30GB of space at 899. thats what in a real currency about £600. correct me if im wrong but you can get a 32 gb ipad for 480 + a keyboard case say £70 to be generous.
still £150 and your not having to use windows.
downside, you dont have a full OS. but its yet to be seen if a full operating system is useful under a touch environment. which is why a mobile OS is used.
i just dont see a space for full power computing in that mobile and a touch space.
ffs you people need to stop throwing MBA into this debate. MBA is a laptop/notebook/whatever, Surface is a TABLET. It's a tablet that can also support full Windows 8 and just because it can, it doesnt mean you can now throw it into the category of laptops. Yes, it has the "rubber keyboard", but that is only an option and because of that it doesnt make it a laptop. So doesnt the 1000$ price.
Tablets won't replace laptops until they're truly better than a laptop, and I think the surface pro hits the nail on the head in that regard. Wether you like it or not, the surface is the future.
i want one. been waiting for a tablet to run "normal" windows so you can still do some serious work on it if you have to.
This device is still "flexible" enough to act as a "normal" tablet since you can always use the "metro" version which is great for "on the go" check for email/facebook/weather/etc so the comment from Engadget
-**"If you're the type who likes to quickly pop on your tablet to check for new email or Facebook messages every few minutes, you may find yourself forced out of that habit here."
really doesn't tell the truth.
no but the exact same internal components as a MBA do.
It has more in common with an ultrabook than an iPad whether you like it or not.
So it's worse than a tablet, worse than a laptop and more expensive than both with less than half the battery life and no keyboard. Apple has nothing to worry about. Zune.
Although the 64gb iPad still has more actual storage than the 128gb surface
If it something serious like graphic design or programming then I want a bigger screen.
Now the use of a stylus is pretty obsolete.
Multitouch. Having the option to use a stylus IN ADDITION to your fingers is great. So many people buy a stylus because while interacting with the OS is better with your finger, drawing or note taking something more complex than words (math problems, diagrams) is better with a stylus.
...
At least unlike iPad with Surface you can actually plug an external monitor.
Tell that to users of Galaxy Note...
To be honest I tried a surface RT and was impressed.
I think Microsoft is heading in the right direction.
The key board cover with mouse pad is a killer feature that I wish the iPad had.
The office that it ships with is far better than anything on the iPad.
The pro on the other hand needs more storage space 256 gig and better battery life.
This is version one. I think this product will take off at version 2.
I think Apple released the 128 gig iPad as a reaction to the surface. I think they understand that they are falling behind.
I think they need to get office on the iPad and need to make the MacBook Air and pro into convertible touch screen devices.
- "As a laptop it is excellent. I was able to do nearly everything I needed to do including the editing of large documents, photo management, blogging, some minor gaming, and plenty of email and web browsing."
Why do you need excel on an iPad? There are several options for opening, editing and creating XLSX files on an iPad right now.
Honestly Microsoft have been a good maker in keyboard and mouse industries with their ergonomics designs, so I can't understand why M$ would give Surface such an awful keypad instead of a real keyboard with bouncing keys and good ergonomic design
There are some not too bad alternatives for the iPad, agree. But nothing beats "native" Excel. I would not "survive" in business without a flexible Pivot Table or some occasional VB enhancements. As much as I love iPad and its sisters and brothers I also appretiate the power of Excel.
This looks amazing. As for the battery, even if it is able to give an hour's worth of juice, its good. Nowadays, you have charging points everywhere. Cars, buses, trains, aeroplanes, cafes, etc. The only downside to it is that windows is a virus magnet. You're doomed if you take this as your only laptop/tablet.
This looks amazing. As for the battery, even if it is able to give an hour's worth of juice, its good. Nowadays, you have charging points everywhere. Cars, buses, trains, aeroplanes, cafes, etc. The only downside to it is that windows is a virus magnet. You're doomed if you take this as your only laptop/tablet.
At some point in the next 2 years, we are going to get the power of a Core 2 Duo in the thinness of an iPad, and Microsoft's path will probably make sense. Until then, we are going to see the same fumbling that Apple had with the first MacBook Air which was terribly expensive ($1799+), ran too hot, had too little storage, was slow, and only one USB port. And sales didnt take off for a while. And boom, October 2010 revision rolls around with all flash storage at $999 entry price point and a legend is born. Everyone knew that the future of computing would come from the DNA in the MacBook Air, it just wasnt worth owning in 2008.
So just remember that even if the first version sucks (and for any product, it's almost bound to), the revisions are what you really need to watch out for.
People do real work all day on iPads. They use Citrix to run windows apps.
The only downside to it is that windows is a virus magnet.
Falling behind where, and to whom? The last I've seen the iPad still had the lions share in the tablet area. Microsoft is playing catchup here, not Apple. Second, I get the feeling that Office on the iPad is up to redmond, and not Apple. There have been leaked pictures showing Office running on an iPad for over a year now.