I'd think of it not as a very big handheld, but as a very small laptop. The richer the iOS ecosystem gets, I think the more sense a product like this makes. I already browse reddit better on an iPad than on the web on a laptop thanks to the Alien Blue app. There are many more examples too of better experiences from apps than both the web and OS X apps. Heck, many don't even have these two counterparts to begin with.Not a handheld device. Toooooooo biiiiig...... Tooo stooooopid!
I just don't see it happening.
The Mini was different, there was a market and pent up demand.
I haven't once seen/heard anyone say, "I just need my tablet as big as a laptop."
Size does matter...
in my view, they should increase the mini's size from 7.9 to 9" and the ipad's size from 9.7 to 12", that's all, no need to add one more ipad to the line.
A lot of people do love the mini's size. If going past 9.7" it likely should just be a touch Macbook Air. I'm using a touch 11.6" laptop and it is really a good thing that it has a keyboard, however I would not mind if it was a docking tablet ultrabook.
Three iPads may be too many, two iPhone sizes and two iPad is likely enough.
Give it a phone function and shut up the "needs a bigger screen" iPhone detractors.
I disagree. That's the kind of thinking that gave us the Surface. A touch device should have an interface that was designed for touch not a bastardized system that was made for a keyboard and mouse.
Now I would love to have a touch screen on my Air, in addition to the keyboard and mouse, for those times when it is just as easy to grab an icon and drag it with my finger, but going to a virtual keyboard and mouse on OS X would be a disaster in my opinion. But that is just my opinion.
If you look under apple.com then supplier responsibility on the bottom right corner there is a picture of a person holding what appears to be a larger screened iPad
Apologies if this has already been spotted