Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

amoda

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Aug 9, 2006
660
8
Saw this on digg and thought you guys might want a small laugh!

Direct link to the article

Quote: ""A lot of people didn't like using Vista, and a lot of the manufacturers forced people to go up to Vista," he said.

What was the demand for the service? "We had a lot of people coming in and asking about it," Kaplan said. "Of all the signs we put up there the last two years, at least, we probably got the most response out of that one. A lot of people coming in.""
 

Carrot007

macrumors regular
Sep 18, 2006
209
0
Yorkshire
Sounds reasonable, I often help people with pc problems and a lot have asked me to do the same.

I wouldn't call vista the new me though. me was EOL product and any sane person should have moved to 2000 which was ready and fine and usuable. (me was just for people scared of NT). I feel vista will eventually be forced upon us when things require it. And TBH vists can be usuable with a lot of tweaking to remove the nonsence, though that does not heklp the average person (just for the record, yes I have a copy of vista I bought (cheap), I installed it and played for a bit and then went back to XP as I see no reason to use it ATM.).
 

SactoGuy18

macrumors 601
Sep 11, 2006
4,346
1,508
Sacramento, CA USA
I've used Windows Vista Ultimate Edition and it's actually a pretty stable OS. Problem is, you need at least a dual-core CPU and about 4 GB of RAM to make it work decently fast.

It's like the issue with Windows XP in 2001--the hardware requirements for Windows XP back then was just too much for the average computer then available unless you put in at least 515 MB of RAM minimum (the "sweet spot" of XP is about 1 GB of RAM--that's why my home computer has 1.5 GB of RAM :) ).
 

ReanimationLP

macrumors 68030
Jan 8, 2005
2,782
33
On the moon.
I've used Windows Vista Ultimate Edition and it's actually a pretty stable OS. Problem is, you need at least a dual-core CPU and about 4 GB of RAM to make it work decently fast.

It's like the issue with Windows XP in 2001--the hardware requirements for Windows XP back then was just too much for the average computer then available unless you put in at least 515 MB of RAM minimum (the "sweet spot" of XP is about 1 GB of RAM--that's why my home computer has 1.5 GB of RAM :) ).

Funny.

I was running Windows XP on a 233 MHz Pentium MMX with 256MB of RAM and it was plenty usable to me back in 2001-2002. Though I suppose the Rage128 I had helped. :3

But still, it was quite useful. I played a lot of Starcraft, Doom, ran IE6, surfed the web, email, AIM/MSN, and even occasionally crunched video.

The video part was painful though.
 

joshua-feinberg

macrumors newbie
Feb 14, 2008
6
0
PC repair shops get great service revenue opportunity

This post highlights a great full-employment act for PC repair shops.

This is also a big part of the reason why there still continues to be very strong demand for PC repair services among less-sophisticated home users that don't have access to professional IT advice.

Inside a large company with an in-house IT department, OS standardization issues are usually very thoroughly planned out.

For small businesses too small to afford/need in-house IT, they'll outsource to a local consulting firm, VAR, integrator, or solution provider (like the kind my company trains... including Mac specialists). And from this outsourced solution, small businesses will also have access to reasonably well-informed IT buying advice.

However for consumers left to fend for themselves on these issues, good luck.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.