Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Steve said it takes 2 months for approval, so does that mean that the phones are not in production yet, and will not go into production until they get approved?
Probably not, since if it fails certification (by either the FCC or a carrier) and one has to go back and change something in the hardware design, one is stuck with a large volume of already-built devices that need to be disassembled and reworked to implement the change. And if they can't be reworked, e.g., there's no room or a circuit board pad to squeeze in a new part previously thought to be unnecessary to meet RF requirements, then all the boards built to that time are just so much scrap. Either way, you incur a significant expense in the rework labor or scrapped boards. It's been done more than once in the past, however, by more than one company, usually in order to avoid the penalties that accompany some contracted delivery deadline to a customer. It's called, "building at risk."

If i remember correctly, I've been to Engadget in the past when they say phones were approved by the FCC they are released within 2 weeks.
I've also seen ones that got FCC certification, and were never heard from again. :shrug: You place your bets, and you takes your chances.

But 2 months from now is March, and I thought why not Apple Surprise us on there birthday April 1 w/ an Early iPhone release?
You're asking a government agency to run on time? :D Two months is the minimum period the process takes, assuming:
  • each and every one of all the phones submitted for testing can pass all the FCC tests with margin to spare on the very first pass
  • the phone's software is sufficiently debugged that no test unit locks up or crashes during the tests
  • there's no product ahead of yours in the queue (fat chance!)
  • the stars are properly aligned
  • etc.
It seldom happens. I'd be pleasantly surprised if it does, but I'm not about to hold my breath. Besides -- Apple was founded April 1, 1976. Apple's 30th anniversary has already come and gone.

If anyone has some info on the whole FCC Process, please post.
Here's the starting point.
 
I can't start my own thread yet, but here's an article by the LA Times about how Japan's cellphones already have many of these features and more and that the iPhone doesn't even scratch the surface of many of Japan's latest phones, nevertheless be revolutionary.

http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-japanphone11jan11,0,6424968.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The reporter doesn't get all his facts right. He says that the iPhone will/can be used to download music, but this came out on the 11th so he just wasn't in the loop yet.

Still a good read and I wish we had a lot of the features that they have over there like:

-GPS
-3G
-Live TV
-Video conferencing

All of which can be added and probably will be added either by software or hardware upgrades.

Nawa spent about $170 on her sharp phone, and $25 more to decorate it, though she says some friends spend much more on decorations. But neither she nor her friend Makiko Yamada, who are sampling the phones in Harajuku, would ever pay anything close to $500 for a cellphone. A hundred dollars, tops, Yamada says.

Interesting.

The only thing we don't know is if their phones have features like:

-visual voicemail
-full-feature browser
-widescreen view
-touchscreen

and many others, but clearly there is room to grow with the iPhone. That said, I think this is a great first generation iPhone and is a great start to a iPhone line that I believe- at least in America- is truely revolutionary.

Quality is what has me hooked on this phone. And that's what I think seperates it from the rest of the pack.
 
What about the missing click wheel...???

:confused:
i've just got home from my vacations in a deserted place with no internet or whatsoever and found out about the iPhone...
It sure looks great... and has some nice features... I was expecting something looking more like a full screen ipod mock ups..
Just one thing... did anybody noticed the click wheel is gone... I don't know about you but I'm not crazy about having to use my finger to scroll up and down in that way...
Don't we agree that the click wheel was one of the most cool features of the iPod... Then why not add a virtual one in the iPhone???
Ti
 
So this "push" feature is only available through Yahoo mail? Will I have to use the browser on the phone to check my Gmail instead of having the mail seamlessly transfered to the phone?
 
:confused:
i've just got home from my vacations in a deserted place with no internet or whatsoever and found out about the iPhone...
It sure looks great... and has some nice features... I was expecting something looking more like a full screen ipod mock ups..
Just one thing... did anybody noticed the click wheel is gone... I don't know about you but I'm not crazy about having to use my finger to scroll up and down in that way...
Don't we agree that the click wheel was one of the most cool features of the iPod... Then why not add a virtual one in the iPhone???
Ti

If you look carefully at the keynote, as Steve scrolls slow through the list, it appears that the scroll wheel gesture is still used for moving precisely through the lists.

Also there are really small letters on the right side of the screen, which can probably be used to jump to where you need to go. This makes the scroll wheel unnecessary.

I think they have a better interface, but it might take us a couple of minutes to figure out, just like when the iPod came out.
 
I can't start my own thread yet, but here's an article by the LA Times about how Japan's cellphones already have many of these features and more and that the iPhone doesn't even scratch the surface of many of Japan's latest phones, nevertheless be revolutionary.

http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-japanphone11jan11,0,6424968.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The reporter doesn't get all his facts right. He says that the iPhone will/can be used to download music, but this came out on the 11th so he just wasn't in the loop yet.

