Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
GTX 680 (2 or 4MB VR) and X-Plane 10
- Thread starter oldmanmacdummi
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Windows 8
There are so many people complaining about Windows 8 that Microsoft is working hard on Windows 8.1 to fix a lot of the complaints. Hopefully that will make it better for X Plane users.
Topper, the case that you have in your specs is the same one I put on my list of components for my next build.
I am on the fence about a GTX780 with 3GB or a GTX680 with 4GB. I only use one monitor with X Plane 10: a 24 inch at 1920 x 1080. I do have a nice Dell 24 inch monitor at 1920 x 1200 on another Hack running X Plane 9.
There are so many people complaining about Windows 8 that Microsoft is working hard on Windows 8.1 to fix a lot of the complaints. Hopefully that will make it better for X Plane users.
Topper, the case that you have in your specs is the same one I put on my list of components for my next build.
I am on the fence about a GTX780 with 3GB or a GTX680 with 4GB. I only use one monitor with X Plane 10: a 24 inch at 1920 x 1080. I do have a nice Dell 24 inch monitor at 1920 x 1200 on another Hack running X Plane 9.
I studied, studied, and studied the components.
Except for it's large size, I've found very few complaints about that case.
If it were me, I wouldn't even think twice...I'd get the GTX 780. In this case, the memory would be a very minor concern.
To quote one of the many websites (Game Debate), "In terms of overall gaming performance, the graphical capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 are massively better than the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680."
That'll be a nice hackintosh
I'll probably keep it as a PC for a little while before I change it over to hackintosh..
Unfortunately no. Although screen size does play a part in both fill-rate (major) and VRAM usage, it's the textures loaded into the Video Card which take up the Lion's share of the VRAM use.
As mentioned, I can easily fill 2Gb of VRAM on any of the hi-res orthophoto sceneries, despite my best efforts to conserve as much VRAM as I can in the completed package: (DDS textures, trimming of tiles, down sampling areas where you're likely not close to the ground, using DXT1vs DXT5 compression, etc....)
Even at 1024x768 screen size - the VRAM use for the textures is the same, which as mentioned is the vast majority of the use.
3-4 Gb should do you nicely. I run into out-of-VRAM issues on my 2Gb GTX670 if I go to "extreme" (native) resolution of the scenery textures.
Hope that helps!
I have the 7950 inside my Mac Pro which has 3 GB VRAM.
I put X-Plane 10 in extreme resolution @ 1920 x 1200.
I have downloaded a huge amount of sceneries, pay ware airports but also lots of photo sceneries.
Most of the time VRAM usage is between 2 GB and 3 GB, this is (of course) with texture compression enabled.
Disable that and load a hugely detail New York area.... easily > 4 GB!
I set the resolution to Extreme, 1920 x 1080, on my Core i7 with a 1GB GFX card, and it used all the graphics memory plus 100. Even so, it ran mostly at 39 frames on Snow Leopard and 41 frames on Windows 7 64 bit. I do not understand why the Snow Leopard side loads X Plane 10 2 to 3 times faster than Windows 7. Both running on the same computer with their own hard drives of same speed and size.
That's interesting.
I have no idea why OS X loads it faster. Are there others with the same experience?
I don't know why either, but I have noticed it, too. I can only guess its the OS X kernel is better at managing the memory subsystem and I/O.
GeForce 320.18 Driver
Version:
320.18 - WHQL
Release Date:
Thu May 23, 2013
Operating System:
Windows 7 64-bit
Windows 8 64-bit
Windows Vista 64-bit
Language:
English (US)
File Size:
175.55 MB
Supported Products:
GeForce 700 Series
GeForce GTX TITAN, GeForce GTX 780, GeForce GTX 770
.
X-Plane 10 should work just fine with Win8.
But you may have problems if you are using a yoke. Maybe Chris K knows if the yoke/joystick problem has been solved.
Last edited:
I really like my yoke & throttle quadrant, and I will not abandon it. With my lesser Hack, I use a high end joy stick to run X Plane 9.
Windows 8.1 is going to be showcased on June 26 with an expected Autumn release. That is supposed to fix a lot of problems.
Windows 8.1 is going to be showcased on June 26 with an expected Autumn release. That is supposed to fix a lot of problems.
In bootcamp, your HDD does not run in AHCI mode. It runs in standard IDE access mode, which is much much slower.
Have a quick read: https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/1098620/
I noticed that too - when I added in a Samsung 840 to my 'Pro, the Samsung tools complained that the disk wasn't running in AHCI mode On the Win7 side & I was getting about 30% of the IOPS I should have been getting. That thread explains how to hack a fix.
So no, it's not Windows being slow vs OSX (which is what I originally thought too! Same as you guys) but the lack of AHCI support specifically under EFI/Bootcamp. A little digging around led me to the culprit.
Note: AHCI works properly on the MacOSX side. You can verify this in the System Profiler app under the SATA section on the left.
Again, This problem is specific to Macs running Bootcamp - not indicative of Windows machines in general.
Hope that helps!
- CK.
Chris, my results are on my home built Core i7 PC running Win 7 & Snow Leopard. No Bootcamp involved. Any ideas? Each OS is on a separate hard drive of same manufacturer and size.
As Topper mentioned, Win 8 seems to have a problem with yokes and joysticks. What is your take on that?
Also, does Win 8 support the new GTX780 natively without add ons out of the box?
Does Win 7 support the GTX780 natively without add ons out of the box?
Last edited:
Nope. Must be attributed to something else then. I do not have a stand-alone PC for Testing/comparision with a dual boot Win/OSX environment. Anything I say would be pure conjecture.
No idea. I have neither Win8 nor a Yoke - so I have no experience with either.
No idea. I have neither Win8 nor a GTX780 - so I have no experience with either. This is best a question for someone more familiar with the subject.
No idea. I do not have a GTX7xx series, so I have no experience with this product. Again, I will leave this to others more familiar with the subject.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help. I only know, and can only speak authoritative on subjects where i have first hand experience - as not to give potentially false or misleading answers.
- CK.
Thanks for that info. That driver will probably be included with Win 8.1.
Now the decision to Hackintosh ML or Mavericks.