Pardon my lack of knowledge on this, but is a higher latency (CL11 vs. CL9) good? Both have the same clockspeed 1600MHz.
I'm deciding on Amazon which one ram to buy:
the CL9 Kingston
http://www.amazon.com/1600MHz-PC3-1...TF8&colid=2A8MJAZM4GS8I&coliid=I39GK7SKH1XPFT
or the CL11 Crucial
http://www.amazon.com/Crucial-PC3-1...TF8&colid=2A8MJAZM4GS8I&coliid=I18WM6U5EWUCZA
I know knowledgeable folks here recommend the Kingston and it's only $19 more expensive than the Crucial.
Mahalo.
Memory reliability with your Mac is the #1 concern. Both Crucial and Kingston should be excellent for reliability. The lower latency for the memory at the same clock speed should be faster. Therefore 1600Mhz CL9 would be faster and generally a better choice than 1600Mhz CL11. While the official stock 1600Mhz memory spec for the late-2012 Mac Minis is CL11... unless you just want to save a little money you should try to go with the lower latency if possible. The 1600Mhz CL9 Kingston HyperX plug and play dual memory kit would be a great choice for your late-2012 Mini...and that happens to be exactly what I recently purchased for my new late-2012 model 2.3Ghz i7 Mini. Most people simply choose the standard latency of the Apple stock memory to obtain the standard stock Mini memory specs and to save a little money.
Note: This has been discussed in this forum many times but remember in the future if you ever need to have work done on your Mini under Apple warranty...that you carefully remove your upgrade memory and re-install the stock Apple memory if you by chance need to turn the Mini in to the Apple techs for repair or diagnostics.
Last edited: