What a pompous jerk!
"Nope."
Seriously?
Someone has to check in their unjustified ego at the door.
Radio
What a pompous jerk!
"Nope."
Seriously?
Someone has to check in their unjustified ego at the door.
Radio
yep. double when he's negating an analyst wild guesses.
----------
No and he won't. He has too much respect for the company to make those kind of claims.
The palm of one's hand doesn't qualify as a womanI'll buy more computers and phones and women than I'll ever buy tvs.
This!I talk bollocks most of the time, where do I apply for an analyst's job?
He's in a business run by self-indulged schmucks. These are the people that get paid for making nothing out of nothing and then calling it something.Yep. Leads one to wonder how he makes his money...
That's exactly it. When people get the invites then we know there will be an event. Otherwise their either is no event or is no event in the near future.Apple won't clarify anything. Apple will either send out invitations, or they won't send out invitations.
pffft. I was very excited about this. oh well, Apple probably got their hands full with forstall departure.
Apple won't clarify anything. Apple will either send out invitations, or they won't send out invitations.
Ok tell me thenHuh?
I think comments like this say a lot more about the comment-er than the target of the comments.
What's so pompous about that?? Jim is a fairly straightforward guy who doesn't meddle in bulls*it, unlike most of the analysts. If he replies to a claim with "Yep" or "Nope", chances are he knows it for a fact.
LMAO If you knew Dalrymple like I do, you'd know what that was the funniest thing I've read all week.It's pretty clear that Dalyrmple's source is the very highest level of Apple.
Ok tell me then
----------
That's rude to reply with one word.
Okay let's see how you'd deal if your coworker just said yup or nope all day.
Lol you'd hate it!
LMAO If you knew Dalrymple like I do, you'd know what that was the funniest thing I've read all week.
Jim has sources. You're wrong about where they sit.
Ok tell me thenQUOTE]
No, I don't want to get banned so I can't tell you what I really think.
But let me explain: A one word sentence conveys very little information. In this case a single bit of information. Out of that you see a rude, pompus, egotistical jerk. That's a lot more than the one bit of information that came from Dalyrmple. So where did that extra information come from? Clearly from you. It reflects your perspective opintions and way of thinkning about the world. E.g., I think to myself: what kind of person starts hurling insults at a stranger with no provocation? When a person sees something neutral as pompus and egotisical won't the reverse (yet similarily charged) terms show how they see themselves in relation to the world in general?
LOL Good reporters don't reveal their sources.Well, dish then: where do they sit?
These two examples are in no way analogous. Dalrymple and Misek are neither coworkers, nor interact directly on a day-to-day basis.
Misek is known to talk out of his ass a lot. In the past year and a half, he's predicted the launch of an "Apple Television" as many as six times. Jim is well within his right to put him in his place. If Misek wants more respect, he should seriously up his accuracy record, especially on the topic where he had 5 misses in a row.
And, believe me, if one of your coworkers was spewing bulls**t all day, you'd resort to minimal form of communication as well
LOL Good reporters don't reveal their sources.
LOL We both know you have no real interest in any of that information. You're just trying to score cheap points. I've been doing this a long time and troll questions like yours are really easy to spot.Oh, so you're a reporter? Very interesting. Well, good reporters also build credibility though a history of accurate and ehtical reporting. Can you point me to some of your published articles?
LOL We both know you have no real interest in any of that information. You're just trying to score cheap points. I've been doing this a long time and troll questions like yours are really easy to spot.
You're going to have to work quite a bit harder to draw me in.
BTW, "good reporters" know how to spell "ehtical".