Still a good read and I wish we had a lot of the features that they have over there like:

-GPS
-3G
-Live TV
-Video conferencing

All of which can be added and probably will be added either by software or hardware upgrades.

Unless its like the new wireless N cards.... then there will be a fee for live TV or video conferencing just for the software upgrade...
 
Quality is what has me hooked on this phone. And that's what I think seperates it from the rest of the pack.

What separates the iPhone from the rest of the pack is how you interact with and use it. Apple couldn't care less for the features, they did the same with the iPod and they are doing it now with the iPhone. Heck, even the Macs don't have that much features as their PC counterparts (read memory card readers and other crap).

Apple is all about Human-Machine interaction. Macs through OS X, the iPod through the clickwheel and now the iPhone using multitouch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: the future
What separates the iPhone from the rest of the pack is how you interact with and use it. Apple couldn't care less for the features, they did the same with the iPod and they are doing it now with the iPhone. Heck, even the Macs don't have that much features as their PC counterparts (read memory card readers and other crap).

Apple is all about Human-Machine interaction. Macs through OS X, the iPod through the clickwheel and now the iPhone using multitouch.

Precisely.
 
I can't start my own thread yet, but here's an article by the LA Times about how Japan's cellphones already have many of these features and more and that the iPhone doesn't even scratch the surface of many of Japan's latest phones, nevertheless be revolutionary.

http://www.latimes.com/technology/la-fi-japanphone11jan11,0,6424968.story?coll=la-home-headlines

The reporter doesn't get all his facts right. He says that the iPhone will/can be used to download music, but this came out on the 11th so he just wasn't in the loop yet.

Still a good read and I wish we had a lot of the features that they have over there like:

-GPS
-3G
-Live TV
-Video conferencing

All of which can be added and probably will be added either by software or hardware upgrades.



Interesting.

The only thing we don't know is if their phones have features like:

-visual voicemail
-full-feature browser
-widescreen view
-touchscreen

and many others, but clearly there is room to grow with the iPhone. That said, I think this is a great first generation iPhone and is a great start to a iPhone line that I believe- at least in America- is truely revolutionary.

Quality is what has me hooked on this phone. And that's what I think seperates it from the rest of the pack.

Ok, I read the article. It seems to me, like I've thought for several years, that the US cell market is well behind the rest of the world. It's not just the japanese that can post their blog on the move, or buy movie tickets on their phone... True, mine doesn't have a GPS built in, but it can find me to within about 200m in the city, and tell me how to get places!

I think a lot of European customers are clamouring for a 3G version for this very reason, whereas many American customers would just shrug... :eek:
 
All fingers and thumbs

I just hope that the 3 1/2 inch screen is large enough for people like me with fat fingers. I always have a problem with mobile phones so hopefully this will be the panacea that I need. :)
 
I don't understand the people above who are complaining about this. This is everything you wanted and more! Stop complaining and get saving for this amazing phone. Say goodbye to the Zune! :)

monkeyandy I work in the telcoms industry here in the UK and I can tell you the concensus amoung a lot of people is that Apple have maybe bitten into an industry they do not really know enough about.

There are several problems with the iPhone

1) Its built for the US market, not the rest of the world, as it does not have 3g, so is simply not compatable with the business stratagies of network operators in the rest of the world which is a serious issue Apple will have to deal with! As many operators, esp ones here in europe are relying on 3G to bring in a major part of their revenue, and their price plans and services are being based round 3G.

2) Its price, most people on this forum clearly are not aware that phone makes produce a lot of models that never make it onto the market because it is the mobile operators that make the final decision (e.g. Sony produced nearly 50 handsets in 2006 that never made it to the market!), they have to subsadise the handsets so will only do it on phones they will make money on, regardless of demand!

Expensive phones (the price the OEM charges to the network - dont confuse this with the price of a handset without contract - they are very very different!!!) are not often subsadised as they will not claw back the money from the average person from calls unless there is a very clear market for them, e.g blackberry, and with no 3g on the iPhone that is a big loss in revenue too, one that many may not be willing to risk esp with mobile tv hotting up to be the next big mass demand service.

The price will place it in the expensive price plans region, e.g. for a businessman, and it can't do push and pull email like a Blackberry can so is no good for a business in reality.

If the average person was willing to spend £300 GBP on a phone, Nokia and Sony will have produced the same phone long ago.

3) 2Mp camera and no flash, thats not good compared to what the standard is fast becoming, expect 4MP+ with a flash in 2007.

4) Network operator response - not good so far here in europe from the people who actully make the decisions about which phones will be offered to the public on price plans.

5) No removable battery - a lot of people will not like this

6) There is no front camera for video calls - again showing no thought for the non-us market in its design.

