Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

methdxman

macrumors member
Original poster
May 24, 2003
32
0
We all know that usually in real world tests that FW handily beats USB 2.0. My question is, I have a PC and want to get a 3G Ipod, I'm wondering if it's even worth getting a firewire card, or is the USB 2.0 almost as fast (faster) than the firewire connection? Anyone have any real world numbers or figures? thanks.
 

dethl

macrumors regular
Aug 28, 2002
246
0
Austin, TX
If you look at pricewatch.com, you cand find yourself a cheap firewire card for your computer ($11 as I type this). The cable for the USB 2.0 is $19.

If you have USB 2.0 with your computer and you don't want to mess with the insides of your computer, get the USB 2 cable.

Now if you want some conveinence, get the firewire card. You will only have one cable to mess with since firewire is a powered port, allowing you to charge your iPod while you upload data onto it.

I have not messed with USB 2.0, so I can't say how much of a difference its transfer speeds are comparted to the firewire speeds.
 

solvs

macrumors 603
Jun 25, 2002
5,684
1
LaLaLand, CA
Buy a firewire card. Newegg has some for less than $20 bucks shipped. As mentioned, the FW to USB cable is sold seperately, and also around $20. Faster, easier, and you never know when you may need FW again.
 

methdxman

macrumors member
Original poster
May 24, 2003
32
0
Sorry, let me clarify, i have a PC LAPTOP with usb 2.0 ports. I know i can get a cardbus firewire card (which i plan on doing in the future), but it's sort of a hassle because then I would need to buy a power supply for the card, etc. I'm just wondering if USB 2.0 speeds are up to par with the firewire transfer speeds because i do not mind getting the dongle and charging via ac adapter as long as the usb 2.0 speeds (real world tests) are up to par.
 

solvs

macrumors 603
Jun 25, 2002
5,684
1
LaLaLand, CA
Ah. No it will be a little slower, but not horribly so as long as it's USB 2. If it runs at USB 1, it will be VERY slow. If you don't mind the extra cable, it's no biggy.

I'd still get the FW if I could, but USB 2 isn't THAT bad. It's just a little slower than FW and has some limitations.

So a google search for specifics, I think Barefeats and one of the PC mags had some real world test results.
 

Lanbrown

macrumors 6502a
Mar 20, 2003
893
0
The small HD in the iPod cannot read or write fast enough to utilize the full connections speeds of Firewire or USB 2.0.
 

Computer_Phreak

macrumors 6502
Jul 15, 2002
375
0
Originally posted by Lanbrown
The small HD in the iPod cannot read or write fast enough to utilize the full connections speeds of Firewire or USB 2.0.

Exactly...

The speed is NOT an issue. Theoretically:

Firewire: 400 Mb/s
USB 2.0: 480 Mb/s

In some tests, USB is shown to be slower than firewire, but they are basically the same speed. Regardless of this, even a normal desktop hard drive wont be able to come even close to saturating either connection.
 

ZildjianKX

macrumors 68000
May 18, 2003
1,610
0
I wouldn't recommend a generic firewire card anyways, too may ipod compatibility problems reported.

The USB 2.0 cable for the iPod rocks though, get one :)
 

methdxman

macrumors member
Original poster
May 24, 2003
32
0
Anyone have a FireWire Cardbus adapter that works with an ipod? If so, which one?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.