Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

BaldiMac

macrumors G3
Jan 24, 2008
8,760
10,888
I never said Apple should be held liable. I simply said that there may be some merit to the case. Or maybe there isn't.

Okay, I'll rephrase.

Why do you think that there may be some merit to the case because of signs in a third-party retailer?
 

AppleScruff1

macrumors G4
Feb 10, 2011
10,026
2,949
Okay, I'll rephrase.

Why do you think that there may be some merit to the case because of signs in a third-party retailer?

I don't know all the details of the case. Someone from Brazil brought up in this thread that people were knowingly mislead, hence my comment.
 

BaldiMac

macrumors G3
Jan 24, 2008
8,760
10,888
I don't know all the details of the case. Someone from Brazil brought up in this thread that people were knowingly mislead, hence my comment.

Why are you avoiding the question? brdeveloper brought up a claim that there was no indication that the iPad 3 was not the newest iPad in some third-party retail stores. Why do you think there may be some merit to a case against Apple based on that claim?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.