The iPhone has been known about for a long time in the industry as have the major bugs it had when he first experimental models were produced and shown us network operators. Die hard Apple fans will love it, but I don't think the rest of the market is big enough as it stands.

If it had 3g, and was half the price then maybe, but the reality is if you look at the overall market, the proportion of people spending more than £75 on a handset is smaller than most people would think.

Though top marks in the design area, it looks good, can't fault it there, even if it is larger than what most people want.

But i think the major problem is it is simply not compatable with the current business plans of non-us mobile operators!

"Originally Posted by bmoseley07
I can't start my own thread yet, but here's an article by the LA Times about how Japan's cellphones already have many of these features and more and that the iPhone doesn't even scratch the surface of many of Japan's latest phones, nevertheless be revolutionary.

http://www.latimes.com/technology/la...home-headlines

The reporter doesn't get all his facts right. He says that the iPhone will/can be used to download music, but this came out on the 11th so he just wasn't in the loop yet.

Still a good read and I wish we had a lot of the features that they have over there like:

-GPS
-3G
-Live TV
-Video conferencing

All of which can be added and probably will be added either by software or hardware upgrades"

You can't just add on the above on as a software or hardware upgrade to the phone alone as a they are network dependent and use huge bandwidth, thats the issue, hence why operators outside of the US have had to spend so much money upgrading their networks and getting additional liciences.

If you want those things soon in the US, you best bet is to write to GWB, as you FCC will have to assign more frequencies to operators, and take the required frequencies away from the current holders, the USAF. Its a real pitty you didn't try and take up GSM/GPRS at the same time as the rest of the world did, its put the US in a catch up position for what looks like a long time to come.

No disrespect but from my expereince most people in the US who use mobile phones are simply not aware of how backward your cell infrastructure, pricing plans and services avalable are compred to the rest of the world - which always really surprises me!

But the above post probably makes me sound a bit negative about the iPhone, but in all honesty, i think its pretty cool from a personal point of view having actully had a play with a demo model, but from a business point of view, i'm just not convinced Apple have got it right this time, I just hope they are willing to live up to and satisfy the demands of us network operators who obviously are the ones with the power in the industry!

And contry to what Apple execs seem to think, we actully do know what the vast majority of consumers - our customers want in terms of features, and what they are willing to pay for them - its the one thing were actually quite good at now!
 
monkeyandy I work in the telcoms industry here in the UK and I can tell you the concensus amoung a lot of people is that Apple have maybe bitten into an industry they do not really know enough about.

There are several problems with the iPhone

1) Its built for the US market, not the rest of the world, as it does not have 3g, so is simply not compatable with the business stratagies of network operators in the rest of the world which is a serious issue Apple will have to deal with! As many operators, esp ones here in europe are relying on 3G to bring in a major part of their revenue, and their price plans and services are being based round 3G.

At no point has Steve or Apple announced that non-USA iPhones will NOT have 3G.

As we all know from past announcements, Steve only tells the world what he wants. One thing he's not, is stupid. We'll obviously have to wait and see what the iPhone actually does but chances are, 3G will be a part of its European debut.
 
At no point has Steve or Apple announced that non-USA iPhones will NOT have 3G.

As we all know from past announcements, Steve only tells the world what he wants. One thing he's not, is stupid. We'll obviously have to wait and see what the iPhone actually does but chances are, 3G will be a part of its European debut.

I can only go by what we have been told and show by Apple , and there have been no signs from Apple yet that the non-us version will have 3G, quite the opposit in fact, it was quite obvious it was intended to be a US aimed product, plus it will need a front camera too, and remember a 3G arial is quite large to fit in. No consultation has been made with us as to current and intended future 3G serivices either.....
 
because it is the mobile operators that make the final decision (e.g. Sony produced nearly 50 handsets in 2006 that never made it to the market!)

i think steve just made it known that he will make the decisions about the apple phone, not the phone provider... and from my impressions if steve doesn't get his way then he won't offer the device. he seems pretty hard-nosed, more that most, and he uses that to get his way. well hes a good salesman too
 
At no point has Steve or Apple announced that non-USA iPhones will NOT have 3G.

As we all know from past announcements, Steve only tells the world what he wants. One thing he's not, is stupid. We'll obviously have to wait and see what the iPhone actually does but chances are, 3G will be a part of its European debut.

Actually he is quoted saying that it IS in the cards for later on. I'm thinking it will be in the final european release and possibly the US release.

Also, just out of curiosity, what is with the home button? It has a white square in the center and to be honest when I first saw it, I thought, that looks like a built in iSight. I wonder if its possible that its just a little secret up Apple's sleeve for the final release...
 
I can only go by what we have been told and show by Apple , and there have been no signs from Apple yet that the non-us version will have 3G, quite the opposit in fact, it was quite obvious it was intended to be a US aimed product, plus it will need a front camera too, and remember a 3G arial is quite large to fit in. No consultation has been made with us as to current and intended future 3G serivices either.....


