shut down time to almost minutes in some cases and is being actively ignored while at the same time a NINTH beta is issued
As i said i'm not interested in how long it takes to shut down Windows or linux (my Windows 7 in Vmware shuts down faster than my Mac).
Have you provided this feedback to Apple?
You need to stop making excuses where there are none.
----------
I'm not interested in how long it can take to shut down system due to usage and other factors, but when it's some kind of bug which artificially extends shut down time to almost minutes in some cases and is being actively ignored while at the same time a NINTH beta is issued
As i said i'm not interested in how long it takes to shut down Windows or linux (my Windows 7 in Vmware shuts down faster than my Mac).
Several times. Add on top the bloody hilarious file:/// bug. Try typing file:/// just with capital F in any of OS X text entry fields. See what happens. This is low priority too i guess.
I tried this on Spotlight. Did my taskbar icons just crash and reload?
Send someone imessage from an iOS device to a Mac see what happnes.
It crashes the Messages app.
and any attemp to open the app will result in crash. Unless that person knows where messages keeps the histroy database.
No one knows. But i think this week.Does anyone know when OS X 10.8.3 is expected to be released to the public?
Does anyone know when OS X 10.8.3 is expected to be released to the public?
I was going to ask the same thing. Who in their right mind would stay on Lion? You either come to ML or go back to SL.
I'm staying with Lion 10.7.4 because everything works well for me, with no discernible bugs. Not saying it is perfect for everyone, but for me it works. As for 10.7.5, I've read about bugs where Time Machine take forever to do a backup. As for 10.8, whilst it might be more polished, those people would not claim it is fine-tuned.
The thing is, I use the Mac for work and for me 10.7.4 just works, and I don't care about the fancier features in ML. I'll wait till you kind souls have wrought your life with the angst that comes with beta-testing Apple's early releases of OSX, and I'll get on board when it's much more stable. By that stage, all you poor people are getting ready for the next roller coaster ride to beta test 10.9.
Usually I sit it out till 10.x.6 when the OS is smooth as butter, but this time with Lion I had to jump on sooner than usual since I bought a new Mac, and saw benefit in synched Calendar and Address Books with iCloud. But by the time of 10.7.4, things were quite good already. I missed the circus with 10.7 to 10.7.3, glad to say, thanks to all you kind paid-up beta-testers. Where would Apple be without generous people who volunteer to pay a token fee of $30-40 to beta-test their software.
So I get by with Lion's 2 second shutdown, while you folk help Apple figure out why Mountain Lion take several 10's of seconds often to shut down.
I lament (not) about missing features like Facebook integration, and thicker scroll bars.
Everyone goes on about how ML is so smooth, but on my Mac, with a clean install of 10.7.4 and extra memory, things here are smooth enough already, sufficient for me to forget about the Mac and get on with my work (except for times when I get distracted by MacRumors forums), so I can afford to wait till you guys help Apple iron out the bugs.
I have some Macs on SL, but prefer Lion because of synching of Address Book and Calendar with iCloud.
Wednesday, February 6 at 2:00 PM PST
Nope... Didn't come yet...
Looks like probably at least another week... ugh! At least Apple is trying to make all necessary changes before release.
http://9to5mac.com/2013/02/06/apple-seeds-os-x-10-8-3-build-12d65-to-developers/
I'm genuinely surprised at this comment--you're the only person I've heard make that claim.
So far as I could tell, even 10.8.0 was more polished than any version of 10.7 for most purposes, and I've heard almost no one claim otherwise.
Heck, for practical purposes 10.8.0 IS 10.7.6.
So, I am the only person who you've heard claim that 10.7.5 is more stable than 10.8.0?
How is it possible that a Mac OS version with zero bug fixes is more stable than the previous one with five bug fixes?
Milo more or less already replied with what I would have said, but yes, and I'm not an apologist. 10.7, while I liked it, was somewhat flakey; it was unquestionably less stable than 10.6, even by 10.7.5.That sounds like an Apple apologist comment. So, I am the only person who you've heard claim that 10.7.5 is more stable than 10.8.0? Are you serious? How is it possible that a Mac OS version with zero bug fixes is more stable than the previous one with five bug fixes?