I'd like to have all of this just work over bluetooth. I see no reason why it couldn't, with 4.0, and perhaps even 3.0. Sure, allow the person to charge the phone in the car if need be too.
Id rather have something like android installed on all the cars so you could download whatever apps you wanted and people could make apps to link to ios and other smart phones.
Be careful with "hands free" devices. A new study says they're no safer than manual use.
http://www.abc2news.com/dpp/lifestyle/study-hands-free-texting-more-dangerous-than-manual-texting
It's just one study though, we'll have to see how this plays out. But I can see how hands free devices give someone a false sense of safety.
Hands-free TEXTING. Because you still have to look at the screen because egg freckles, before you send, except now you feel safer.
But that's the mechanism behind most hands-free interactions. You give the voice command, but you then need to validate what you said. This is usually via visual feedback. And that's when you take your eyes off the road.
In particular, Apple is looking at ways to integrate Maps and Siri with the built-in displays increasingly found in cars.
I wish! The thing even drops my device while connected via USB! It works with bluetooth fairly well. Anytime I the vehicle on or off it completely drops all connections and I have to reconnect manually. How new is the update you downloaded?
Perhaps it does have something to do with running WinPhone 8.
I bet a stock Apple system would be the same with an iPhone.
You know what's safer yet? Use this amazing feature that's combines real time, peer to peer, full duplex voice to voice chat with a handsfree device. I shall call it "far voicer"!
This is just ugly.
No tasteful person wants to see a 500 bucks phone sitting in the middle of a 50 000+ dollars car !
Morevoer the option for GPS and Media Device is over 5000$ in this car, don't need a cheap gizmodo to improve it !
Seriously? All you got out of this story is that this (looks photoshopped) picture has a phone put in the wrong place in the car?
Totally disagree. Modern smartphones are way more advanced than on-board car nav and sync systems. And far cheaper. I hope this kind of integration replaces on-board systems.This is just ugly.
No tasteful person wants to see a 500 bucks phone sitting in the middle of a 50 000+ dollars car !
Morevoer the option for GPS and Media Device is over 5000$ in this car, don't need a cheap gizmodo to improve it !
The fact that it remained unchanged for as long as it did is what amazed me.
I disagree with the notion that many seem to have that Apple changed this connection so they could sell more accessories.
The switch was necessary, came at the right time, and is quite clearly a better connector.
They've got to move forward at some point. The old dock connector was far too large at came at the expense of not being able to have the headphone jack and improved speak/microphone ports on the bottom of the phone.
Others not.
What exactly is your point, if you have one?
I can't believe you lot are arguing over what BMW model it is in the picture.
Hope Siri doesn't start arguing with you if you take a wrong turn.
I don't understand why the iphone is on a cradle and the BMW's navigation screen is right above it since I know that newer BMW's have an iPhone dock that is integrated into the arm rest. Discreet and clean. In addtion, the dock allows for integration of Bluetooth, and audio via the BMW Link Application.
I have a '04 ZHP and my iPhone 4 is kept in my bag or glove box hidden from view and without the need of an ugly cradle (my automobile came with Bluetooth and Navigation).
That cradle really undermind's the clean dashboard.
Those who follow BMW are just as hardcore about the company as Apple fanatics.