Neither am I. I run Windows XP Pro, Leopard and Ubuntu but the point I was originally making is I would still pay the money for a mac. We can only hope in the coming months those vulnerabilities will be taken care of with Snow Leopard.
One reason alone to buy a Mac: No Conflictor Worm!!!
Macs don't get virus attacks or malware (it would be extremely rare, if ever). Meanwhile many of my PC friends do get virus problems, etc. that slow them down and wreck havoc. Many PC friends have to pay a Geek Squad allot of money to get their computer up and running after almost inevitable problems occur. There is also the $90 or so a year for anti-virus software, plus research time, scares and updates to keep up with on PC's. All non-productive and costly!!!
Macs just work! Plug and play to the max. They have a great OS and come with iLife (easy to use and professional looking photo managing/editing, movie editing, web, music making and dvd authoring software).
I could go on and on. The price is worth every penny and the machines really last. Apple has the best service per every consumer magazine.
Don't miss out on the student discounts, the Apple refurbished units that have the same warrantee as new and the back to school deals!
For one, MacBook's LCD is one of the worst in any current laptop
I'm not the only one who thinks Apple's laptop displays are the cream of the crop out there:
"this screen is the best we've ever seen in a laptop" - Digital Photography Insights
"Oh, and did I mention that screen? You know the difference between regular TV and high-def TV? That's what it feels like using this model." - PC World
"The LED-backlit display is nothing short of stunning here . . The screen is classic, gorgeous Apple" - Engadget
I'm not the only one who thinks Apple's laptop displays are the cream of the crop out there:
"this screen is the best we've ever seen in a laptop" - Digital Photography Insights
"Oh, and did I mention that screen? You know the difference between regular TV and high-def TV? That's what it feels like using this model." - PC World
"The LED-backlit display is nothing short of stunning here . . The screen is classic, gorgeous Apple" - Engadget
Yes, they are very much worth the money. Just the price for the LED Backlit LCD screens is worth it alone. No PC laptops on the market have the quality of contrast and color of the MacBook screens.
In your original post:
..you referred to the MacBook screens, which have been sharply criticized by many critics. Many people find the MacBook displays washed out and disappointing on many levels. The MacBook Pro screens on the other hand have been praised for their quality. Those reviews you've provided are all referring to the LED displays on the 15" MacBook Pros and are not referring to the MacBook displays. I'd agree with the critics of those reviews when they state that these are among the nicest displays available in a 15" laptop. But make no mistake that the MacBook displays aren't up to the same caliber and those reviews aren't praising the 13" MacBook displays.
Sorry, but you are mistaken. The new MacBooks have LED-backlit screens just as the MacBook Pro. Read the Engadget review.
I couldn't help but laugh at this comment. While we agree that the MacBook is a great laptop, the screens Apple is using in them are a far cry from what Sony is using in their 13" Vaio Z notebooks. There is absolutely no comparison between these two screens, besides the fact that they are both LED...
Your friends actually go to geek squad for their issues?
Even the people who work for geek squad are clueless. I used to work for them, and I was the only one who knew anything.
Personally, I think your friends shouldn't even be using a computer until they understand it better. Same goes for macs. Seriously, anyone who has the go to geek squad is a huge noob.
Forget the marketing bs from both. Computers are designed by engineers, for engineers. Just because everybody can buy them and they appear to be a commodity does not make them one. Their basic design has not changed since they were invented. Even when woz designed the Apple I and had visions of anybody being able to have a computer, he was also thinking about people programming them. It is the way engineers think. Unless there is a revolution and their fundamental design isn't changed, this will not change.Wow I doubt that Microsoft or Apple would agree with you there. You shouldn't have to be a mechanic to drive a car. You shouldn't need a degree in computer science to use a computer.
Long post
Um, it was NEVER debunked that marketshare has nothing to do with--people just say that. OSX has been exploited before. Care to explain why OSX is always the first to fall at these hacker events: http://edge.i-hacked.com/mac-os-x-first-to-fall. What does that tell me from a logical standpoint? OSX can easily be exploited, but it's just not the main target of people who exploit operating systems because there is really no benefit considering the market share.
Great story, but the whole vista thing is BS.
Why are you running Tiger on your 2002 Mac? Because it can't run Leopard properly.
