No worries, it will be the sixth gen iPhone and thus the iPhone 6.Why do people (e.g professional journalists) keep referring to the next (yet unreleased) iPhone as 'iPhone 5'? Why would Apple call the 6th iPhone 'iPhone 5'?
'coz it's the next one in the naming cycle.
"iPhone 6" won't make sense to anyone except pedantic mugginses like you.
They may even call it "the new iPhone" or just "iPhone".
iPod nano (6th generation)
iPod touch (4th generation)
iPad (3rd generation)
...
iPhone (6th generation)
only makes sense.
They will most definitely not call it "the new iPhone". Its weird, confusing, and doesn't match up with naming Apple has ever used.'coz it's the next one in the naming cycle.
"iPhone 6" won't make sense to anyone except pedantic mugginses like you.
They may even call it "the new iPhone" or just "iPhone".
No worries, it will be the sixth gen iPhone and thus the iPhone 6.
I understand what you mean and it is indeed the most logical thing to just call it the "iPhone" just like the third generation iPad is now called "iPad" (not "new iPad").It will be called the "new iPhone" and people will most certainly refer to it as iPhone 5. Why, do you ask? I believe the term "iPhone 5" no longer refers to the phones generation, but is labeled by the public as "the phone that will replace the current phone". In other words, the iPhone 5 is like a standard the iPhone must reach. iPhone 6 means nothing to the average consumer, but to release the new iPhone and call it "new iPhone" would most certainly mean it would be referred to as "iPhone 5"
Why do people keep asking this question? Look at the history of iPhone device names. That's why. Why would Apple call the 2nd iPhone the 3G? Why would Apple call the third iPhone the 3Gs? Why would Apple call the 5th iPhone the 4s? The model name isn't necessarily the sequence # of the model.Why do people (e.g professional journalists) keep referring to the next (yet unreleased) iPhone as 'iPhone 5'? Why would Apple call the 6th iPhone 'iPhone 5'?
How does 1 example out of 5 examples mean anything? Why were no other models named using this scheme? What about the "s" models which were basically tweaked revisions of the prior models? Do they really count as a separate generation? The selective reasoning used by many is very odd. Just because one thing seems to support your argument doesn't mean that it's the reason (i.e coincidental != causal).The iPhone 4, however, was the fourth generation iPhone and that's why it was called the iPhone 4.
They will most definitely not call it "the new iPhone". Its weird, confusing, and doesn't match up with naming Apple has ever used.
The word 'new' is a part of speech called an adjective, particularly here when used lower case, and supporting an new object that has been released.Oh, you mean like how they didn't call the new iPad "the new iPad"?
Why do people keep asking this question? Look at the history of iPhone device names. That's why. Why would Apple call the 2nd iPhone the 3G? Why would Apple call the third iPhone the 3Gs? Why would Apple call the 5th iPhone the 4s? The model name isn't necessarily the sequence # of the model.
How does 1 example out of 5 examples mean anything? Why were no other models named using this scheme? What about the "s" models which were basically tweaked revisions of the prior models? Do they really count as a separate generation? The selective reasoning used by many is very odd. Just because one thing seems to support your argument doesn't mean that it's the reason (i.e coincidental != causal).
Why do people keep asking this question? Look at the history of iPhone device names. That's why. Why would Apple call the 2nd iPhone the 3G? Why would Apple call the third iPhone the 3Gs? Why would Apple call the 5th iPhone the 4s? The model name isn't necessarily the sequence # of the model.