No, it is physically impossible to have a return rate of over 100%.
Perhaps some people returned laptops they never purchased?
No, it is physically impossible to have a return rate of over 100%.
Perhaps some people returned laptops they never purchased?
Perhaps some people returned laptops they never purchased?
I was being dramatic!! I guess I should have said 'over 9,000%' lol
But yeah return rates were pretty bad
Yeah... that was a joke... Have you ever seem Dragon Ball Z?
No, it isn't. Intel Cores and Xeons are up to date and have a large user base. PowerPCs are outdated, power consuming, and have a small user base.
No a POWER series cpu is not outdated there was one released last year. The power 8 will come out this or next year?
And what machine are you going to be using that utilises this POWER 8 architecture?
No a POWER series cpu is not outdated there was one released last year. The power 8 will come out this or next year?
Well, to play devil's advocate, IBM did unify the POWER and PowerPC ISAs not long after Apple went to x86, and the resulting merged Power ISA is much more PowerPC than POWER. IIRC it was POWER6 that went forward with the new unified architecture, and it had a lot more in common with our older desktop Macs than with POWER5 under the hood.As I just told you, POWER and PowerPC are not the same thing!
As I just told you, POWER and PowerPC are not the same thing!
No, it is physically impossible to have a return rate of over 100%.
But they are similar! Intel xeon and intel core i7 are not he same but they are still x86 just like powerpc is isa 2.06
Naysayers.. can't live with them! Please if you can't accept that there are many of us still around then please don't post here. We have enough anti-PowerPC going around to handle.
If you want to debate about Intel versus PowerPC and even ARM, this is not the place.
Personally I would love to try a Linux distribution that would be more PowerMac friendly. Ive tried alot of them and every now and then use my Lubuntu partition, but have been frustrated with the bugs and hiccups that they all seem to have.
Personally I would love to try a Linux distribution that would be more PowerMac friendly. Ive tried alot of them and every now and then use my Lubuntu partition, but have been frustrated with the bugs and hiccups that they all seem to have.
A quick trip to distrowatch will bring up:
MintPPC
CRUXPPC
Fedora PPC
Ubuntu PPC
Lubuntu PPC
Gentoo PPC
OpenSUSE PPC
Finnix if you super luv command line.
None are super easy to install, configure, and most (Ubuntu) are dog slow on older PowerPC macs. None are very mac like (though Lubuntu can be quite nice). Most have major issues with things like powermanagment, media playback, and portables (ibook, Powerbook) are a total pain the ass. This is why, if Crunchbang can be successfully ported and maintained that would be.....AWESOME news.
And, there is no PPC equivalent to Puppy Linux, or ConnochaetOS, ie, versions that are specifically DESIGNED for older hardware. Zen (there would have been much swinging of the maple leafed sword and blood shed on this post) is beginning work on porting Puppy to PPC, but it may be awhile with his new job.