You know, after reading some of that Haxial.com guy's comments, I tend to see his point. Some of it IS smoke and mirrors. Not too long ago I was one of many complaining about Apple's price/performance/features. Surprised I wasn't called a troll.
However, some of his comments were kinda stupid. $2999 is only $1 cheaper than $3000.
3.2GHz P4s JUST coming out - of course Apple didn't use them. And the fact that he seemed to take other benchmarks at face value, versus Apple's. Which he attacked, I think, mostly because Apple is very blatant about their
Worlds First/Worlds Fastest. But this
IS just marketing. Benchmarks mean very little.
In real world performance Apples may be faster. They may not be. They may be better. Or not. It doesn't really matter. If you play certain games or use certain programs, Wintel may be a better option. Sometimes Linux is... for certain things. For those who want to do audio/video/image editing,
I feel Macs are superior.
I've used Windows to do this stuff, and it's been painful. Problems abound. Others may have had better luck, but many who've tried both would agree with me.
What's my point? I forget.
But benchmarks, shmenchmarks. The G5 is a good processor. Especially for what some people (in this case this NASA guy) do. And that's good because it's good to have choices and competition. Apple seems to be on the right track at least. Yeah Apple.
I love Macs... I tolerate PCs (barely).