I'm beginning to think you have no idea how these things work.
No, I get it. You have just
COMPLETELY missed the point of this discussion.
I am still laughing over the irony of posting this on an apple forum.
I didnt read the rest of your post because you arent making a whole lot of sense, tbh.
Had you not been
"laughing" so much, and actually took the time to read people's posts, you might be able to follow the discussion better.
My point is not about the minutiae of the tech. I get that even minor changes can have larger, far-reaching effects on the entire system. Had you actually read what I was saying, multiple times, you would see that I was simply using those newer tech parts as exaggerated examples of why I feel your logic is incorrect.
My point, as it has been
THE ENTIRE TIME, is that while it is all well and good to have high-tech
(current) parts in your consumer electronics devices, when they come with a much higher cost than people are expecting, that isn't good. Launching the PS3 with the specs it has, and at $600, means that over time, there is only so low the retail price will get.
You say that the 360 was
"built as cheaply as possible" as a sort of knock on the system. You can lecture people all you want on how well or not the 360 was engineered, but keeping high-cost parts
(HD-DVD, wifi, HDD) out of the base machine is precisely why it is selling for only $200 now
AND making them a profit. Contrast that to Sony who is only at $300, and still losing $$$ on every PS3 sold.
I couldn't care less about the spec of the machine. I want good games from my game machine. Even an Arcade with no HDD, wifi, or HD-DVD, which you refer to as "cheap", "pitiful", "junk" and "mediocre", will play one of my favorite games this generation (Geo Wars 2). And while I have many games I really enjoy on my PS3, it is just a shame that it had to cost me so much to get them, considering most of those spec-sheet highlight parts aren't a factor with them.