So why do you expect a PC that does not match Vista's real world requirements to run it anyway? Because it is a year old? So you buy a marginal PC from a company that sells marginal PC's and it is the OS's fault? Give me a break.
My PC is about 2 years old, was (upper) midrange when I build it and it runs Vista just as well as it does XP without any discernible speed difference and even faster with some things. But then again, I didn't try to get a dollar for a dime.
You bash Vista DRM provisions, yet you completely ignore a similar scheme in iTunes.
You slam fanboyism from both sides, yet you display the same Apple fanboy behavior through a long post with comments covered with a (false) appearance of objectiveness.
Stop measuring Macs and PCs with two different standards. Like you said, you get what you pay for. A $200 pc will never be more than a $200 pc. If you don't want to spend more, don't bitch if it doesn't do what a $2000 pc does. Buy quality parts or quality computer and you end up with similar pricetags as Apple, with similar capabilities and experience. With similar pricing, the OS is a matter of personal preference. Neither is bad, neither is perfect. And neither does everything better. Recognizing their strengths brings a lot more than slamming either one because you personally don't like it.
Great story, but the whole vista thing is BS.
Why are you running Tiger on your 2002 Mac? Because it can't run Leopard properly.
So why do you expect a PC that does not match Vista's real world requirements to run it anyway? Because it is a year old? So you buy a marginal PC from a company that sells marginal PC's and it is the OS's fault? Give me a break.
My PC is about 2 years old, was (upper) midrange when I build it and it runs Vista just as well as it does XP without any discernible speed difference and even faster with some things. But then again, I didn't try to get a dollar for a dime.
You bash Vista DRM provisions, yet you completely ignore a similar scheme in iTunes.
You slam fanboyism from both sides, yet you display the same Apple fanboy behavior through a long post with comments covered with a (false) appearance of objectiveness.
Stop measuring Macs and PCs with two different standards. Like you said, you get what you pay for. A $200 pc will never be more than a $200 pc. If you don't want to spend more, don't bitch if it doesn't do what a $2000 pc does. Buy quality parts or quality computer and you end up with similar pricetags as Apple, with similar capabilities and experience. With similar pricing, the OS is a matter of personal preference. Neither is bad, neither is perfect. And neither does everything better. Recognizing their strengths brings a lot more than slamming either one because you personally don't like it.
People have been saying for years how it is because of apple's market share that they are not a target. Yet, as Apple's market share has slowly crept upwards, there are still no viruses. the iLife 09 torrent contained a TROJAN, not a virus. It was installed by the user themselves, who typed in their password and hit "ok" to do so. And this is the only (or at least the most) publicized trojan out there. At least once a week on CNN there is some new 'windows virus of death' out there. Conficker? Millions of computers...Ring a bell???
You say that OS X has been exploited on numerous occasions, however that was Safari at the Pwn2Own competition (which is sponsored by microsoft) and it was done via local connection. Oddly enough, the top exploiters all used OS X on their primary machines, as it was their OS of choice. And let me just say - I made the switch from pc to mac recently, and I love the design of the notebook, the customer support and service I get, and the fact that malware can't just go on installing itself in the background without me even knowing about it. Also, the fact that there is a brick-and-mortar location (apple store) within 20 minutes of my house where I can bring my computer and have them fix it offers some peace of mind. No help for me when my old HP Pavilion caught a virus.
Whether a Mac is worth the money or not is purely subjective. Only you can assess what it's worth to you.Ive used a PC all my life but Im thinking of getting a mac. Are they worth the money?
Well... if OS X was waterproof, Apple wouldn't be releasing security updates on a regular basis.People have been saying for years how it is because of apple's market share that they are not a target. Yet, as Apple's market share has slowly crept upwards, there are still no viruses.
Thanks for bumping a 3 1/2 year old thread.Mac is totally worth it! I have 2 mac's, my Macbook Air and my iMac. They both don't have problems and they're fast. My Air is running Snow Leopard and my iMac is running Lion. I am a fan of Mac and I am really happy with it. If you need to use Windows, use Boot Camp.
How exactly? I don't think it is, it's just preference. People think Macs are better for creativity and they are not lol
----------
Bad advice
Mac is totally worth it! I have 2 mac's, my Macbook Air and my iMac. They both don't have problems and they're fast. My Air is running Snow Leopard and my iMac is running Lion. I am a fan of Mac and I am really happy with it. If you need to use Windows, use Boot Camp.