Well, apparently you're not paying very much attention because the Steve has most definitely said "3G is coming later." And that's been known from Day 1.

*sigh*

Also, as other people have pointed out, there are different commuting patterns at play in the US vs. the rest of the world (higher use of mass transit vs. solo commuting, etc.) which plays into the relative "backwardness" of the iPhone---these factors aren't quite as cut and dried as some are making them.
 
Well, apparently you're not paying very much attention because the Steve has most definitely said "3G is coming later."
You lost me gwangung. "Ugg" says that Steve hasn't said it won't be 3G and "jhilton" replies that Steve clearly said the phone is GSM+EDGE. And jhilton is right.

Steve certainly never said that the first iPhone would be 3G. If we want to have an interesting talk, then please reply fairly to what jhilton said. Sure Steve said 3G later. No problem.

there are different commuting patterns at play in the US vs. the rest of the world (higher use of mass transit vs. solo commuting, etc.) which plays into the relative "backwardness" of the iPhone---these factors aren't quite as cut and dried as some are making them.
I'm really not sure what you're saying. Are you saying that US people don't need high speed data as much as Europeans so having slower data is not really a problem?

I guess that would be true - if you use it less, you need it less. Nah, I really can't see what you mean. US people use public transport more? or less? than Europeans. I assume you're saying Europeans use public transport more, so they have more need for access to high speed data on the move?

I'm confused by what you've said!
 
Being from the UK I feel 3G is an absolute must for a late entry into 2007, especially considering that it is a lot bigger than most standard phones. And whilst the interface is "pretty" that is something you will soon grow used to and at the end of the day it'll be the features that will keep you happy.

Things the iphone should have, but probably won't...

Bigger cam with flash.
Opens/Edits PDF/DOC/XLS (mini iWork)
Plays flash files, so YouTube.
3G, specifically HSDPA
DivX support. Although I know it won't, if it truly runs "OS X" then let me put VLC player on it.
GPS.
I didn't see MMS, so definitely put that there.
Maybe a small front cam for video conferencing.
And for fun, ability to play your songs as ring tones, although that probably won't happen either.

Bung that in there, and I'll pay £300 for it on top of my contract.
 
Hi VespR, I pretty well agree with your post.
Opens/Edits PDF/DOC/XLS (mini iWork)
Plays flash files, so YouTube.
Yeah... the iWork angle will be the most interesting to watch. A simple iWork app (or some interesting new take on the whole thing) is necessary if you're getting email and it has doc attachments.

The flash file thing is interesting. Steve said that they might convince YouTube to use h264. Perhaps Apple is building an "iTube" or a "YouPod"... an interface merged into the iPhone & iTunes for YouTube content...
 
Another thing I seem to have missed is that when Steve said Yahoo mail will be supporting push email, why has he not included this in .mac? Talk about alienating his own customers. The iphone has so much potential with .mac, and especially with that high price tag it's got to be one of Apple's most unattractive products.
 
Being from the UK I feel 3G is an absolute must for a late entry into 2007, especially considering that it is a lot bigger than most standard phones. And whilst the interface is "pretty" that is something you will soon grow used to and at the end of the day it'll be the features that will keep you happy.
.

How many times does this has to be said, Apple couldn't care less about features. The iPod was/is under-featured compared to other mp3 players, yet it flat out dominates the mp3 player market. Consumers (me included) will happily give up on features, for a device they can easily use.
 
Horrible comparison. An MP3 player is quite simply put.. An MP3 player. All they could ever mull over about adding is what codec to support and shall we put in a radio. What they did was made it easy to use.

This is a phone, and phones are one of the most competitive markets in the world. What sells a phone is FEATURES. You want something you can easily use?

nokia_6151.jpg


There you go buddy. Large, dial-friendly keypad with dedicated keys and a clear and easy-to-read 262,144-colour display. And what's that going to cost you? Next to nothing!

But you're prepared to pay over $500 for something which I guarantee won't be easy to use. Why? Because you've used phones all your life, that above phone will feel like your mums nipple straight out of birth, easy to use. I put an iPhone in my mums hand she won't know what to do with it. Only computer literated people would feel comfortable with an iPhone. And only people who can afford to drop $500. At that price you expect more than ease of use.

The iphone is a SMARTPHONE and an expensive one at that. And therefore the consumer wants features. The competition this phone has is a feature-full N95.

Comparing this to ipod of 2001 is ridiculous. Different market, different competition.
 
How many times does this has to be said, Apple couldn't care less about features. The iPod was/is under-featured compared to other mp3 players, yet it flat out dominates the mp3 player market. Consumers (me included) will happily give up on features, for a device they can easily use.

You win the thread.

We need a better term than "feature counters" for people that argue in this fashion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.