And so are hard drives. They're "designed" (as you'd say it) not to fail, but it happens. You're assuming everything always works 100% of time without question, but that's not how life works. Go ahead and run a CPU in a laptop 24/7 for months (or years if you can get that far) on end and see how that pans out for you.
The question is do cpus wear out by using them 100%
My point is no they are not as
1) They are designed for that load with conservatism built into the design
2) They are not the component to worry about. Other parts (such as hdd's)will fail before the cpu
3) As such, there is NO reason to worry about wearing down the cpu as the cpu is not the limiting factor
Again, I'm not saying NOR DID I EVER SAY don't use your CPU at full speed.
I never said you did. Might want to re-read the thread
What you are sat=ying is that using a cpu at 100% for extended periods of time will cause it to degrade/fail. That is just inaccurate
I'm just saying running it 100% for a very, very long time will shorten it's lifespan.
As I have said, the cpu is not the limiting factor.
If you run a cpu at 100%, the failure will
not be a result of the cpu being worn down. Other components will fail long beofre the cpu shows any signs of "wear"
That analogy makes no sense at all in relation to what we're talking about.
Sure it does. You are making a silly argument implying that the cpu being worn down is the limiting factor in the computer failing
Other components, such as fans or logic bords, will fail long before the cpu wears out...
Also, using the higher octane gas in a car that wouldn't know what to do with it wouldn't have any negative impact (although I agree it is a dumb thing to do if the car isn't designed to take advantage of it).
That wasn't the point of the analogy, which was that people believe it's better for the car when it has no effect if its not designed for higher octane.
Again, so you actually read what I'm saying this time and not make crap up, Higher octane has NO NEGATIVE impact on a car that can't take advantage of it
That wasn't what I said. You should try reading my posts.
And what "crap" am I making up again?
What I said...People believe it has a positive effect. it doesnt. I never said it has a negative effect (aside from costing more)...
, but dangerously high temperatures WILL HAVE a negative impact on a CPU that isn't designed for it.
The only way you will reach "dangerously high temps is when a component, such as a fan, fails to cool it.
You will
never reach dangerously high temps by running the cpu 100% for whatever length of time as that is the design. Yes high temps to the cpu
in the event of a cooling failure will cause it to fail. However, running at 100% until such a failure will
never result in dangeroulsy high temperatures
HDDs have moving parts. Big difference. I browse plenty of computer forums and I have never seen anyone post about their CPU die from normal use or even moderate overclocking. Only times ever were from crazy overvolting for extreme overclocking.
Yup, same here
The cpu is NEVER the limiting factor when used within operating specs (yes, that includes 100%)