Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

DigitalStimulus

macrumors member
Original poster
Feb 7, 2008
42
0
VT
I currently have a Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB drive for my OS and am wondering if there would be a performance gain or loss with the use of a
Seagate ST3500320AS 500gb drive instead?

My setup:
Mac Pro 2.8 8-core (early 2008)
OS X Leopard w/ 10.5.2 updates
8 GB RAM
8800GT

I use Logic Pro 8 exclusively for on this system and wanted some advice in my decision. I would like to change the 1tb drive as my time machine backup drive and use a 500gb for the OS and another 500gb for music files.

Please help!
 

catfish743

macrumors 6502
Sep 12, 2007
348
58
Kentucky
can you get a Terabyte and the partition the disk? I guess if you want double redundancy ( I think that's what it is called) just to be safe then I would go with the 2 500 GB's. How much is the Terabyte?
 

pianodude123

macrumors 6502a
Mar 1, 2005
698
0
in the internet
can you get a Terabyte and the partition the disk? I guess if you want double redundancy ( I think that's what it is called) just to be safe then I would go with the 2 500 GB's. How much is the Terabyte?

1 1TB drive is twice as stable as 2 500GBs raided together to make 1TB - (two drives = twice the probability of failure.)
 

fanbrain

macrumors 6502
Jan 31, 2005
275
48
So. UT
can you get a Terabyte and the partition the disk? I guess if you want double redundancy ( I think that's what it is called) just to be safe then I would go with the 2 500 GB's. How much is the Terabyte?

Double redunancy= 0 if the drive fails. If I had the space, I would go with the 2x500GB rather than the 1TB. I didn't have the room so I chose the 1TB to go along with the 500GB boot disk (two bay G5 tower). Did that make sense?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.